Philosophia

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 885–901 | Cite as

What Role Should Propositions Have in the Theory of Meaning? Review Essay: Scott Soames. What is meaning?

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. ix, 132.
Book Review

References

  1. Davidson, D. (2001a). Radical Interpretation. In: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press. Original edition, 1973Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, D. (2001b). Reply to Foster. In: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press. Original edition, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Hanks, P. (2011). Structured propositions as types. Mind, 120, 11–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, truth, language, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2011). Truth and meaning redux. Philosophical Studies, 154, 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Soames, S. (2008). Truth and meaning: in perspective. Truth and Its Deformities: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations