, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 355–366 | Cite as

Moral Innocence as Illusion and Inability

  • Zachary J. GoldbergEmail author


The concept of moral innocence is frequently referenced in popular culture, ordinary language, literature, religious doctrine, and psychology. The morally innocent are often thought to be morally pure, incapable of wrongdoing, ignorant of morality, resistant to sin, or even saintly. In spite of, or perhaps because of this frequency of use the characterization of moral innocence continues to have varying connotations. As a result, the concept is often used without sufficient heed given to some of its most salient attributes, especially those germane to moral agency and the moral community. In this article I intend to identify these attributes and propose that moral innocence is best defined as an inability to enter the moral community as a result of a trust in moral illusions. The content of the illusions pertains to several factors including one’s role(s) in the moral community, one’s ability to wrong or harm others, the intricacies of one’s moral interaction with others, and the corresponding manifold complexities tangled up with the concepts of good and evil. Maintaining these illusions impedes or even prohibits an appropriate exchange of praise and blame with others. As membership in the moral community requires precisely this ability to engage in such an exchange, moral illusions necessarily give rise to an inability to participate in the moral community.


Moral innocence Moral community Moral illusion Moral imagination Moral agency Responsibility 


  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blake, W. (1789). Songs of innocence and songs of experience. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost. Accessed September 30, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Brontë, C. (1847). Wuthering heights. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost. Accessed September 30, 2014.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, R. (2011). Brilliance of a fire: innocence, experience, and the theory of childhood. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. French, P. (1975). ‘Seeing’ and ‘seeing that’, ‘observing’ and ‘observing that’. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series: Studies in Epistemology no. 9, 89–97.Google Scholar
  7. French, P. (1992). Responsibility matters. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbs, J. (2003). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J., Basinger, K., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the flies. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, P. (1988). Politics, innocence and the limits of goodness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kekes, J. (2006). The enlargement of life: Moral imagination at work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of moral development. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol 2, the psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  20. Langford, P. (1995). Approaches to the development of moral reasoning. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. McKenna, M. (2008). The loss of innocence and the things that remain. APA Newsletter, 7(2), 5–9.Google Scholar
  22. McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris, H. (1976). On guilt and innocence: Essays in legal philosophy and moral psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Munzer, S. (2012). Innocence. Faith and Philosophy, 29(2), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murdoch, I. (1976). The bell. St. Albans: Triad/Panther.Google Scholar
  26. Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Popper, S. (2013). Rethinking superhero and weapon play. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Slote, M. (1983). Goods and virtues. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  29. Slote, M. (2013). From enlightenment to receptivity: Rethinking our values. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strawson, P. (1974). Freedom and resentment and other essays. London: Meuthen.Google Scholar
  31. Urmson, J. O. (1958). Saints and heroes. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Watson, G. (1987). Responsibility and the limits of evil: Variations on a strawsonian theme. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Wolf, S. (1982). Moral saints. Journal of Philosophy, 79(8), 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolgast, E. (1993). Innocence. Philosophy, 68(265), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wordsworth, W. (1807). Ode: Intimations on immortality In Poems of William Wordsworth. Hoboken, N.J.: BiblioBytes. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost. Accessed September 30, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieUniversität RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations