Skip to main content
Log in

Volatility clustering and herding agents: does it matter what they observe?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent agent-based models have demonstrated that agents’ herding behavior causes volatility clustering in stock markets. We examine economies where agents herd on others, yet they have limited sets of information on other agents to imitate. In particular, we conduct experiments on economies with agents with different levels of information sharing where agents can imitate: (1) the strategies of others but with an error, (2) the strategies of only a fraction of agents, or (3) the strategies of others, but update their parameters only by a proportion. In each experiment we change the likelihood that agents make errors to copy the strategy of others, the fraction of agents to herd, or the proportion of the parameter that agents update, in order to examine the effect of the different degrees of information sharing on volatility clustering. We show that volatility clustering tends to disappear when agents have limited information on the strategies of others, and agents need to imitate the strategy details of others in order to generate the clustered volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apesteguia J, Huck S, Oechssler J (2007) Imitation—theory and experimental evidence. J Econ Theor 136: 217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur B, Holland J, LeBaron B, Palmer R, Tayler P (1997) Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In: Arthur WB, Steven ND, David A (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornholdt S (2001) Expectation bubbles in a spin model of markets: intermittency from frustration across scales. Int J Mod Phys C 12: 667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T (2006) Agent learning representation: advice on modelling economic learning. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2: agent-based computational economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 895–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Hommes C (1998) Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. J Econ Dyn Control 22: 1235–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Hommes C, Wagener F (2005) Evolutionary dynamics in markets with many trader types. J Math Econ 41: 7–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Yeh C (2001) Evolving traders and the business school with genetic programming: a new architecture of the agent-based artificial stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 25: 363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comerton-Forde C, Rydge J (2006) The current state of Asia-Pacific stock exchanges: a critical review of market design. Pacific-Basin Finan J 14: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury D, Stauffer D (1999) A generalized spin model of financial markets. Eur Phys J B 8: 477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JB, Shleifer A, Summers LH, Waldmann RJ (1990) Noise trader risk in financial markets. J Polit Econ 98: 703–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JB, Shleifer A, Summers LH, Waldmann RJ (1990) Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation. J Finan 45: 379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle R (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50: 987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S, Stiglitz J (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70: 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunersdorfer A, Hommes C (2005) A nonlinear structural model for volatility clustering. In: Teyssiere G, Kirman A (eds) Long memory in economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev 80: 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaizoji T, Bornholdt S, Fujiwara Y (2002) Dynamics of price and trading volume in a spin model of stock markets with heterogeneous agents. Physica A 316: 441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman A (1991) Epidemics of opinion and speculative bubbles in financial markets. In: Taylor M (ed) Money and financial markets. Macmillan

  • Kirman A, Teyssière G (2002) Microeconomic models for long memory in the volatility of financial time series. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econometrics 5(4): 281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B (2001) Evolution and time horizons in an agent based stock market. Macroecon Dyn 5(2): 225–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B (2006) Agent-based computational finance. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2: agent-based computational economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1187–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B, Arthur B, Palmer R (1999) Time series properties of an artificial stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 23: 1487–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B, Yamamoto R (2007) Long-memory in an order-driven market. Physica A 383: 85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B, Yamamoto R (2008) The impact of imitation on long-memory in an order-driven market. East Econ J 34: 504–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui Y, Mole D (1998) The use of fundamental and technical analysis by foreign exchange dealers: Hong Kong evidence. J Int Money Finan 17: 535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux T (1998) The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distribution. J Econ Behav Organ 33: 143–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux T, Marchesi M (1999) Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature 397: 498–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux T (2009) Rational forecasts or social opinion dynamics? Identification of interaction effects in a business climate survey. J Econ Behav Organ 72: 638–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkhoff L, Taylor M (2007) The obstinate passion of foreign exchange professionals: technical analysis. J Econ Lit 45: 936–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhlenbein H, Schlierkamp-Voosen D (1993) Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm. Evol Comput 1(1): 25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offerman T, Sonnemans J (1998) Learning by experience and learning by imitating successful others. J Econ Behav Organ 34: 559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagan A (1996) The Econometrics of Financial Markets. J Emp Finan 3: 15–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingle M, Day R (1996) Modes of economizing behavior: Experimental evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 29: 191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routledge B (1999) Adaptive learning in financial markets. Rev Finan Stud 12: 1165–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller R (2001) Exuberant reporting. Harv Int Rev 23(1): 60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 69: 493–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriend N (2000) An Illustration of the Essential Difference Between Individual and Social Learning, and its Consequences for Computational Analysis. J Econ Dyn Cont 24: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto R, LeBaron B (2010) Order-splitting and long-memory in an order-driven market. Eur Phys J B 73: 51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichi Yamamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, R. Volatility clustering and herding agents: does it matter what they observe?. J Econ Interact Coord 6, 41–59 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-010-0075-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-010-0075-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation