Abstract
Purpose
To understand the effects of poplar–intercropping systems on soil nutrients and soil enzyme activities, and further analyzed the relationship between soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients.
Methods
Three different planting systems were chosen: a monoculture wheat (Triticum aestivum) system (W), a narrowly spaced poplar (Populus deltoides)–wheat intercropping system (PWN), and a widely spaced poplar–wheat intercropping system (PWW). The chemical properties (soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available potassium (AK)) and four enzymatic activities (urease, catalase, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase) in four soil layers (0–20, 20–40, 40–60 and 60–100 cm) of two sampling sites (1.5 and 3.5 m from tree row) in the three planting systems were investigated.
Results
The SOM, TN, TP, TK, AP, AK concentrations and four soil enzyme activities were higher in the intercropping systems than in the monoculture wheat system, especially the PWN system. In the vertical direction, the soil nutrient concentrations and soil enzyme activities decreased with soil depth (P < 0.001), except AK and catalase. In the horizontal direction, the SOM, TN, TP, TK concentrations and four soil enzyme activities decreased with greater of distance from the poplar row, but the distribution trend was the opposite for AN, AP and AK. The correlation analysis revealed that the soil enzyme activities were significantly correlated with the SOM, TN, TP, AN and AP concentrations in the three planting systems (P < 0.01).
Conclusion
In conclusion, agroforestry systems can significantly increase soil nutrient status and soil enzyme activities and can be an efficient method for improving soil health conditions. Additionally, compared with the wide poplar spacing in the intercropping system, the reasonably dense planting of intercropped poplar had more obvious effects on improving soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Adetunji AT, Lewu FB, Mulidzi R, Ncube B (2017) The biological activities of beta-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17(3):794–807. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162017000300018
Alkorta I, Aizpurua A, Riga P, Albizu I, Amezaga I, Garbisu C (2003) Soil enzyme activities as biological indicators of soil health. Rev Environ Health 18(1):65–73
Andrianarisoa KS, Dufour L, Bienaime S, Zeller B, Dupraz C (2016) The introduction of hybrid walnut trees (Juglans nigra × regia cv. NG23) into cropland reduces soil mineral N content in autumn in southern France. Agrofor Syst 90(2):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9845-3
Bahamonde HA, Peri PL, Pastur GM, Monelos L (2015) Litterfall and nutrients return in Nothofagus antarctica forests growing in a site quality gradient with different management uses in Southern Patagonia. Eur J Res 134(1):113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0837-z
Bai YC, Li BX, Xu CY, Raza M, Wang Q, Wang QZ, Fu YN, Hu JY, Imoulan A, Hussain M, Xu YJ (2022) Intercropping walnut and tea: effects on soil nutrients, enzyme activity, and microbial communities. Front Microbiol 13:852342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.852342
Bai YF, Ma LN, Degen AA, Rafiq MK, Kuzyakov Y, Zhao JX, Zhang R, Zhang T, Wang WY, Li XG, Long RJ, Shang ZH (2020) Long-term active restoration of extremely degraded alpine grassland accelerated turnover and increased stability of soil carbon. Glob Change Biol 26(12):7217–7228. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15361
Bending GD, Turner MK, Jones JE (2002) Interactions between crop residue and soil organic matter quality and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 34(8):1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00040-8
Beule L, Lehtsaar E, Corre MD, Schmidt M, Veldkamp E, Karlovsky P (2020) Poplar rows in temperate agroforestry croplands promote bacteria, fungi, and denitrification genes in soils. Front Microbiol 10:3108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03108
Brooker RW, Bennett AE, Cong WF, Daniell TJ, George TS, Hallett PD, Hawes C, Iannetta PPM, Jones HG, Karley AJ, Li L, McKenzie BM, Pakeman RJ, Paterson E, Schob C, Shen JB, Squire G, Watson CA, Zhang CC, Zhang FS, Zhang JL, White PJ (2015) Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytol 206:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13132
Cenini VL, Fornara DA, McMullan G, Ternan N, Carolan R, Crawley MJ, Clement JC, Lavorel S (2016) Linkages between extracellular enzyme activities and the carbon and nitrogen content of grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 96:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.015
Chen CF, Liu WJ, Jiang XJ, Wu JE (2017) Effects of rubber-based agroforestry systems on soil aggregation and associated soil organic carbon: Implications for land use. Geoderma 299:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.03.021
Chen H, Li DJ, Zhao J, Xiao KC, Wang KL (2018) Effects of nitrogen addition on activities of soil nitrogen acquisition enzymes: A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 252:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.032
Chen XX, Song BZ, Yao YC, Wu HY, Hu JH, Zhao LL (2014) Aromatic plants play an important role in promoting soil biological activity related to nitrogen cycling in an orchard ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 472:939–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.117
Cong WF, Hoffland E, Li L, Six J, Sun JH, Bao XG, Zhang FS, van der Werf W (2015) Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Glob Change Biol 21:1715–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12738
Cui YX, Fang LC, Guo XB, Wang X, Wang YQ, Zhang YJ, Zhang XC (2019) Responses of soil bacterial communities, enzyme activities, and nutrients to agricultural-to-natural ecosystem conversion in the Loess Plateau. China J Soils Sediments 19(3):1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2110-4
de Santiago A, Recena R, Perea-Torres F, Moreno MT, Carmona E, Delgado A (2019) Relationship of soil fertility to biochemical properties under agricultural practices aimed at controlling land degradation. Land Degrad Dev 30(9):1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3298
Dou FG, Wright AL, Mylavarapu RS, Jiang XJ, Matocha JE (2016) Soil enzyme activities and organic matter composition affected by 26 years of continuous cropping. Pedosphere 26(5):618–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(15)60070-4
Duran J, Morse JL, Rodriguez A, Campbell JL, Christenson LM, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ, Fisk MC, Mitchell MJ, Temple PH, Groffman PM (2017) Differential sensitivity to climate change of C and N cycling processes across soil horizons in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 107:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.028
Fall D, Diouf D, Zoubeirou AM, Bakhoum N, Faye A, Sall SN (2012) Effect of distance and depth on microbial biomass and mineral nitrogen content under Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. trees. J Environ Manage 95:S260–S264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.038
Farooq TH, Kumar U, Mo J, Shakoor A, Wang J, Rashid MHU, Tufail MA, Chen XY, Yan WD (2021) Intercropping of peanut-tea enhances soil enzymatic activity and soil nutrient status at different soil profiles in subtropical southern China. Plants-Basel 10(5):881. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050881
Gelman F, Binstock R, Halicz L (2012) Application of the Walkley-Black titration for the organic carbon quantification in organic rich sedimentary rocks. Fuel 96(1):608–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.053
Ge XG, Xiao WF, Zeng LX, Huang ZL, Zhou BZ, Schaub M, Li MH (2017) Relationships between soil-litter interface enzyme activities and decomposition in Pinus massoniana plantations in China. J Soils Sediments 17(4):996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1591-2
Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA, Sykas D (2016) Effect of trees on the reduction of nutrient concentrations in the soils of cultivated areas. Environ Monit Assess 188(6):327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5325-0
Gomez-Sagasti MT, Garbisu C, Urra J, Miguez F, Artetxe U, Hernandez A, Vilela J, Alkorta I, Becerril JM (2021) Mycorrhizal–assisted phytoremediation and intercropping strategies improved the health of contaminated soil in a Peri Urban area. Front Plant Sci 12:693044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.693044
Gong XW, Liu CJ, Li J, Luo Y, Yang QH, Zhang WL, Yang P, Feng BL (2019) Responses of rhizosphere soil properties, enzyme activities and microbial diversity to intercropping patterns on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Tillage Res 195:104355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104355
Grunewald H, Bohm C, Quinkenstein A, Grundmann P, Eberts J, von Wuhlisch G (2009) Robinia pseudoacacia L.: A lesser known tree species for biomass production. Bioenergy Res 2(3):123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9038-x
Hou GL, Delang CO, Lu XX, Olschewski R (2019) Valuing carbon sequestration to finance afforestation projects in China. Forests 10(9):754. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090754
Hu S, Zhu L, Wang ZL (2022) Turfgrass intercropping prevents non-point source pollution in sweet pepper production. Chemosphere 288:132470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132470
Hu WG, Jiao ZF, Wu FS, Liu YJ, Dong MX, Ma XJ, Fan TL, An LZ, Feng HY (2014) Long-term effects of fertilizer on soil enzymatic activity of wheat field soil in Loess Plateau. China Ecotoxicology 23(10):2069–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1329-0
Hu YL, Wang SL, Zeng DH (2006) Effects of single Chinese fir and mixed leaf litters on soil chemical, microbial properties and soil enzyme activities. Plant Soil 282(1–2):379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0004-5
Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Huang WZ (2002) Enzyme activities during litter decomposition of two exotic and two native plant species in hardwood forests of New Jersey. Soil Biol Biochem 34(9):1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00057-3
Kuscu ISK (2019) Changing of soil properties and urease-catalase enzyme activity depending on plant type and shading. Environ Monit Assess 191(3):178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7304-8
Li J, Zhou LJ, Lin WF (2019) Calla lily intercropping in rubber tree plantations changes the nutrient content, microbial abundance, and enzyme activity of both rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil and calla lily growth. Ind Crops Prod 132:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.045
Liu CJ, Gong XW (2022) Changes in rhizosphere soil nitrogen fractions associated with enzyme activities are linked to the microbial community following intercropping combined with nitrogen fertilization. Land Degrad Dev 33(7):1101–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4239
Loeppmann S, Semenov M, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Substrate quality affects microbial- and enzyme activities in rooted soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400518
Maphuhla NG, Lewu FB, Oyedeji OO (2021) The effects of physicochemical parameters on analysed soil enzyme activity from Alice Landfill site. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(1):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010221
Ma XM, Liu Y, Zarebanadkouki M, Razavi BS, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2018) Spatiotemporal patterns of enzyme activities in the rhizosphere: effects of plant growth and root morphology. Biol Fertil Soils 54(7):819–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1305-6
Ma YH, Fu SL, Zhang XP, Zhao K, Chen HYH (2017) Intercropping improves soil nutrient availability, soil enzyme activity and tea quantity and quality. Appl Soil Ecol 119:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.028
Moreira RS, Chiba MK, Nunes SB, de Maria IC (2017) Air-drying pretreatment effect on soil enzymatic activity. Plant Soil Environ 63(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.17221/656/2016-pse
Mori T (2022) Greater impacts of phosphorus fertilization on soil phosphatase activity in tropical forests than in non-tropical natural terrestrial ecosystems: A meta-analysis. Pedobiologia 91:150808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2022.150808
Moscatelli MC, Lagomarsino A, Garzillo AMV, Pignataro A, Grego S (2012) Beta-Glucosidase kinetic parameters as indicators of soil quality under conventional and organic cropping systems applying two analytical approaches. Ecol Indic 13(1):322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.031
Nannipieri P, Trasar-Cepeda C, Dick RP (2018) Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis. Biol Fertil Soils 54(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1245-6
Nowak J, Kaklewski K, Ligocki M (2004) Influence of selenium on oxidoreductive enzymes activity in soil and in plants. Soil Biol Biochem 36(10):1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.002
Pan JW, Guo QQ, Li HE, Luo SQ, Zhang YQ, Yao S, Fan X, Sun XG, Qi YJ (2021) Dynamics of Soil Nutrients, Microbial Community Structure, Enzymatic Activity, and Their Relationships along a Chronosequence of Pinus massoniana Plantations. Forests 12(3):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030376
Perucci P, Bonciarelli U, Santilocchi R, Bianchi AA (1997) Effect of rotation, nitrogen fertilization and management of crop residues on some chemical, microbiological and biochemical properties of soil. Biol Fertil Soils 24:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050249
Piscitelli L, Mezzapesa GN, Mondelli D, Miano T (2020) Mediterranean soil fertility management for economically feasible and environmentally sustainable production of organic tomatoes. Agrochimica 64(2):107–120. https://doi.org/10.12871/00021857202022
Razavi BS, Zarebanadkouki M, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Rhizosphere shape of lentil and maize: Spatial distribution of enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 96:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.020
Rivest D, Cogliastro A, Bradley RL, Olivier A (2010) Intercropping hybrid poplar with soybean increases soil microbial biomass, mineral N supply and tree growth. Agrofor Syst 80(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9342-7
Ros GH (2012) Predicting soil N mineralization using organic matter fractions and soil properties: A re-analysis of literature data. Soil Biol Biochem 45:132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.10.015
Schoebitz M, Castillo D, Jorquera M, Roldan A (2020) Responses of microbiological soil properties to intercropping at different planting densities in an acidic andisol. Agronomy-Basel 10(6):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060781
Semenov VM, Lebedeva TN, Zinyakova NB, Khromychkina DP, Sokolov DA, de Gerenyu VOL, Kravchenko IK, Li H, Semenov MV (2022) Dependence of soil organic matter and plant residues decomposition on temperature and moisture in the long-term incubation experiments. Eurasian Soil Sci 55(7):926–939. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229322070080
Shi ZJ, Lu Y, Xu ZG, Fu SL (2008) Enzyme activities of urban soils under different land use in the Shenzhen city, China. Plant Soil Environ 54(8):341–346. https://doi.org/10.17221/415-pse
Solanki MK, Wang FY, Li CN, Wang Z, Lan TJ, Singh RK, Singh P, Yang LT, Li YR (2020) Impact of sugarcane-legume intercropping on diazotrophic microbiome. Sugar Tech 22(1):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00755-4
Song HY, Chen D, Sun SX, Li J, Tu MY, Xu ZH, Gong RG, Jiang GL (2021) Peach-Morchella intercropping mode affects soil properties and fungal composition. Peerj 9:e11705. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11705
Tan XP, Nie YX, Ma XM, Guo ZM, Liu Y, Tian HX, Megharaj M, He WX (2021) Soil chemical properties rather than the abundance of active and potentially active microorganisms control soil enzyme kinetics. Sci Total Environ 770:144500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144500
Tian YL, Cao FL, Wang GB (2013) Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in ginkgo-tea agroforestry compared with monoculture. Agrofor Syst 87(5):1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9630-0
Vachon K, Oelbermann M (2011) Crop residue input and decomposition in a temperate maize-soybean intercrop system. Soil Sci 176(4):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182104213
Wang B, Zhu L, Yang T, Qian ZZ, Xu C, Tian D, Tang LZ (2022a) Poplar agroforestry systems in eastern China enhance the spatiotemporal stability of soil microbial community structure and metabolism. Land Degrad Dev 33(6):916–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4199
Wang C, Lu XK, Mori T, Mao QG, Zhou KJ, Zhou GY, Nie YX, Mo JM (2018a) Responses of soil microbial community to continuous experimental nitrogen additions for 13 years in a nitrogen-rich tropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem 121:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.009
Wang CQ, Xue L, Dong YH, Jiao RZ (2021) Effects of stand density on soil microbial community composition and enzyme activities in subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolate (Lamb.) Hook plantations. For Ecol Manage 479:118559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118559
Wang GB, Cao FL (2011) Integrated evaluation of soil fertility in Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China. Agrofor Syst 83(1):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9399-y
Wang YF, Qin YZ, Chai Q, Feng FX, Zhao C, Yu AZ (2018b) Interspecies interactions in relation to root distribution across the rooting profile in wheat–maize intercropping under different plant densities. Front Plant Sci 9:483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00483
Wang ZC, Zhou MY, Liu H, Huang C, Ma YH, Ge HX, Ge X, Fu SL (2022a) Pecan agroforestry systems improve soil quality by stimulating enzyme activity. Peerj 9:e12663. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12663.
Wesolowska S, Futa B, Myszura M, Kobylka A (2022) Residual Effects of Different Cropping Systems on Physicochemical Properties and the Activity of Phosphatases of Soil. Agriculture-Basel 12(5):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050693
Xiao X M, Cheng ZH, Lv J, Xie JM, Ma N, Yu JH (2019) A green garlic (Allium sativum L.) based intercropping system reduces the strain of continuous monocropping in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by adjusting the micro-ecological environment of soil. Peerj 7:e7276. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7267
Xiao YS, Peng FT, Dang ZQ, Jiang XM, Zhang JH, Zhang YF, Shu HR (2015) Influence of rhizosphere ventilation on soil nutrient status, root architecture and the growth of young peach trees. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61(5):775–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2015.1045404
Xie J, Wu Z, Zhang XY, Peng T, Yang CM, Zhang JJ, Liang J (2021) Diversity and structural characteristics of soil microbial communities in different habitats of wild Lilium regale Wilson in Wenchuan area. Bioengineered 12(2):10457–10469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1997366
Yang L, Muhammad I, Chi YX, Wang D, Zhou XB (2022) Straw return and nitrogen fertilization to maize regulate soil properties, microbial community, and enzyme activities under a dual cropping system. Front Microbiol 13:823963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.823963
Yu PJ, Tang XG, Zhang AC, Fan GH, Liu SW (2019) Responses of soil specific enzyme activities to short-term land use conversions in a salt-affected region, northeastern China. Sci Total Environ 687:939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.171
Zhang XQ, Huang GQ, Bian XM, Zhao QG (2013) Effects of nitrogen fertilization and root interaction on the agronomic traits of intercropped maize, and the quantity of microorganisms and activity of enzymes in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 368(1–2):407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1528-5
Zhang YL, Cui D, Yang HJ, Kasim N (2020) Differences of soil enzyme activities and its influencing factors under different flooding conditions in Ili Valley, Xinjiang. Peerj 8:e8531. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8531
Zhao S, Chen X, Deng SP, Dong XN, Song AP, Yao JJ, Fang WM, Chen FD (2016) The effects of fungicide, soil fumigant, bio-organic fertilizer and their combined application on chrysanthemum fusarium wilt controlling, soil enzyme activities and microbial properties. Molecules 21(4):526. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040526
Zhao XH, Dong QQ, Han Y, Zhang KZ, Shi XL, Yang X, Yuan Y, Zhou D, Wang K, Wang XG, Jiang CJ, Liu XB, Zhang H, Zhang ZM, Yu HQ (2022) Maize/peanut intercropping improves nutrient uptake of side-row maize and system microbial community diversity. BMC Microbiol 22(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02425-6
Zheng BC, Zhang XN, Chen P, Du Q, Zhou Y, Yang H, Wang XC, Yang F, Yong TW, Yang WY (2021) Improving maize's N uptake and N use efficiency by strengthening roots' absorption capacity when intercropped with legumes. Peerj 9:e11658. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11658
Zhu LZ, He J, Tian Y, Li XY, Li YH, Wang F, Qin K, Wang J (2022) Intercropping wolfberry with Gramineae plants improves productivity and soil quality. Sci Hortic 292:110636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110632
Funding
This work was funded by The National Key Research and Development Program of China [grant number 2021YFD2201202].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Cheng Xu: Methodology, Investigation and Writing-original draft. Bo Wang, Tao Yang, Zeyang Lin and Di Tian: Investigation and Visualization. Zhuangzhuang Qian and Changjun Ding: Data curation and Reviewing. Luozhong Tang: Methodology, Reviewing and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Jianming Xue
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, C., Qian, Z., Wang, B. et al. Effects of poplar agroforestry systems on soil nutrient and enzyme activity in the coastal region of eastern China. J Soils Sediments 23, 3108–3123 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03553-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03553-4