Philosophia

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 457–473 | Cite as

Debating Forgiveness: A Reply to My Critics

Article

Abstract

In this essay I offer a detailed reply to three critics (whose commentaries are included in this issue of Philosophia) of my Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). The topics explored include the nature and limits of forgiveness; its unconditional or conditional character; the problem of distinguishing between central and marginal cases; the analysis of political apology; and questions of philosophical methodology.

Keywords

Forgiveness Unconditional forgiveness Conditional forgiveness Paradigm cases Excuse Condonation Clemency Mercy Reconciliation Anger Moral ideals Virtue theory Secular and religious approaches Analytical strategy 

References

  1. Bash, A. (2007). Forgiveness and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, J. (1896). The works of Joseph Butler, D.C.L. W. E. Gladstone (Ed.), 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kraybill, D. B., Nolt, S. M., & Weaver-Zercher, D. L. (2007). Amish grace: How forgiveness transcended tragedy. San Francisco: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Murphy, J. (2003). Getting even: Forgiveness and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1998). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Strawson, P. F. (1980). Freedom and resentment. In Freedom and resentment and other essays (pp. 1–25). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations