Skip to main content
Log in

“Moderate Animal Liberationism”: Tactical Breakthrough or Dead End?

Ethics and the Beast, by Tzachi Zamir. Princeton University Press, 2007. Hardback, 158 pages, $35US

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bentham, J. (1948). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, B. (2004). The rights of animals. In A. Linzey & B. Clarke (Eds.), Animal rights: A historical anthology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godlovitch, S., Godlovitch, R., & Harris, J. (Eds.) (1971). In Animals, men, and morals: An inquiry into the maltreatment of non-humans. New York: Evergreen.

  • Mill, J. S. (2002). The basic writings of John Stuart Mill. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights, updated with a new preface. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. D. (2005). All beings that feel pain deserve human rights. The Guardian, April 6. http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,1543799,00.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norm Phelps.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phelps, N. “Moderate Animal Liberationism”: Tactical Breakthrough or Dead End?. Philosophia 36, 389–398 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9119-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9119-7

Keywords

Navigation