Skip to main content

Précis of Wild Animal Ethics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Peter Singer (1975) suggests that intervening in predation would, in principle, be morally justified, but that our fallibility militates against doing so in practice. For consequentialists who endorse intervention both in principle and in practice, see Cowen, 2003; Horta, 2010; and Faria & Paez, 2015

  2. There are some notable exceptions, however. Effective altruist groups working on wild animal suffering include Wild Animal Initiative, Animal Ethics, and Rethink Priorities.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle Johannsen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johannsen, K. Précis of Wild Animal Ethics. Philosophia 50, 847–851 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00423-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00423-6