Skip to main content
Log in

Systemic risk governance in a dynamical model of a banking system with stochastic assets and liabilities

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of governing systemic risk in an assets–liabilities dynamical model of a banking system. In the model considered, each bank is represented by its assets and liabilities. The net worth of a bank is the difference between its assets and liabilities and bank is solvent when its net worth is greater than or equal to zero; otherwise, the bank has failed. The banking system dynamics is defined by an initial value problem for a system of stochastic differential equations whose independent variable is time and whose dependent variables are the assets and liabilities of the banks. The banking system model presented generalizes those discussed in Fouque and Sun (in: Fouque, Langsam (eds) Handbook of systemic risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 444–452, 2013) and Fatone and Mariani (J Glob Optim 75(3):851–883, 2019) and describes a homogeneous population of banks. The main features of the model are a cooperation mechanism among banks and the possibility of the (direct) intervention of the monetary authority in the banking system dynamics. By “systemic risk” or “systemic event” in a bounded time interval, we mean that in that time interval at least a given fraction of banks have failed. The probability of systemic risk in a bounded time interval is evaluated via statistical simulation. Systemic risk governance aims to maintain the probability of systemic risk in a bounded time interval between two given thresholds. The monetary authority is responsible for systemic risk governance. The governance consists in the choice of assets and liabilities of a kind of “ideal bank” as functions of time and in the choice of the rules for the cooperation mechanism among banks. These rules are obtained by solving an optimal control problem for the pseudo mean field approximation of the banking system model. Governance induces banks in the system to behave like the “ideal bank”. Shocks acting on the banks’ assets or liabilities are simulated. Numerical examples of systemic risk governance in the presence and absence of shocks acting on the banking system are studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya V, Yorulmazer T (2008) Information contagion and bank herding. J Money Credit Bank 40:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi S, Tedeschi G (2017) From banks strategies to financial (in)stability. Int Rev Econ Finance 47:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagini F, Fouque JP, Frittelli M, Meyer-Brandis T (2019a) A unified approach to systemic risk measures via acceptance sets. Math Finance 29(1):329–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagini F, Mazzon A, Meyer-Brandis T (2019b) Financial asset bubbles in banking networks. SIAM J Financ Math 10(2):430–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caccioli F, Catanach TA, Farmer JD (2012) Heterogeneity, correlations and financial contagion. Adv Complex Syst 15(Supp02):1250058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caccioli F, Shrestha M, Moore C, Farmer JD (2014) Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios. J Bank Finance 46:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona R, Fouque JP, Sun LH (2015) Mean field games and systemic risk. Commun Math Sci 13(4):911–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DW, Rajan RG (2000) A theory of bank capital. J Finance 55(6):2431–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisert T, Eufingerbi C (2014) Interbank network and bank bailouts: insurance mechanism for non-insured creditors? SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatone L, Mariani F (2019) Systemic risk governance in a dynamical model of a banking system. J Glob Optim 75(3):851–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouque JP, Ichiba T (2013) Stability in a model of interbank lending. SIAM J Financ Math 4(1):784–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouque JP, Langsam J (eds) (2013) Handbook of systemic risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouque JP, Sun LH (2013) Systemic risk illustrated. In: Fouque JP, Langsam J (eds) Handbook of systemic risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 444–452

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gallavotti G (1999) Statistical mechanics: a short treatise. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J, Papanicolaou G, Yang TW (2013) Large deviations for a mean field model of systemic risk. SIAM J Financ Math 4:151–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli R, Tedeschi G, Gallegati M (2014) Bank interlinkages and macroeconomic stability. Int Rev Econ Finance 34:72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli R, Iori G, Stamboglis N, Tedeschi G (2017) A networked economy: a survey on the effect of interaction in credit markets. In: Introduction to agent-based economics, chapter 10. Elsevier, pp 229–252

  • Haldane AG, May RM (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469:351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd TR (2016) Contagion! Systemic risk in financial networks. Springer briefs in quantitative finance. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iori G, Jafarey S, Padilla FG (2006) Systemic risk on the interbank market. J Econ Behav Org 61(4):525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolosov GE (1999) Optimal design of control systems: stochastic and deterministic problems. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzu S, Tedeschi G (2012) Systemic risk on different interbank network topologies. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 391(18):4331–4341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Nimalan A (2010) Systemic risk: the dynamics of model banking systems. J R Soc Interface 7:823–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Levin SA, Sugihara G (2008) Complex systems: ecology for bankers. Nature 451:893–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukuddem-Petersen J, Petersen MA (2006) Bank management via stochastic optimal control. Automatica 42:1395–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukuddem-Petersen J, Petersen MA (2008) Optimizing asset and capital adequacy management in banking. J Optim Theory Appl 137(1):205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LCG, Veraart LAM (2013) Faliure and rescue in an interbank network. Manag Sci 59(4):882–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun LH (2018) Systemic risk and interbank lending. J Optim Theory Appl 179(2):400–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi G, Mazloumian A, Gallegati M, Helbing D (2012) Bankruptcy cascades in interbank markets. PLoS ONE 7(12):e52749

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Mariani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatone, L., Mariani, F. Systemic risk governance in a dynamical model of a banking system with stochastic assets and liabilities. J Econ Interact Coord 15, 183–219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-019-00277-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-019-00277-y

Navigation