Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Network-Aware Interfaces as Facilitators of Innovation

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Achieving continuous innovation in organizations requires a balance between exploiting yet acquired knowledge and exploring new knowledge. In addition to having the adequate resources, change and innovation capabilities require specific management support and organizational structures. Recent research has pointed out the importance of social network structure and of the activity of agents that work across domains or disciplines in the innovation-oriented behaviour of organizations. As a consequence, information systems should ideally be able to support the analysis, development and management of such social structure for the benefit of organizational objectives. Current social network interfaces provide an established mental model to workers that can be hypothesized to be adequate for supporting activities that foster innovative behaviour. That behaviour is facilitated through exposing the activities of other workers across organizational structures. This paper reports on the design of a user interface specifically targeted to manage the social aspects of innovation based on some aspects of Hargadon’s model of innovation and knowledge brokering. The emergent nature of interactions in social network sites is used as the metaphor to foster situated cognition. The interface design assessment is described and some metrics for innovative behaviour that could be derived for such an interface are sketched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falkenberg E D, Hesse W, Lindgreen P et al. FRISCO — A framework of information system concepts — the FRISCO report. IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO, 1998.

  2. Hesse W, Verrijn-Stuart A A. Towards a theory of information systems: The FRISCO approach. In Proc. the 10th European-Japanese Conference on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, May 2000, pp.81–91.

  3. Cronk MC, Fitzgerald EP (1999) Understanding “IS business value”: Derivation of dimensions. Logistics Information Management 12(1/2):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Örtenblad A (2001) On differences between organizational learning and learning organization. The Learning Organization 8(3):125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiménez-Jiménez D, Sanz-Valle R (2011) Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research 64(4):408–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science 22(5):1123–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen JS, Boer H, Gertsen F (2008) The influence of learning in collaborative improvement. International Journal of Technology Management 42(1/2):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu Y (2011) Multi-criteria optimization with multiple responses for technological innovation. African Journal of Business Management 5(4):1493–1508

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burt R. The social capital of structural holes. In The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field, Guillén M F et al. (eds.), New York, USA: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002, pp.148–190.

  10. Lytras M, Ordóñez de Pablos P (2008) The role of a “make” or internal human resource management system in Spanish manufacturing companies: Empirical evidence. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 18(4):464–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hargadon AB (2002) Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behaviour 24:41–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Korfiatis N, Poulos M, Bokos G (2007) Social metadata for the impact factor. The Electronic Library 25(2):166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soosay C, Hyland P (2008) Exploration and exploitation: The interplay between knowledge and continuous innovation. International Journal of Technology Management 42(1/2):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frost J, Vogel R (2008) Linking exploration and exploitation: How a think tank triggers a managerial innovation. International Journal of Learning and Change 3(1):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chesbrough H, Prencipe A (2008) Networks of innovation and modularity: A dynamic perspective. International Journal of Technology Management 42(4):414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holman D, Axtell C, Clegg C et al (2000) Change and innovation in modern manufacturing practices: An expert panel survey of U.K. companies. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 10(2):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalafut PC, Low J (2001) The value creation index: Quantifying intangible value. Strategy & Leadership 29(5):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muller A, Välikangas L, Merlyn P (2005) Metrics for innovation: Guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. Strategy & Leadership 33(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

  20. Scott J P. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (2nd edition). Sage, 2000.

  21. Gallant L, Boone G, Heap, A. Five heuristics for designing and evaluating Web-based communities. First Monday, 2007, 12(3).

  22. Ellison N, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4):1143–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinfield C, Ellison N, Lampe C (2008) Social capital self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6):434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kester L, van Rosmalen P, Sloep P et al (2007) Matchmaking in learning networks: Bringing learners together for knowledge sharing. Interactive Learning Environments 15(2):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Staggers N, Norcio AF (1993) Mental models: Concepts for human-computer interaction research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(4):587–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holsapple CW, Joshi KD (2004) A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(7):593–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sicilia MA, Lytras M (2005) The semantic learning organization. The Learning Organization 12(5):402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalibatiene D, Vasilecas O (2010) Ontology axioms for the implementation of business rules. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(3):471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. He Y, He K, Wang C et al. MFI-3: An enabler for semantic interoperation between enterprise information resources. In Proc. the 2009 International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications China, April 2009, pp.47–52.

