Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoskopische Technik

Aktuelle Standards und neue Entwicklungen

Endoscopic techniques

Current standards and future developments

  • Neue Techniken
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Neue Endoskopietechniken verbessern die Detektionsrate insbesondere flacher und kleiner Läsionen. Hochauflösende Endoskope lassen feinste mukosale Details erkennen, insbesondere in Verbindung mit digitaler Kontrastverstärkung. Mit der virtuellen Chromoendoskopie können Läsionen charakterisiert und ihre Ausdehnung genau definiert werden. Die Autofluoreszenzbildgebung hat das Potenzial, als Rote-Flaggen-Technologie die Anzahl übersehener Läsionen zu verringern. Mit der Endomikroskopie kann erstmals während der laufenden Untersuchung eine Mikroskopie von Läsionen vorgenommen werden.

Abstract

Technical innovations in endoscopy enhance the detection predominantly of flat and minute lesions. High-definition endoscopes allow visualization of fine mucosal details, especially in conjunction with digital contrast enhancement. Virtual chromoendoscopy permits characterization of lesions and exact definition of their borders. Autofluorescence imaging has the potential to serve as a red flag technique to reduce the lesion miss rate. Endomicroscopy offers microscopy of lesions during ongoing endoscopy for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Hoffmeister M (2010) Eight years of colonoscopic bowel cancer screening in Germany: initial findings and projections. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107:753–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rex DK, Helbig CC (2007) High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 133:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dekker E, East JE (2010) Does advanced endoscopic imaging increase the efficacy of surveillance colonoscopy? Endoscopy 42:866–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al (2008) A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:768–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al (2010) High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman A, Sar F, Goetz M et al (2010) High definition colonoscopy combined with i-Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 42:827–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T et al (1996) Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M et al (2003) Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 124:880–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurlstone DP, McAlindon ME, Sanders DS et al (2004) Further validation of high-magnification chromoscopic-colonoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 126:376–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Schofield G et al (2004) Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gut 53:256–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ et al (2005) Indigo carmine-assisted high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterisation of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: a prospective evaluation. Endoscopy 37:1186–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al (2007) Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132:874–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marion JF, Waye JD, Present DH et al (2008) Chromoendoscopy-targeted biopsies are superior to standard colonoscopic surveillance for detecting dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective endoscopic trial. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2342–2349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itzkowitz SH, Present DH (2005) Consensus conference: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Biancone L, Michetti P, Travis S et al (2008) European evidence-based consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 2:63–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pohl J, Schneider A, Vogell H et al (2011) Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 60:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. East JE, Suzuki N, Stavrinidis M et al (2008) Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 57:65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al (2009) Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 136:410–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al (2008) A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 57:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman A, Kagel C, Goetz M et al (2010) Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-Scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 42:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dekker E, Broek FJ van den, Reitsma JB et al (2007) Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 39:216–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Broek FJ van den, Fockens P, Eeden S van et al (2011) Narrow-band imaging versus high-definition endoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 43:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Broek FJ van den, Soest EJ van, Naber AH et al (2009) Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1498–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al (2004) Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 127:706–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Broek FJ van den, Es JA van, Eeden S van et al (2011) Pilot study of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during colonoscopic surveillance of patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 43:116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M et al (2006) In vivo histology of Barrett’s esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:979–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunbar KB, Canto MI (2010) Confocal laser endomicroscopy in Barrett’s esophagus and endoscopically inapparent Barrett’s neoplasia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 72:668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pohl H, Rosch T, Vieth M et al (2008) Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57:1648–1653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo YT, Li YQ, Yu T et al (2008) Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia with confocal laser endomicroscopy in vivo: a prospective study. Endoscopy 40:547–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kiesslich R, Hoffman A, Goetz M et al (2006) In vivo diagnosis of collagenous colitis by confocal endomicroscopy. Gut 55:591–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Angus EM et al (2007) Identification of epithelial gaps in human small and large intestine by confocal endomicroscopy. Gastroenterology 133:1769–1778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moussata D, Goetz M, Gloeckner A et al (2011) Confocal laser endomicroscopy is a new imaging modality for recognition of intramucosal bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease in vivo. Gut 60:26–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mahmood U (2010) Optical molecular imaging approaches in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138:419–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Goetz M, Wang TD (2010) Molecular imaging in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterology 138:828–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hsiung PL, Hardy J, Friedland S et al (2008) Detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo using a targeted heptapeptide and confocal microendoscopy. Nat Med 14:454–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goetz M, Ziebart A, Foersch S et al (2010) In vivo molecular imaging of colorectal cancer with confocal endomicroscopy by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor. Gastroenterology 138:435–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Foersch S, Kiesslich R, Waldner MJ et al (2010) Molecular imaging of VEGF in gastrointestinal cancer in vivo using confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gut 59:1046–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin:

Der Autor hat Vortragshonorare von Pentax, Europe, erhalten.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland

    M. Goetz

Authors
  1. M. Goetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Goetz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goetz, M. Endoskopische Technik. Gastroenterologe 6, 333–336 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-011-0569-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-011-0569-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation