Is Life’s Meaning Ultimately Unthinkable?: Guy Bennett-Hunter on the Ineffable

Abstract

In this critical notice of Guy Bennett-Hunter’s Ineffability and Religious Experience, I focus on claims he makes about what makes a life meaningful. According to Bennett-Hunter, for human life to be meaningful it must obtain its meaning from what is beyond the human and is ineffable, which constitutes an ultimate kind of meaning. I spell out Bennett-Hunter’s rationale for making this claim, raise some objections to it, and in their wake articulate an alternative conception of ultimate meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    So suggest the comprehensive surveys of the English-speaking philosophical literature on life’s meaning in Seachris (2011); Mawson (2013); and Metz (2013a).

  2. 2.

    Such as Nagel (1987: 94-97); Levy (2005); and Mintoff (2008).

  3. 3.

    For a fresh and thorough discussion of aspect-seeing in the context of life’s meaning, see Hosseini (2015: 47-66).

  4. 4.

    For these and similar examples, see Metz (2013b: 5, 29, 30, 191–193, 201, 210, 221).

  5. 5.

    Alternately, the relational theorist might try to grant that the cases are ones of meaning, but appeal to the concept of an intrapersonal relationship (cf. Metz 2013b: 29–30).

  6. 6.

    One criticism that has already been made is to accept that meaning is relational, but to deny that a condition must obtain its meaning from another meaningful condition. Nozick himself ultimately maintains that a condition could obtain meaning insofar as it is related to something finally valuable that is not meaningful (1981: 610; see also Thomson 2003: 25–26). Indeed, in later work Nozick says, ‘The regress of meaning is stopped by reaching something with a kind of worth other than meaning—namely, reaching something of value’ (1989: 168).

  7. 7.

    Cooper likewise suspects that it is ‘inevitable’ that one will, or that one ‘must’, regress on meaningful conditions (2003: 126–127), and also claims that if one regresses thoroughly, then one ‘must’ reach the ineffable (2003: 136, 140).

References

  1. Affolter, J. (2007). Human nature as God’s purpose. Religious Studies, 43, 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baggini, J. (2004). What’s it all about?: Philosophy and the meaning of life. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett-Hunter, G. (2014). Ineffability and religious experience. London: Pickering & Chatto (Publishers) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bond, E. J. (1983). Reason and value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, D. (2003). Meaning. Durham: Acumen Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseini, R. (2015). Wittgenstein and meaning in life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kant, I. (1787). Critique of pure reason, 2nd edn. A. Wood and P. Guyer (Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

  8. Korsgaard, C. (1996). Creating the kingdom of ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy, N. (2005). Downshifting and meaning in life. Ratio, 18, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Markus, A. (2003). Assessing views of life: a subjective affair? Religious Studies, 39, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mawson, T. J. (2013). Recent work on the meaning of life and philosophy of religion. Philosophy Compass, 8, 1138–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. May, T. (2015). A significant life: Human meaning in a silent universe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Metz, T. (2002). Recent work on the meaning of life. Ethics, 112, 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Metz, T. (2013a). The meaning of life, rev. edn. In E. Zalta (Ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/.

  15. Metz, T. (2013b). Meaning in life: An analytic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Mintoff, J. (2008). Transcending absurdity. Ratio, 21, 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagel, T. (1987). What does it all mean? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nozick, R. (1989). The examined life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seachris, J. (2009). The meaning of life as narrative: a new proposal for interpreting philosophy’s ‘primary’ question. Philo, 12, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seachris, J. (2011). Meaning of life: Contemporary analytic perspectives. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.) Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/.

  22. Taylor, R. (1985). Ethics, faith, and reason. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas, L. (2005). Morality and a meaningful life. Philosophical Papers, 34, 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomson, G. (2003). On the meaning of life. South Melbourne: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waghorn, N. (2014). Nothingness and the meaning of life: Philosophical approaches to ultimate meaning through nothing and reflexivity. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wong, W. (2008). Meaningfulness and identities. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thaddeus Metz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metz, T. Is Life’s Meaning Ultimately Unthinkable?: Guy Bennett-Hunter on the Ineffable. Philosophia 44, 1247–1256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9654-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • God
  • Ineffability
  • Meaning of life
  • Philosophy of religion
  • Religious existentialism