Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of a market with heterogeneous learning agents

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a simple market model of heterogeneous interacting agents. There are two types of agents, consumers and firms, who are boundedly rational in the sense that they only have partial information. The consumers have a given amount of income at each time period. They determine from which firm to purchase goods, and then spend all the income to purchase as much as they can. The amount of goods they can obtain depends not only on the price offered by the firm but also the amount produced by the firm and the number of customers of the firm. We employ a statistical description of consumers’ behavior. The Bolzmann distribution is used to represent firms’ share distribution of consumers, which is characterized by a parameter (called “temperature” in physical systems) describing how greedily the consumers pursue higher utility. The firm does not know the shape of demand function it faces, so it revises production and price so as to raise its profit with the aid of a simple reinforcement learning rule which is applied to the “one-armed bandit” problem. Numerical simulations show that there is an optimal greediness, which maximize the time average of consumers’ utility. In the vicinity of the optimal greediness, oligopoly emerges although its membership changes frequently. In an oligopolistic market, the market share distribution of firms follows Zipf’s law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoyama H (2004) Scaling laws of income and firm-size. Presentation at workshop on economics with heterogeneous interacting agents (WEHIA)

  • Aoyama H et al (2007) Pareto firms. Nippon Keizai Hyoron-sha (in Japanese)

  • Axtell R (2001) Zipf distribution of US firm sizes. Science 293: 1818–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder K, Heermann DW (1979) Monte Carlo methods in statistical physics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchaud J-P, Mèzard M (2000) Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy. Physica A 282: 536–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw ND et al (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441: 876–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara Y et al (2004) Do Pareto-Zipf and Gibrat laws hold true. Physica A 335: 197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindahl OC (1950) Concentration in the steel industry. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Columbia University

  • Hirschman AO (1964) The paternity of an index. Am Econ Rev 54: 761–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman A, Zimmermann J-B (eds) (2001) Economics with heterogeneous interacting agents. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Namatame A (ed) et al (2006) The complex networks of economic interactions: essays in agent-based economics and econophysics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Onozaki T, Yanagita T (2003) Monopoly, oligopoly and the invisible hand. Chaos Solit Fract 18: 537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuo Yanagita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yanagita, T., Onozaki, T. Dynamics of a market with heterogeneous learning agents. J Econ Interac Coord 3, 107–118 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-008-0038-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-008-0038-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation