Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a whole-body walking rehabilitation robot and power assistive method using EMG signals

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the development of DDGo Advanced, a whole-body walking rehabilitation robot designed as an end-effector type, along with its three walking training methods. Most of the walking rehabilitation robots currently on the market have been developed only to rehabilitate the lower limbs of patients. However, actual human walking performs a whole-body movement with an arm swing. To this point, DDGo Advanced has been developed to provide a natural and correct walking motion of a healthy person by using both a lower-limb rehabilitation part for walking motion and an upper-limb rehabilitation part for the arm swing motion. Using DDGo Advanced, three walking training modes using a parallel hybrid driving unit are proposed. The first is Passive mode in which the robot fully supports the user walking motion. The second is electromyography (EMG)-based Active-assist mode, which checks the muscle signals of the user’s healthy leg and determines the user’s walking intention. It then automatically performs acceleration and deceleration of the driving motor. The third is Active mode with specific angles assist which allows the user to perform walking rehabilitation training with mostly the power of the user and only minimal assistance from the robot. In addition, we adopted a device capable of automatically changing the step length according to the walking speed. Finally, we verified with experiments that the walking motion of the user who performed whole-body walking rehabilitation was more similar to the walking of a healthy person than the walking motion of the user who performed only the lower-limb walking rehabilitation. Moreover, the muscle-assistance performance of each of the three modes was verified by experiments using EMG measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data in this paper are available.

References

  1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW (2009) Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374(9696):1196–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaul E, Barron J (2017) Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health 5:335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han NY, Ko EA, Hwang SY (2009) Knowledge of stroke symptoms and risk factors among older adults. Korean J Adult Nurs 21(3):314–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teasell RW, McRae MP, Finestone HM (2000) Social issues in the rehabilitation of younger stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(2):205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90142-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Critchlow AJ (1985) Introduction to robotics. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5502022

  6. Garcia E, Jimenez MA, De Santos PG, Armada M (2007) The evolution of robotics research. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):90–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2007.339608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTRL, Diels C, Aisen M (2000) A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54(10):1938–1944. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.10.1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gassert R, Dietz V (2018) Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil 15(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber LM, Stein J (2018) The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: A narrative review. NeuroRehabilitation 43(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulas M, Folgheraiter M, Gini G (2005) An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. In: 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. IEEE, pp 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501122

  11. Cesqui B, Tropea P, Micera S, Krebs HI (2013) EMG-based pattern recognition approach in post stroke robot-aided rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-75r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Basmajian JV, Gowland C, Brandstater ME, Swanson L, Trotter J (1982) EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63(12):613–616

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi CD, Lahiri U, Thakor NV (2013) Classification of gait phases from lower limb EMG: application to exoskeleton orthosis. In: 2013 IEEE point-of-care healthcare technologies (PHT). IEEE, pp 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHT.2013.6461326

  14. Pittaccio S, Viscuso S (2011) An EMG-controlled SMA device for the rehabilitation of the ankle joint in post-acute stroke. J Mater Eng Perform 20(4):666–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9826-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aguirre-Ollinger G, Colgate JE, Peshkin MA, Goswami A (2007) Active-impedance control of a lower-limb assistive exoskeleton. In: 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics. IEEE, pp 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428426

  16. Kim J-J, Kim M-J, Kim C-H, Kim J-Y (2017) Optimal design of a five-link mechanism for an end-effector typed walking rehabilitation robot. In: 17th international conference on control, automation and systems (ICCAS 2017), pp 73–75

  17. Kim JY, Kim JY, Kim HS, Park KW (2020) Development and evaluation of a hybrid walking rehabilitation robot, DDgo Pro. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 21(11):2105–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00404-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Research Program funded by the SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology).

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Program funded by the SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J-HW mainly did “Hardware Development”, and J-YK mainly did “Power Assistive Method”.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Yup Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There are no competing interests for this paper.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We approve Ethics and participation of this paper.

Consent for publication

We consent to publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, JH., Kim, JY. Development of a whole-body walking rehabilitation robot and power assistive method using EMG signals. Intel Serv Robotics 16, 139–153 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-023-00459-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-023-00459-5

Keywords

Navigation