Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Dynamic Adjusting Algorithm for Load Balancing and Handover Co-Optimization in LTE SON

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of mobile internet and multi-media service, advanced techniques need to be applied in wireless network to improve user experience. Long term evolution (LTE) systems, which can offer up to 100Mbps downlink date rates, have been deployed in USA and Korea. However, because plenty of complex physical layer algorithms are utilized, network planning and optimization become heavy burdens for LTE network operators. Self-organizing network (SON) is a promising method to overcome this problem by automatically selecting and adjusting key parameters in LTE systems. In this paper, we present a dynamic adjusting algorithm to improve both handover and load balancing performance by introducing a weighted co-satisfaction factor (CSF). Analysis and system level simulation are conducted to exhibit the performance improvement of the proposed scheme. Results show that the proposed method outperforms the conventional solutions in terms of the network handover success ratio and load balancing gains significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peng M, Wang W (2009) Technologies and standards for TD-SCDMA evolutions to IMT-advanced. IEEE Communications Magazine 47(12):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The third generation partnership project (3GPP). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) and evolved universal terrestrial radio access network (E-UTRAN), overall descriptions stage 2. TS 36.300, v9.2.0. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/36300.htm, Dec. 2012.

  3. Zhou Y, Wang J, Sawahashi M (2005) Downlink transmission of broadband OFCDM systems — Part I: Hybrid detection. IEEE Trans Commun 53(4):718–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Ng T, Wang J, Higuchi K, Sawahashi M (2008) OFCDM: A promising broadband wireless access technique. IEEE Communications Magazine 46(3):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tian L, Li J, Huang Y, Shi J, Zhou J (2012) Seamless dual-link handover scheme in broadband wireless communication systems for high-speed rail. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication 30(4):708–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The third generation partnership project (3GPP). Self-configuring and self-optimizing network (SON) use cases and solutions (release 9). TR 36.902, v9.1.0. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/36902.htm, Dec. 2012.

  7. The third generation partnership project (3GPP). Telecommunication management; Self-organizing networks (SON); Concepts and requirements (release 9). TS 32.500, v9.0.0, http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/32500.htm, Dec. 2012.

  8. Peng M, Liang D, Wei Y, Li J, Chen H. Self-configuration and self-optimization in LTE-advanced heterogeneous networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2013, 51(5), to be appeared.

  9. Wei Y, Peng M, Wang W, Min S, Jiang J, Huang Y. Automatic distributing schemes of physical cell identity for self-organizing networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2012, 2012.

  10. Hanly SV (1995) An algorithm for combined cell-site selection and power control to maximize cellular spread spectrum capacity. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication 13(7):1332–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das S, Viswanathan H, Rittenhouse G. Dynamic load balancing through coordinated scheduling in packet data systems. In Proc. the 22nd INFOCOM, Mar. 30-Apr. 3, 2003, pp.786–796.

  12. Zhang H, Qiu X S, Meng L M, Zhang X D. Achieving distributed load balancing in self-organizing LTE radio access network with autonomic network management. In Proc. the 25th GLOBECOM Workshop, December 2010, pp.454–459.

  13. Döttling M, Viering I. Challenges in mobile network operation: Towards self-optimizing networks. In Proc. ICASSP 2009, April 2009, pp.3609–3612.

  14. Bu T, Li L, Ramjee R. Generalized proportional fair scheduling in third generation wireless data networks. In Proc. the 25th INFOCOM, April 2006, pp.1–12.

  15. Kwan R, Arnott R, Paterson R, Trivisonno R, Kubota M. On mobility load balancing for LTE systems. In Proc. the 72nd VTC-Fall, September 2010.

  16. Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhang M R, Jia S C, Duan X Y. A two-layer mobility load balancing in LTE self-organization networks. In Proc. the 13th ICCT, September 2011, pp.925–929.

  17. Li Z H, Wang H, Pan Z W, Liu N, You X H. Joint optimization on load balancing and network load in 3GPP LTE multi-cell networks. In Proc. WCSP 2011, November 2011.

  18. Son K, Chong S, de Veciana G (2009) Dynamic association for load balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 8(7):3566–3576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Legg P, Hui G, Johansson J. A simulation study of LTE intra-frequency handover performance. In Proc. the 72nd VTC-Fall, September 2010.

  20. Jansen T, Balan I, Turk J, Moerman I, Kürner T. Handover parameter optimization in LTE self-organizing networks. In Proc. the 72nd VTC-Fall, September 2010.

  21. Komine T, Yamamoto T, Konishi S. A handover optimization algorithm with mobility robustness for LTE systems. In Proc. the 22nd PIMRC, September 2011, pp.1647–1651.

  22. The third generation partnership project (3GPP). Dependencies among SON use cases and CCO priority. R3-091032, http: // www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg ran/WG3 Iu/TSGR3 64/Docs/, Dec. 2012.

  23. Lobinger A, Stefanski S, Jansen T, Balan I. Coordinating handover parameter optimization and load balancing in LTE self-optimizing networks. In Proc. the 73rd VTC-Spring, May 2011.

  24. Jain R, Chiu D, Hawe W. A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems. Technical Report, DEC-TR-301, Digital Equipment Corp., 1984.

  25. The third generation partnership project (3GPP). Requirements for support of radio resource management. TS 36.133 V8.7.0, http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/36133.htm, Dec. 2012.

  26. Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26(6):369–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Das I, Dennis JE (1997) A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Structural Optimization 14(1):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jansen T, Balan I, Stefanski S, Moerman I, Kurner T. Weighted performance based handover parameter optimization in LTE. In Proc. the 73rd VTC-Spring, May 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Yu Li.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Basic Research (973) Program of China under Grant No. 2009CB320401, the State Major Science and Technology Special Projects of China under Grant No. 2011ZX03003-002-01, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61171100.

The preliminary version of the paper was published in the Proceedings of CHINACOM 2012.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 35.0 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, WY., Zhang, X., Jia, SC. et al. A Novel Dynamic Adjusting Algorithm for Load Balancing and Handover Co-Optimization in LTE SON. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 28, 437–444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-013-1345-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-013-1345-1

Keywords

Navigation