Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Renunciation Paradox: an Analysis of Vulnerability and Intimacy in Nietzsche’s Anti-Humanism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nietzsche’s texts contain a puzzle about the role of vulnerability in the creation of intimacy and its function on behalf of human flourishing. I describe the interpretive puzzle and its prima facie paradoxical aspects. On the one hand, there are texts in which Nietzsche expresses a longing for intimacy and other texts where he furnishes details about the possibility of intimacy between equals. On the other hand, Nietzsche is severely critical of certain types of intimacy (especially ones requiring vulnerability and authenticity) and advocates for a pathos of distance in human relationships. I claim that Nietzschean intimacy is not an inherently paradoxical concept. A proper understanding of Nietzsche’s anti-humanism provides the resources to resolve the paradox and to use the solution of the puzzle to illuminate Nietzsche’s insights about human psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, R. (1997). Odd bedfellows: Nietzsche and mill on marriage. History of European Ideas, 23(2–4), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, R. (1999). Circles, ladders and stars: Nietzsche on friendship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2(4), 50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic Love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2009). Affirmation versus vulnerability: On contemporary ethical debates. In C. Boundas (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: The intensive reduction (pp. 143–160). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, Love, parent, and Lead. Gotham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (2007). Genealogies and the state of nature. In A. Thomas & N. York (Eds.), Bernard Williams. Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2005). Politics of friendship. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diprose, R. (2002). Corporeal generosity: On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freibach-Heifetz, D. (2005). Pure air and solitude and bread and medicine: Nietzsche’s conception of friendship. Philosophy Today, 49(3), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, R. (1977). Violence and the sacred. Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, R. (2006). The ‘I’s have it: Nietzsche on subjectivity. Inquiry, 49(3), 218–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, N. (2007). Honest illusion: Valuing for Nietzsche’s free spirits. In B. Leiter & N. Sinhababu (Eds.), Nietzsche and morality (pp. 157–191). Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janaway, C. (2007). Beyond selflessness: Reading Nietzsche’s genealogy. Oxford University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loos, A. (2002). Divine action and the trinity: A brief exploration of the grounds of Trinitarian speech about god in the theology of Adolf Schlatter. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 4(3), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (1986). Marx, Nietzsche, and Modernity. Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard, O. (1991). In defense of the accidental. Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W., Johnson, V., & Kolodny, R. (1994). Heterosexuality. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaki, D. (2015). The equivocal use of power in Nietzsche’s failed anti-egalitarianism. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 12(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1994). Pity and mercy: Nietzsche’s stoicism. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche, genealogy, morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s genealogy of morals (pp. 139–167). University of California.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paphitis, S. A. (2013). Vulnerability and the sovereign individual: Nussbaum and Nietzsche on the role of agency and vulnerability in personhood. South African Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2009). Nietzsche’s Freedoms. In K. Gemes & S. May (Eds.), Nietzsche on freedom and autonomy (pp. 127–150). Oxford University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2010). Truth and truthfulness. Princeton University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Stefan Lukits

Authors
  1. Stefan Lukits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Lukits.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukits, S. The Renunciation Paradox: an Analysis of Vulnerability and Intimacy in Nietzsche’s Anti-Humanism. Philosophia 50, 1311–1325 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00431-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00431-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation