Skip to main content
Log in

Endosonographische Interventionen im Gastrointestinaltrakt

Möglichkeiten und Grenzen

Endosonographic interventions in the gastrointestinal tract

Possibilities and limitations

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Endosonographische Interventionen eröffnen vielseitige neue Therapieoptionen und werden zunehmend als Alternativen zu chirurgischen Verfahren eingesetzt. Hierbei stellt sich die Frage nach den technischen und klinischen Möglichkeiten sowie deren Grenzen. Im Folgenden wird ein Überblick zu Einsatzgebieten endosonographischer Interventionen geboten. Fallbeispiele aus der Klinik der Autoren zeigen den praktischen Einsatz.

Abstract

Endosonography-guided interventions are new therapeutic options and offer a good alternative to surgical interventions. Therefore, it is important to identify technical and clinical possibilities and limitations. The following article gives a review on the indications and management of endosonographic interventions with clinical case examples from the authors’ hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Banks PA et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beyer G, Hoffmeister A et al (2021) S3-Leitlinie Pankreatitis der DGVS

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bronswijk M et al (2021) Laparoscopic versus EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: an international multicenter propensity score-matched comparison (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 94(3):526–536.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YI (2018) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: a muliticenter study comparing the direct and balloon-assisted techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1215–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhindsa BS et al (2020) EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9(2):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dollhopf M, Larghi A, Will U, Rimbaş M, Anderloni A, Sanchez-Yague A, Teoh AYB, Kunda R (2017) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis and high surgical risk using an electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent device. Gastrointest Endosc 86(4):636–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Domagk D et al (2018) Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy 50(11):1116–1127. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0749-8767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ge PS et al (2017) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 5:E275–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulati R et al (2018) Endoscopic removal a replacement of the same lumen-apposing metal stent for multiple endoscopic necrosectomy sessions. Endoscopy 50:E233–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Itoi T et al (2017) Technical review of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy in 2017. Dig Endosc 29:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khashab MA et al (2017) International multicenter comparative trial of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatement of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 5:E275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunda R et al (2016) EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction using a lumen-apposing fully covered metal stent after failed ERCP. Surg Endosc 30(11):5002–5008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4845-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh D et al (2019) EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Gastrointest Endosc 89(2):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik WH et al (2018) EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 113(7):987–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paik WH, Park DH (2019) Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 8(1):S44–S49

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rimbaş M et al (2017) EUS-guided biliary drainage: is it ready for prime time? Endosc Ultrasound 6(3):S122–S12

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharaiha RZ et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):904–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahm M et al (2020) Morbidität und Letalität der Single-Incision-Cholezystektomie: eine 3‑Jahres-Registeranalyse. Zentralbl Chir 145(04):390–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Siddiqui AA et al (2016) EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective multicenter U.S. experience. Gastrointest Endosc 83:699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siddiqui A et al (2019) Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 33(4):1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6406-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter D et al (2015) A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy 47:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Franziska Franck, Marie-Christine Becker or Markus Dollhopf.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Dollhopf erhielt Vortrags- und Beratertätigkeitshonorare durch Boston Scientific. F. Franck und M.-C. Becker geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

Arthur Schmidt, Freiburg

Michael Fried, Zürich

Ralf Jakobs, Ludwigshafen

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franck, F., Becker, MC. & Dollhopf, M. Endosonographische Interventionen im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Gastroenterologe 17, 93–102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-022-00596-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-022-00596-w

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation