Skip to main content
Log in

Facebook and Tencent Data Fit a Cube Law Better than Metcalfe’s Law

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metcalfe ’s law states that the value of a network grows as the square of the number of its users (Vn2), which was validated by actual data of Facebook and Tencent in 2013–2015. Since then, the users and the values of Facebook and Tencent have increased significantly. Is Metcalfe’s law still valid? This paper leverages the latest data of Facebook and Tencent to fit the network effect laws and makes the following observations: 1) actual data of network values fit a cube law (Vn2) better than Metcalfe’s law; 2) actual data of network costs fit a cube law; 3) actual data of network sizes show a growth trend matching the netoid function well. We also discuss the underlying factors affecting such observations and the generality of the network effect laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gilder G. Metcalf’s law and legacy. Forbes ASAP, 1993, 152(6): 158-159. https://www.discovery.org/a/41/, Mar. 2023.

  2. Swann G M P. The functional form of network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 2002, 14(3): 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00051-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Briscoe B, Odlyzko A, Tilly B. Metcalfe’s law is wrong—Communications networks increase in value as they add members—But by how much? IEEE Spectrum, 2006, 43(7): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2006.1653003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Hove L. Metcalfe’s law: Not so wrong after all. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 2014, 15(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9084-1.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Metcalfe B. Metcalfe’s law after 40 years of Ethernet. Computer, 2013, 46(12): 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang X Z, Liu J J, Xu Z W. Tencent and Facebook data validate Metcalfe’s law. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2015, 30(2): 246-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1518-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helmond A, Nieborg D B, Van Der Vlist F N. Facebook’s evolution: Development of a platform-as-infrastructure. Internet Histories, 2019, 3(2): 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2019.1593667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Z H, Liu G, Ji Z Y, Zimmermann R. Towards cost-effective cloud downloading with Tencent big data. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2015, 30(6): 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1591-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reed D P. That sneaky exponential—Beyond Metcalfe’s law to the power of community building, 2009. https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENREF/C030200R.pdf, November 2022.

  10. Van Hove L. Metcalfe’s law and network quality: An extension of Zhang et al. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2016, 31(1): 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-016-1615-9.

  11. Van Hove L. Testing Metcalfe’s law: Pitfalls and possibilities. Information Economics and Policy, 2016, 37: 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alabi K. Digital blockchain networks appear to be following Metcalfe’s Law. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2017, 24: 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson T. Metcalfe's law as a model for Bitcoin's value. Alternative Investment Analyst Review, 2018, 7(2): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3078248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y H. Industrial Internet and the new industrial revolution. Communications of the CCF, 2021, 17(8): 7. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weis J W, Jacobson J M. Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(10): 1300-1307. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00907-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeung C M A, Liccardi I, Lu K H, Seneviratne O, Berners-Lee T. Decentralization: The future of online social networking. In Proc. W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking Position Papers, Jan. 2009, pp.2–7. https://www.w3.org/2008/09/msnws/papers/decentralization.pdf, Nov. 2022.

  17. Mansour E, Sambra A V, Hawke S et al. A demonstration of the solid platform for social web applications. In Proc. the 25th Int. Conf. Companion on World Wide Web, Apr. 2016, pp.223–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890529.

  18. Srinivasan D. The antitrust case against Facebook: A monopolist's journey towards pervasive surveillance in spite of consumers' preference for privacy. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 2019, 16(1): 39-101.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Y. Monopoly and anti-monopoly in China today. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2019, 78(5): 1101-1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Z H, Christo W, Xu T Y, Liu Y, Lu Z, Wang Y L. Offline downloading in China: A comparative study. In Proc. the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference, Oct. 2015, pp.473–486. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815688.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xing-Zhou Zhang.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 1170 kb)

ESM 2

(MP4 145319 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, XZ., Xu, ZW. Facebook and Tencent Data Fit a Cube Law Better than Metcalfe’s Law. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 38, 219–227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-2845-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-2845-7

Keywords

Navigation