Abstract
In recent years, a growing literature has claimed that the market microstructure is sufficient to generate the so-called stylized facts without any reference to the behaviour of market players. Indeed, qualitative stylized-facts can be generated with zero-intelligence traders (ZITs) but we stress that they are without any quantitative predictive power. In this paper we show that in most of the cases, such qualitative stylized facts hide unrealistic price motions at the intraday level and ill-calibrated return processes as well. To generate realistic price motions and return series with adequate quantitative values is out-of-reach using pure ZIT populations. To do so, one must increasingly constrain agents’ choices to a point where it is hard to claim that their behaviour is completely random. In addition we show that even with highly constrained ZIT agents, one cannot reproduce real time series from these. Except in a few cases, first order moments of ZITs never equal real data ones. We therefore claim that stylized facts produced by means of ZIT agents are useless for financial engineering.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral L, Cizeau P, Gopikrishnan P, Liu Y, Meyer M, Peng CK, Stanley H (1999) Econophysics: can statistical physics contribute to the science of economics?. Comput Phys Commun 121–122: 145–152
Becker GS (1962) Irrational behavior and economic theory. J Polit Econ 70(3): 1–13
Bottazzi G, Devetag G, Ponta F (2011) Does volatility matter? Expectations of price return and variability in an asset pricing experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 77: 124–146
Cliff D, Bruten J, Road F (1997) Zero is not enough: on the lower limit of agent intelligence for continuous double auction markets. Technical report of the Hewlett-Packard Laboratories. HPL-97-141
Cont R (2000) Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Qaunt Finance 1(2001): 223–236
Duffy J (2006) Agent-based models and human subject experiments. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, handbook of computational economics, vol 2, chap. 19, Elsevier, pp 949–1011
Farmer J, Patelli P, Zovko I (2005) The predictive power of zero intelligence in financial markets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(324): 2254–2259
Fligner M, Policello G (1981) Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. J Am Stat Assoc 76(373): 162–168
Foucault T (1999) Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market. J Financ Mark 2(2): 99–134
Gode DK, Sunder S (1993) Allocative efficiency of market with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J Polit Econ 101(1): 119–137
Handa P, Schwartz RA (2006) The limit order effect. J Financ 125(5): 094302
Hommes CH (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, handbook of computational economics, vol 2, chap. 23. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1109–1186
Johnson N (1949) Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 1–2(36): 149–176
King R, Smith V, Williams A, Boening MV (1993) The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental stock markets. In: Dall R, Chen P (eds) Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 183–200
Kirchler M, Huber J (2007) Fat tails and volatility clustering in experimental asset markets. J Econ Dyn Control 31: 1844–1874
Ladley D, Schenk-Hoppe KR (2009) Do stylised facts of order book markets need strategic behaviour?. J Econ Dyn Control 33(4): 817–831
Le Baron B (2006) Handbook of computational economics. Agent-based computational finance, vol 2, (C 24), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1187–1232
Le Baron B, Arthur WB, Palmer R (1999) Time series properties of an artificial stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 23(9–10): 1487–1516
Levy H, Solomon S, Levy M (2000) Microscopic simulation of financial markets: from investor behavior to market phenomena. Academic Press, Orlando
Liu X, Gregor S, Yang J (2008) The effects of behavioral and structural assumptions in artificial stock market. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 387: 2535–2546
Lux T (2009) Stochastic behavioral asset-pricing models and the stylized facts. In: Hens T, Schenk-Hopp KR (eds) Handbook of financial markets: dynamics and evolution. North-Holland, San Diego, pp 161–215
Maslov S (2000) Simple model of a limit order driven market. Phys A 278: 571–578
Mathieu P, Brandouy O (2010) A generic architecture for realistic simulations of complex financial dynamics. In: Practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems, 8th edn. Salamanca
Plott C, Sunder S (1982) Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: an application of rational expectation models. J Polit Econ 90: 663–698
Smith VL (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behavior. J Polit Econ 70(3): 322
Smith VL, Suchanek GL, Williams AW (1988) Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica 56(5): 1119–1151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to thank funding from the Institut Mines-Telecom, grant “Future and rupture”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandouy, O., Corelli, A., Veryzhenko, I. et al. A re-examination of the “zero is enough” hypothesis in the emergence of financial stylized facts. J Econ Interact Coord 7, 223–248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0099-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0099-0