Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Jupiter Made Abstract, and Then Refined

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative text editing systems allow multiple users to concurrently edit the same document, which can be modeled by a replicated list object. In the literature, there is a family of operational transformation (OT)-based Jupiter protocols for replicated lists, including AJupiter, XJupiter, and CJupiter. They are hard to understand due to the subtle OT technique, and little work has been done on formal verification of complete Jupiter protocols. Worse still, they use quite different data structures. It is unclear about how they are related to each other, and it would be laborious to verify each Jupiter protocol separately. In this work, we make contributions towards a better understanding of Jupiter protocols and the relation among them. We first identify the key OT issue in Jupiter and present a generic solution. We summarize several techniques for carrying out the solution, including the data structures to maintain OT results and to guide OTs. Then, we propose an implementation-independent AbsJupiter protocol. Finally, we establish the (data) refinement relation among these Jupiter protocols (AbsJupiter included). We also formally specify and verify the family of Jupiter protocols and the refinement relation among them using TLA+ (TLA stands for “Temporal Logic of Actions”) and the TLC model checker. To our knowledge, this is the first work to formally specify and verify a family of OT-based Jupiter protocols and the refinement relation among them. It would be helpful to promote a rigorous study of OT-based protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellis C A, Gibbs S J. Concurrency control in groupware systems. In Proc. the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, May 1989, pp.399-407.

  2. Attiya H, Burckhardt S, Gotsman A, Morrison A, Yang H, Zawirski M. Specification and complexity of collaborative text editing. In Proc. the 2016 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, July 2016, pp.259-268.

  3. Nichols D A, Curtis P, Dixon M, Lamping J. High-latency, low-bandwidth windowing in the Jupiter collaboration system. In Proc. the 8th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface and Software Technology, November 1995, pp.111-120.

  4. Xu Y, Sun C, Li M. Achieving convergence in operational transformation: Conditions, mechanisms and systems. In Proc. the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 2014, pp.505-518.

  5. Shapiro M, Preguiça N, Baquero C, Zawirski M. Conflict-free replicated data types. In Proc. the 13th International Conference on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems, October 2011, pp.386-400.

  6. Wei H, Huang Y, Lu J. Specification and implementation of replicated list: The Jupiter protocol revisited. In Proc. the 22nd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems, December 2018, Article No. 12.

  7. Sun C, Ellis C. Operational transformation in real-time group editors: Issues, algorithms, and achievements. In Proc. the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 1998, pp.59-68.

  8. Ressel M, Nitsche-Ruhland D, Gunzenhäuser R. An integrating, transformation-oriented approach to concurrency control and undo in group editors. In Proc. the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 1996, pp.288-297.

  9. Imine A, Rusinowitch M, Oster G, Molli P. Formal design and verification of operational transformation algorithms for copies convergence. Theor. Comput. Sci., 2006, 351(2): 167-183.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Randolph A, Boucheneb H, Imine A, Quintero A. On consistency of operational transformation approach. In Proc. the 14th International Workshop on Verification of Infinite-State Systems, August 2012, pp.45-59.

  11. Randolph A, Boucheneb H, Imine A, Quintero A. On synthesizing a consistent operational transformation approach. IEEE Trans. Computers, 2015, 64(4): 1074-1089.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoare C A. Proof of correctness of data representations. Acta Inf., 1972, 1(4): 271-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamport L, Merz S. Auxiliary variables in TLA+. arXiv:1703.05121, 2017. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.051-21.pdf, Sept. 2020.

  14. Lamport L. If you’re not writing a program, don’t use a programming language. Bulletin of the EATCS, 2018, 125: Article No. 7.

  15. Lamport L. Specifying Systems: The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers (1st edition). Addison-Wesley Professional, 2002.

  16. Yu Y, Manolios P, Lamport L. Model checking TLA+ specifications. In Proc. the 10th IFIP WG 10.5 Advanced Research Working Conference on Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods, September 1999, pp.54-66.

  17. Hong W, Chen Z, Yu H, Wang J. Evaluation of model checkers by verifying message passing programs. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, 2019, 62(10): Article No. 200101.

  18. Lamport L. The temporal logic of actions. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 1994, 16(3): 872-923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abadi M, Lamport L. The existence of refinement mappings. Theor. Comput. Sci., 1991, 82(2): 253-284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun D, Sun C. Context-based operational transformation in distributed collaborative editing systems. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 2009, 20(10): 1454-1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan D, Luo Y, Zhuang X, Rodrigues G R, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Jain P U, Stumm M. Simple testing can prevent most critical failures: An analysis of production failures in distributed data-intensive systems. In Proc. the 11th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, October 2014, pp.249-265.

  22. Li D, Li R. An approach to ensuring consistency in peer-to-peer real-time group editors. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2008, 17(5/6): 553-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhang S J, Sun C. Formal verification of operational transformation. In Proc. the 19th International Symposium on Formal Methods, May 2014, pp.432-448.

  24. Sun C, Xu Y, Agustina A. Exhaustive search of puzzles in operational transformation. In Proc. the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 2014, pp.519-529.

  25. Sinchuk S, Chuprikov P, Solomatov K. Verified operational transformation for trees. In Proc. the 7th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving, August 2016, pp.358-373.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Heng-Feng Wei, Rui-Ze Tang, Yu Huang & Jian Lv

Authors
  1. Heng-Feng Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui-Ze Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Huang.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 427 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, HF., Tang, RZ., Huang, Y. et al. Jupiter Made Abstract, and Then Refined. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 35, 1343–1364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-020-0516-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-020-0516-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation