Skip to main content
Log in

A Quadratic Lower Bound for Three-Query Linear Locally Decodable Codes over Any Field

  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A linear (q, δ, ϵ,m(n))-locally decodable code (LDC) C : \( {\mathbb F} \) n \( {\mathbb F} \) m(n) is a linear transformation from the vector space \( {\mathbb F} \) n to the space \( {\mathbb F} \) m(n) for which each message symbol x i can be recovered with probability at least \( \frac{1}{{\left| \mathbb{F} \right|}} + \varepsilon \) from C(x) by a randomized algorithm that queries only q positions of C(x), even if up to δm(n) positions of C(x) are corrupted. In a recent work of Dvir, the author shows that lower bounds for linear LDCs can imply lower bounds for arithmetic circuits. He suggests that proving lower bounds for LDCs over the complex or real field is a good starting point for approaching one of his conjectures. Our main result is an m(n) = Ω(n 2) lower bound for linear 3-query LDCs over any, possibly infinite, field. The constant in the Ω(·) depends only on ε and δ. This is the first lower bound better than the trivial m(n) = Ω(n) for arbitrary fields and more than two queries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sipser M, Spielman D A. Expander codes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 1996, 42(6): 1710–1722.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz J, Trevisan L. On the efficiency of local decoding procedures for error-correcting codes. In Proc. the 32d STOC, May 2000, pp.80–86.

  3. Goldreich O, Karloff H J, Schulman L J, Trevisan L. Lower bounds for linear locally decodable codes and private information retrieval. In Proc. the 17th CCC, May 2002, pp.175–183.

  4. Trevisan L. Some applications of coding theory in computational complexity. Quaderni di Matematica, 2004, 13: 347–424.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yekhanin S. Locally decodable codes and private information retrieval schemes [PhD thesis]. MIT, 2007.

  6. Candès E J, Romberg J K, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489–509.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289–1306.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Duarte M, Davenport M, Takhar D, Laska J, Sun T, Kelly K, Baraniuk R. Single-pixel imaging via compressing sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2008, 25(2): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dvir Z, Shpilka A. Locally decodable codes with 2 queries and polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. In Proc. the 37th Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC), May 2005, pp.592–601.

  10. Dvir Z. On matrix rigidity and locally self-correctable codes. In Proc. the 25th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), June 2010, pp.291–298.

  11. Valiant L G. Graph-theoretic arguments in low-level complexity. In Proc. the 6th MFCS, Sept. 1977, pp.162–176.

  12. Kerenidis I, de Wolf R. Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes. In Proc. the 35th STOC, June 2003, pp.106–115.

  13. Woodruff D P. New lower bounds for general locally decodable codes. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 2007, http://eccc.hpi-web.de/ecccreports/2007/TR07-006/index.html.

  14. Gál A, Mills A. Three-query locally decodable codes with higher correctness require exponential length. Transactions on Computation Theory, 2012, 2012, 3(2): Article No.5.

  15. Obata K. Optimal lower bounds for 2-query locally decodable linear codes. In Proc. the 6th APPROX-RANDOM, Sept. 2002, pp.39–50.

  16. Woodruff D P. Corruption and recovery-efficient locally decodable codes. In Proc. APPROX-RANDOM, Aug. 2008, pp.584–595.

  17. Efremenko K. 3-query locally decodable codes of subexponential length. In Proc. the 41st STOC, May 31-June 2, 2009, pp.39–44.

  18. Itoh T, Suzuki Y. New constructions for query-efficient locally decodable codes of subexponential length. Transaction on Information and Systems, 2010, E93-D(2): 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yekhanin S. Towards 3-query locally decodable codes of subexponential length. J. ACM, 2008, 55(1): 1–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Dvir Z, Gopalan P, Yekhanin S. Matching vector codes. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2010, http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2010/012/.

  21. Gopalan P. A note on Efremenko’s locally decodable codes. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2009, http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2009/069/.

  22. Diestel R. Graph theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics). Springer-Verlag, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Woodruff.

Additional information

A preliminary version of the paper appeared in APPROX-RANDOM 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodruff, D.P. A Quadratic Lower Bound for Three-Query Linear Locally Decodable Codes over Any Field. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 27, 678–686 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-012-1254-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-012-1254-8

Keywords

Navigation