, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 257–276 | Cite as

Appraising Objections to Practical Apatheism

  • Trevor Hedberg
  • Jordan Huzarevich


This paper addresses the plausibility of practical apatheism: an attitude of apathy or indifference about philosophical questions pertaining to God’s existence grounded in the belief that they lack practical significance. Since apatheism is rarely discussed, we begin by clarifying the position and explaining how it differs from some of the other positions one may take with regard to the existence of God. Afterward, we examine six distinct objections to practical apatheism. Each of these objections posits a different reason for thinking that belief in God is practically significant. Five of these objections prove unsuccessful. The sixth, which appeals to the practical significance of belief in God with respect to our fates in the afterlife, is more promising but nonetheless encounters significant obstacles. Since the success of this objection is controversial, whether we have good grounds to reject practical apatheism should be similarly controversial, and the view should be given further examination.


Apatheism Practical apatheism Existence of god Ethics Miracles Meaning of life Afterlife 



We thank audiences at East Tennessee State University, University of Tennessee Chattanooga, and Western Washington University for providing valuable feedback on material that was incorporated into this manuscript. We extend special thanks to E. J. Coffman, Garret Merriam, Robert McKim, Brian Ribeiro, Scott Aikin, Don Hatcher, Jonathan Kvanvig, and Ira DeSpain for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Finally, we thank the many anonymous reviewers whose feedback helped us to clarify and refine our arguments.


  1. Adams, R. (1987). The virtue of faith and other essays in philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. (1920). Prima secundae partis. Summa theologica (trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province) (2nd and revised ed.). London: Burns Oates and Washbourne. Accessed 15 February 2012.
  3. Aristotle. (1962). Nicomachean ethics (trans. M. Ostwald). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Audi, R. (2005). Intrinsic value and meaningful life. Philosophical Papers, 34(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balch, R. W., Farnsworth, G., & Wilkins, S. (1983). When the bombs drop: Reactions to disconfirmed prophecy in a millennial sect. Sociological Perspectives, 26(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budimir, M. (2008). Apatheism: The new face of religion? Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy, 45, 87–93.Google Scholar
  7. Chrzan, K. (1994). Necessary gratuitous evil: An oxymoron revisited. Faith and Philosophy, 11(1), 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig, W. L. (2008). Reasonable faith: Christian truth and apologetics (3rd ed.). Wheaton: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
  9. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, J. M. (2009). Why immortality is not so bad. In Our stories: Essays on life, death, and free will (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gebauer, J. E., & Maio, G. R. (2012). The need to belong can motivate belief in God. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 465–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasker, W. (1992). The necessity of gratuitous evil. Faith and Philosophy, 9(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasker, W. (1997). O’Connor on gratuitous natural evil. Faith and Philosophy, 14(3), 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasker, W. (2004a). Can God permit “just enough” evil? In Providence, evil, and the openness of God (pp. 81–94). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hasker, W. (2004b). Providence, evil and the openness of god. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hedberg, T. (2014). Epistemic supererogation and its implications. Synthese, 191(15), 3621–3637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hick, J. (1992). The universality of the golden rule. In J. Runzo (Ed.), Ethics, religion, and the good society: New directions in a pluralistic world (pp. 155–166). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  19. Howard-Snyder, D., & Howard-Snyder, F. (1999). Is theism compatible with gratuitous evil? American Philosophical Quarterly, 36(2), 115–129.Google Scholar
  20. Hume, D. (1993). An enquiry concerning human understanding (ed. E. Steinberg) (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  21. Kahane, G. (2011). Should we want god to exist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(3), 674–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kavka, G. (2007). A reconciliation project. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 101–113). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Kay, A. C., Shepherd, S., Blatz, C. W., Chua, S. N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). For God (or) country: The hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 725–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraay, K. J. (n.d.). William Hasker on gratuitous evil. Accessed 2 August 2016.
  25. Kraay, K. J., & Dragos, C. (2013). On preferring God’s non-existence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, M. (1983). Pascal’s wager as an argument for not believing in god. Religious Studies, 19, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKim, R. (2001). Religious ambiguity and religious diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, J. T., & Leach, M. M. (2015). Dogmatism and mental health: A comparison of the religious and secular. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  30. Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nielsen, K. (1964). Ethics without god. Ohio University Review, 6, 48–62.Google Scholar
  32. Nolt, J. (2010). Hope, self-transcendence, and environmental ethics. Inquiry, 53(2), 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Connor, D. (1998). God and inscrutable evil: In defense of theism and atheism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Partridge, E. (1981). Why care about the future? In E. Partridge (Ed.), Responsibilities to future generations (pp. 203–220). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  35. Pascal, B. (2008). Pensées and other writings (trans. H. Levi; ed. A. Levi). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Perry, J. (1978). A dialogue on personal identity and immortality. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Pojman, L. (2007). A critique of ethical relativism. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 38–51). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  38. Quinn, P. (1978). Divine commands and moral requirements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rauch, J. (2003). Let it be. The Atlantic. Accessed 22 October 2013.
  40. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ribeiro, B. (2011). The problem of heaven. Ratio, 24(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowe, W. L. (1991). Ruminations about evil. Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruse, M. (2007). Evolution and ethics: The sociobiological approach. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 618–633). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  44. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2009). Morality without god. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Steger, M. F. (2009). Meaning in life. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 679–687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Swinburne, R. (1968). Miracles. Philological Quarterly, 18, 320–328.Google Scholar
  47. Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wielenberg, E. J. (2005). Virtue and value in a godless universe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, B. (1973). The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality. In Problems of the self (pp. 82–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zuckerman, P. (2010). Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations