Skip to main content
Log in

The Creative Solution: Privileged Things as Heroic Objects

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ernest Becker described society as a symbolic action system designed to serve as a vehicle for earthly heroism. He advocates for a 'creative solution', which suggests that heroism can manifest itself objectively, through artworks. By further developing this idea (doubled by a Durkheimian perspective, and given that things can be people-like), I argue that some things can become heroic when being archived or put on display. Like heroic individuals, heroic objects are privileged things that distinguish themselves among stuff that goes unnoticed, while also being the central points of earthly heroic systems. Instead, heroic objects constrain the individuals to relate to them in a specific contemplative way, gaining cult value through exhibition. This used to be the case for relics and hero remains, but also the standard metre bar, which Marcel Duchamp cleverly ridiculed, underlining the contingent nature of cultural archived truths. Therefore, after broadly discussing heroic objects, I will narrow it down to the case of the standard metre and the readymades, further developing the idea of things becoming heroic objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Becker also strongly argued for a 'working level of narcisism' which is inseparable from self-esteem, at Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death, 3.

  2. In the sense that it wasn't on public display.

References

  • Assman, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity, new german critique, no. Cultural History/cultural Studies, 65, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1997). The denial of death. Free Press Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, translated by H. Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.

  • Danto, A. (1981). “Aesthetic responses and works of art.” Philosophic Exchange, 12(1), 5.

  • de Jong, I. J. F. (2006). The homeric narrator and his own Kleos. Mnemosyne, 59(2), 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., & Eric, P. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Diacritics, 25(2), 9–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. (2005). Civilizing rituals: Inside public art museums. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederik, F. (2008). 2008. “Differences that matter. Materialities, material culture and social practice.” In H. Glørstad & L. Hedeager (Eds.), Six essays on the materiality of society and culture (pp. 127–154). Bircoleur Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2012). The end of history and the last man. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, P. (1986). Sacred commodities: The circulation of medieval relics. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, H. (2011). Material culture studies and other ways to theorize objects: A primer to a regional debate (pp. 210–218). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (2006). Vogel’s net. In P. Morgan & H. Morphy (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader. Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (2013). “The network of standard stopagges”. In L. Chua, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Distributed objects. Meaning and mattering after Alfred Gell, Berghan Books.

  • Harrison, S. (1999). Identity as a scarce resource. Social Anthropology, 7(3), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, V. M., & Marshall, E. (2000). Death and disease in the ancient city. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, H. & Mauss, M. (1964). Sacrifice: Its nature and function, translated by W. D. Halls, The University of Chicago Press.

  • Jones, S. S. (2012). The concept of belief in the elementary forms. In N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering, & W. Watts Miller (Eds.), On Durkheim’s elementary forms of religious life. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, S., & Carroll, T. (2021). A return to the object. Alfred Gell, art, and social theory. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review Monograph, 38, 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. C. (1971). Modern christian thought. New York: Macmillan Company.

  • Luisetti, F., & David, S. (2008). Reflections on Duchamp. Bergson readymade. Diacritics, 38(4), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. (1997). Ideology and reception: reading symbols of Roman Cyrene. In H. Parkins (Ed.), Roman urbanism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1996). “Editorial”. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 5–14.

  • Miller, D. (2006). Material culture: The social life of external objects. British Journal of Psychotherapy., 14, 483–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G. (2013). The ancient Greek hero in 24 hours. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux De mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L. (1917). The Richard mutt case. The Blind Man, 2, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinney, C. (2020). Prophetic pictures. Or, What time is the visual? In A. Walford, T. Carroll, & S. Walton (Eds.), Lineages and advancements in material culture studies: Perspectives from UCL anthropology (1st edn). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomian, K. (1991). Collectors and Curiosities. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, O. (1968). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development. Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting, translated by Kathleen, B. & David, P. Chicago University Press.

  • Rubio, D. F. (2016). On the discrepancy between objects and things: An ecological approach. Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiermer, B. (2016). Fetishes and factishes: Durkheim and Latour. The British Journal of Sociology, 2016(67), 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scimecca, J. A. (1979). Cultural hero systems and religious beliefs: The ideal-real social science of Ernest Becker. Review of Religious Research, Springer, 21(1), 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. F. (1973). An aesthetic of the cool. African Arts, 7(1), 41–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (1981). The invention of culture. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Cojocaru.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cojocaru, M. The Creative Solution: Privileged Things as Heroic Objects. Philosophia 50, 473–486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00411-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00411-w

Keywords

Navigation