  30. Chang X, Terpenny J (2009) Ontology-based data integration and decision support for product e-Design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25(6):863–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Colomo-Palacios R, García-Crespo Á, Soto-Acosta P et al (2010) A case analysis of semantic technologies for R&D intermediation information management. International Journal of Information Management 30(5):465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valiente MC (2010) A systematic review of research on integration of ontologies with the model-driven approach. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 5(2):134–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Riedl C, May N, Finzen J et al (2009) An idea ontology for innovation management. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zanni-Merk C, Cavallucci D, Rousselot F (2009) An ontological basis for computer aided innovation. Computers in Industry 60(8):563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Adams WA (2008) A transdisciplinary ontology of innovation governance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16(2):147–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Raghallaigh P, Sammon D, Murphy C. Towards an ontology of innovation models—A conceptual framework. In Proc. the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011), June 2011.

  37. Sicilia MA, Lytras M, Rodríguez E et al (2006) Integrating descriptions of knowledge management learning activities into large ontological structures: A case study. Data and Knowledge Engineering 57(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rothwell W, Kazanas H. Mastering the Instructional Design Process. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass, 1992.

  39. Sicilia M. Ontology-based competency management: Infrastructures for the knowledge-intensive learning organization. In Intelligent Learning Infrastructures in Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web Perspective, Lytras M, Naeve A (eds.), Group Hershey, 2005, pp.302–324.

  40. Hargadon A. Brokers of innovation: Lessons from the past. Focus, 2004, 8(1).

  41. Carrington P, Scott J,Wasserman S (eds.). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2005.

  42. Sicilia M A, García E. Fuzzy group models for adaptation in cooperative information retrieval contexts. In Proc. the 30th Conf. Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, Jan. 2004, pp.324–334.

  43. Shardanand U, Maes P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth” In Proc. the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 1995, pp.210–217.

  44. Somerville M M, Howard Z. ‘Information in context’: Codesigning workplace structures and systems for organizational learning. Information Research, 2010, 15(4), Article No. 446.

  45. Mital M, Israel D, Agarwal S (2010) Information exchange and information disclosure in social networking web sites: Mediating role of trust. The Learning Organization 17(6):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McDonnell M, Shiri A (2011) Social search: A taxonomy of, and a user-centred approach to, social web search. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 45(1):6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selker T (2005) Fostering motivation and creativity for computer users. Int J Human-Computer Studies 63(4/5):410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sánchez-Alonso S, Frosch-Wilke D (2005) An ontological representation of learning objects and learning designs as codified knowledge. The Learning Organization 12(5):471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fairchild A M. Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In Proc. the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 2002, Vol.8: 243.

  50. Garmus D, Herron D. Function Point Analysis: Measurement Practices for Successful Software Projects. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2000.

  51. Freeman L (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lytras M, Sicilia M A, Tsotra D. On the sizing of knowledge management activities and its relationship to supporting technology. In Proc. the 2005 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice, June 2005, pp.483–490.

  53. Elsbach K, Barr P, Hargadon A (2005) Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science 16(4):422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransisco, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Cormican K, O’Sullivan D (2007) A groupware system for virtual product innovation management. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 17(6):499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Petty R, Guthrie J (2000) Intellectual capital literature review: Management, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(2):155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gruber T (2007) Ontology of folksonomy: A mash-up of apples and oranges. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Barcelona km. 33.600, Alcalá de Henares, 28871, Spain

    Elena García-Barriocanal, Miguel-Angel Sicilia & Salvador Sánchez-Alonso

Authors
  1. Elena García-Barriocanal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel-Angel Sicilia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salvador Sánchez-Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena García-Barriocanal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, MA. & Sánchez-Alonso, S. Social Network-Aware Interfaces as Facilitators of Innovation. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 27, 1211–1221 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-012-1297-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-012-1297-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation