, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 751–757 | Cite as

Attesting the Aristotelian Future



Aristotelian relativism about the future (as recently defended by MacFarlane (2003)) claims that a prediction made on Monday, such as ‘It will rain’, can be indeterminate on Monday but determinate on Tuesday. A serious objection to this intuitively appealing view is that it cannot coherently be attested: for if it is attested on Monday, then our blindness to what the future holds precludes attesting that the prediction is determinate on Tuesday, and if it is attested on Tuesday (when, suppose, it rains), then the fact that it rains precludes attesting that the prediction is indeterminate on Monday. In this paper, I focus on Moruzzi and Wright (2009)’s recent development of this objection and argue that it fails. This result removes a major obstacle to defending the Aristotelian view.


Open future Aristotelianism Trumping Relativism about truth 


  1. Aristotle. (1984). De Interpretatione. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. MacFarlane, J. (2003). Future contingents and relative truth. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. MacFarlane, J. (2008). Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths. In M. Kolbel & M. Garcia-Carpintero (Eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Moruzzi, S., & Wright, C. (2009). Trumping assessments and the Aristotelian future. Synthese, 166, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations