Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CoC: A Unified Distributed Ledger Based Supply Chain Management System

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern supply chain is a complex system and plays an important role for different sectors under the globalization economic integration background. Supply chain management system is proposed to handle the increasing complexity and improve the efficiency of flows of goods. It is also useful to prevent potential frauds and guarantee trade compliance. Currently, most companies maintain their own IT systems for supply chain management. However, it is hard for these isolated systems to work together and provide a global view of the status of the highly distributed supply chain system. Using emerging decentralized ledger/blockchain technology, which is a special type of distributed system in essence, to build supply chain management system is a promising direction to go. Decentralized ledger usually suffers from low performance and lack of capability to protect information stored on the ledger. To overcome these challenges, we propose CoC (supply chain on blockchain), a novel supply chain management system based on a hybrid decentralized ledger with a novel two-step block construction mechanism. We also design an efficient storage scheme and information protection method that satisfy requirements of supply chain management. These techniques can also be applied to other decentralized ledger based applications with requirements similar to supply chain management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laseter T, Oliver K. When will supply chain management grow up? Strategy + Business, 2003. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/03304, Jan. 2018.

  2. Dai J, Ding Z M, Xu J J. Context-based moving object trajectory uncertainty reduction and ranking in road network. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2016, 31(1): 167-184.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu H L, Chen Q, Li Z H. Optimization techniques for RFID complex event processing. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2009, 24(4): 723-733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He W, Tan E L, Lee E W, Li T Y. A solution for integrated track and trace in supply chain based on RFID & GPS. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, September 2009.

  5. Lindner M, Marquez F G, Chapman C, Clayman S, Henriksson D, Elmroth E. The cloud supply chain: A framework for information, monitoring, accounting and billing. In Proc. the 2nd Int. ICST Conf. Cloud Computing, October 2010.

  6. Gazet A. Comparative analysis of various ransomware virii. Journal in Computer Virology, 2010, 6(1): 77-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garay J, Kiayias A, Leonardos N. The Bitcoin backbone protocol: Analysis and applications. In Proc. the 34th Annual Int. Conf. the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, April 2015, pp.281-310.

  8. Lemieux V L. Trusting records: Is blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal, 2016, 26(2): 110-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morabito V. Blockchain practices. In Business Innovation Through Blockchain: The B 3 Perspective, Morabito V (ed.), Springer, 2017, pp.145-166.

  10. Lehmacher W. Global dynamics and key trends. In The Global Supply Chain: How Technology and Circular Thinking Transform Our Future, Lehmacher W (ed.), Springer, 2017, pp.67-112.

  11. Cooper M C, Lambert D M, Pagh J D. Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1997, 8(1): 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox M S, Chionglo J F, Barbuceanu M. The integrated supply chain management system. Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 1993.

  13. Buterin V. What proof of stake is and why it matters. Bitcoin Magazine, 2013. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/what-proof-of-stake-is-and-why-it-matters-1377531463, Jan. 2018.

  14. Xu X W, Pautasso C, Zhu L M, Gramoli V, Ponomarev A, Tran A B, Chen S P. The blockchain as a software connector. In Proc the 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. Software Architecture, April 2016, pp.182-191.

  15. Castro M, Liskov B. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Trans. Computer Systems, 2002, 20(4): 398-461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamport L, Shostak R, Pease M. The Byzantine Generals Problem. ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems, 1982, 4(3): 382-401.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kermarrec A M, van Steen M. Gossiping in distributed systems. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2007, 41(5): 2-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamport L. The part-time parliament. ACM Trans. Computer Systems, 1998, 16(2): 133-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eyal I, Gencer A E, Sirer E G, van Renesse R. Bitcoin-NG: A scalable blockchain protocol. In Proc. the 13th USENIX Conf. Networked Systems Design and Implementation, March 2016, pp.45-59.

  20. Lewison K, Corella F. Backing rich credentials with a blockchain PKI. Technical Report, Pomcor, 2016. https://pomcor.com/techreports/BlockchainPKI.pdf, Jan. 2018.

  21. Al-Bassam M. SCPKI: A smart contract-based PKI and identity system. In Proc. the ACM Workshop on Blockchain Cryptocurrencies and Contracts, April 2017, pp.35-40.

  22. Xu L, Wu X X, Zhang X W. CL-PRE: A certificateless proxy re-encryption scheme for secure data sharing with public cloud. In Proc. the 7th ACM Symp. Information Computer and Communications Security, May 2012, pp.87-88.

  23. Bethencourt J, Sahai A, Waters B. Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Security and Privacy, May 2007, pp.321-334.

  24. Vukolić M. The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-work vs. BFT replication. In Proc. the Int. Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security, October 2015, pp.112-125.

  25. Vukolić M. Rethinking permissioned blockchains. In Proc. the ACM Workshop on Blockchain Cryptocurrencies and Contracts, April 2017, pp.3-7.

  26. Guerraoui R, Knežević N, Quéma V, Vukolić M. The next 700 BFT protocols. In Proc. the 5th European Conf. Computer Systems, April 2010, pp.363-376.

  27. Kotla R, Dahlin M. High throughput Byzantine fault tolerance. In Proc. Int. Conf. Dependable Systems and Networks, July 2004, pp.575-584.

  28. Croman K, Decker C, Eyal I, Gencer A E, Juels A, Kosba A, Miller A, Saxena P, Shi E, Sirer E G, Song D, Wattenhofer R. On scaling decentralized blockchains. In Proc. Int. Conf. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, February 2016, pp.106-125.

  29. Cachin C. Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In Proc. the Workshop on Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers, July 2016.

  30. Wood T, Singh R, Venkataramani A, Shenoy P, Cecchet E. ZZ and the art of practical BFT execution. In Proc. the 6th Conf. Computer Systems, April 2011, pp.123-138.

  31. Korpela K, Hallikas J, Dahlberg T. Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration. In Proc. the 50th Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, Jan. 2017, pp.4182-4191.

  32. Tian F. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In Proc. the 13th Int. Conf. Service Systems and Service Management, June 2016, pp.1-6.

  33. Abeyratne S A, Monfared R P. Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2016, 5(9): 1-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Milutinovic M, He W, Wu H, Kanwal M. Proof of luck: An efficient blockchain consensus protocol. In Proc. the 1st Workshop on System Software for Trusted Execution, Dec. 2016, Article No. 2.

  35. Intel. Blockchain and its emerging role in healthcare and health-related research. Technical Report 4150-45-P, 2016. https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2016-16133.pdf, Jan. 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 77204-3010, U.S.A.

    Zhimin Gao, Lei Xu, Lin Chen, Yang Lu & Weidong Shi

  2. School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

    Xi Zhao

Authors
  1. Zhimin Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yang Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weidong Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhimin Gao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1617 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Z., Xu, L., Chen, L. et al. CoC: A Unified Distributed Ledger Based Supply Chain Management System. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33, 237–248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1816-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1816-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation