Abstract
Ernest Becker described society as a symbolic action system designed to serve as a vehicle for earthly heroism. He advocates for a 'creative solution', which suggests that heroism can manifest itself objectively, through artworks. By further developing this idea (doubled by a Durkheimian perspective, and given that things can be people-like), I argue that some things can become heroic when being archived or put on display. Like heroic individuals, heroic objects are privileged things that distinguish themselves among stuff that goes unnoticed, while also being the central points of earthly heroic systems. Instead, heroic objects constrain the individuals to relate to them in a specific contemplative way, gaining cult value through exhibition. This used to be the case for relics and hero remains, but also the standard metre bar, which Marcel Duchamp cleverly ridiculed, underlining the contingent nature of cultural archived truths. Therefore, after broadly discussing heroic objects, I will narrow it down to the case of the standard metre and the readymades, further developing the idea of things becoming heroic objects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Becker also strongly argued for a 'working level of narcisism' which is inseparable from self-esteem, at Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death, 3.
In the sense that it wasn't on public display.
References
Assman, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity, new german critique, no. Cultural History/cultural Studies, 65, 125–133.
Becker, E. (1997). The denial of death. Free Press Paperbacks.
Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning. The Free Press.
Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, translated by H. Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.
Danto, A. (1981). “Aesthetic responses and works of art.” Philosophic Exchange, 12(1), 5.
de Jong, I. J. F. (2006). The homeric narrator and his own Kleos. Mnemosyne, 59(2), 188–207.
Derrida, J., & Eric, P. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Diacritics, 25(2), 9–63.
Duncan, C. (2005). Civilizing rituals: Inside public art museums. Routledge.
Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press.
Frederik, F. (2008). 2008. “Differences that matter. Materialities, material culture and social practice.” In H. Glørstad & L. Hedeager (Eds.), Six essays on the materiality of society and culture (pp. 127–154). Bircoleur Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2012). The end of history and the last man. Penguin Books.
Geary, P. (1986). Sacred commodities: The circulation of medieval relics. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things. Cambridge University Press.
Geismar, H. (2011). Material culture studies and other ways to theorize objects: A primer to a regional debate (pp. 210–218). Cambridge University Press.
Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency. Oxford University Press.
Gell, A. (2006). Vogel’s net. In P. Morgan & H. Morphy (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader. Blackwell Pub.
Gell, A. (2013). “The network of standard stopagges”. In L. Chua, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Distributed objects. Meaning and mattering after Alfred Gell, Berghan Books.
Harrison, S. (1999). Identity as a scarce resource. Social Anthropology, 7(3), 239–251.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Blackwell Publishers.
Hope, V. M., & Marshall, E. (2000). Death and disease in the ancient city. Routledge.
Hubert, H. & Mauss, M. (1964). Sacrifice: Its nature and function, translated by W. D. Halls, The University of Chicago Press.
Jones, S. S. (2012). The concept of belief in the elementary forms. In N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering, & W. Watts Miller (Eds.), On Durkheim’s elementary forms of religious life. Routledge.
Küchler, S., & Carroll, T. (2021). A return to the object. Alfred Gell, art, and social theory. Routledge.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review Monograph, 38, 103–131.
Livingston, J. C. (1971). Modern christian thought. New York: Macmillan Company.
Luisetti, F., & David, S. (2008). Reflections on Duchamp. Bergson readymade. Diacritics, 38(4), 77–93.
Marshall, E. (1997). Ideology and reception: reading symbols of Roman Cyrene. In H. Parkins (Ed.), Roman urbanism. Routledge.
Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. Duke University Press.
Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1996). “Editorial”. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 5–14.
Miller, D. (2006). Material culture: The social life of external objects. British Journal of Psychotherapy., 14, 483–492.
Nagy, G. (2013). The ancient Greek hero in 24 hours. Harvard University Press.
Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux De mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
Norton, L. (1917). The Richard mutt case. The Blind Man, 2, 5–6.
Pinney, C. (2020). Prophetic pictures. Or, What time is the visual? In A. Walford, T. Carroll, & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and advancements in material culture studies: Perspectives from UCL anthropology (1st edn). Routledge.
Pomian, K. (1991). Collectors and Curiosities. Polity Press.
Rank, O. (1968). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development. Agathon Press.
Ricœur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting, translated by Kathleen, B. & David, P. Chicago University Press.
Rubio, D. F. (2016). On the discrepancy between objects and things: An ecological approach. Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 59–86.
Schiermer, B. (2016). Fetishes and factishes: Durkheim and Latour. The British Journal of Sociology, 2016(67), 497–515.
Scimecca, J. A. (1979). Cultural hero systems and religious beliefs: The ideal-real social science of Ernest Becker. Review of Religious Research, Springer, 21(1), 62–70.
Thompson, R. F. (1973). An aesthetic of the cool. African Arts, 7(1), 41–91.
Wagner, R. (1981). The invention of culture. University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cojocaru, M. The Creative Solution: Privileged Things as Heroic Objects. Philosophia 50, 473–486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00411-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00411-w