Skip to main content
Log in

Tencent and Facebook Data Validate Metcalfe’s Law

  • Short Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript


In 1980s, Robert Metcalfe, the inventor of Ethernet, proposed a formulation of network value in terms of the network size (the number of nodes of the network), which was later named as Metcalfe’s law. The law states that the value V of a network is proportional to the square of the size n of the network, i.e., Vn 2. Metcalfe’s law has been influential and an embodiment of the network effect concept. It also generated many controversies. Some scholars went so far as to state “Metcalfe’s law is wrong” and “dangerous”. Some other laws have been proposed, including Sarnoff’s law (Vn), Odlyzko’s law (Vnlog(n)), and Reed’s law (V ∝ 2n). Despite these arguments, for 30 years, no evidence based on real data was available for or against Metcalfe’s law. The situation was changed in late 2013, when Metcalfe himself used Facebook’s data over the past 10 years to show a good fit for Metcalfe’s law. In this paper, we expand Metcalfe’s results by utilizing the actual data of Tencent (China’s largest social network company) and Facebook (the world’s largest social network company). Our results show that: 1) of the four laws of network effect, Metcalfe’s law by far fits the actual data the best; 2) both Tencent and Facebook data fit Metcalfe’s law quite well; 3) the costs of Tencent and Facebook are proportional to the squares of their network sizes, not linear; and 4) the growth trends of Tencent and Facebook monthly active users fit the netoid function well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Bond R M, Fariss C J, Jones J J, Kramer A D I, Marlow C, Settle J E, Fowler J H. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 295–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ormerod P. Social networks can spread the Olympic effect. Nature, 2012, 489(7416): 337–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Swann G M. The functional form of network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 2002, 14(3): 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briscoe B, Odlyzko A, Tilly B. Metcalfe’s law is wrong. IEEE Spectrum, 2006, 43(7): 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilder G. Metcalf’s law and legacy. Forbes ASAP, 1993, 152(6): 158–159.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reed D P. That Sneaky exponential — Beyond Metcalfe’s law to the power of community building. Context Magazine, 1999, 2(1)., Jan. 2015.

  7. Madureira A, den Hartog F, Bouwman H, Baken N. Empirical validation of Metcalfe’s law: How Internet usage patterns have changed over time. Information Economics and Policy, 2013, 25(4): 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Metcalfe B. Metcalfe’s law after 40 years of Ethernet. IEEE Computer, 2013, 46(12): 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Hove L. Metcalfe’s law: Not so wrong after all. NET-NOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 2014, 15(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xing-Zhou Zhang.

Additional information

Special Section on Applications and Industry

The work was supported by the Guangdong Talents Program of China under Grant No. 201001D0104726115.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, XZ., Liu, JJ. & Xu, ZW. Tencent and Facebook Data Validate Metcalfe’s Law. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 30, 246–251 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: