Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the difference of biochar and aged biochar to improve soil fertility and cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) productivity

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Biochar plays an active role in increasing crop yield and improving soil quality due to its unique properties and structure. However, the physical and chemical properties of biochar also change over time after applying to the soil, which is referred to as aging. The distinction between modifying soil fertility and soil nutrient status is uncertain (especially in soil potassium levels).

Materials and methods

We used three approaches to simulate aging progress of biochar, including acidification (AB), dry–wet cycle (DWB), and freezing–thawing cycling (FB). We used element analyzer, BET-N adsorption method, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to observe the difference in physical and chemical properties between original biochar (OB) and aged biochar (AB, DWB, and FB). In addition, we undertook pot experiment to assess the impact of original biochar and aged biochar on soil fertility status, soil enzyme activities, and the growth of cabbage, especially in the difference in promoting soil potassium (K) level.

Results and discussion

The main results were as follows: Original biochar and aged biochar improved soil fertility and cabbage growth, but the improvement effect of aged biochar on soil environment was weakened. Among all-aged biochars, the AB had the worst effect on the soil environment. Compared to without biochar treatment (CK), the water-soluble K, available K, exchangeable K, and non-exchangeable K were increased by 43.60%, 45.56%, 46.49%, and 44.30%, respectively, under original biochar treatment. However, the promotion effect of soil potassium level was significantly decreased under the AB treatment. Additionally, the C and N content of biochar increased with aged biochar treatment, and the increasing trend was further obvious after applying it to the soil. Moreover, aged biochar treatment affected the surface of biochar, and was more susceptible to erosion in the soil by long-term water leaching.

Conclusions

Overall, the impacts of aged biochar on cabbage growth and soil fertility were inhibited compared to original biochar treatment, further providing a basis and reference for the proper application of biochar in agriculture production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The availability of data and materials is on the base of personal request.

References

  • Ahmad M, Hashimoto Y, Moon DH, Lee SS, Ok YS (2012) Immobilization of lead in a Korean military shooting range soil using eggshell waste: an integrated mechanistic approach. J Hazard Mater 209–210:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.047

  • Akhtar SS. Li G, Andersen MN, Liu F (2014) Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agric Water Manag 138: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.016

  • Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M, Usman ARA (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.165

  • Anton-Herrero R, Garciadelgado C, Alonsoizquierdo M, Garciarodriguez G, Cuevas J, Eymar E (2018) Comparative adsorption of tetracyclines on biochars and stevensite: looking for the most effective adsorbent. Appl Clay Sci 160:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.12.023

  • Bao SD (2000) Soil and agriculture chemistry analysis, third ed. China Agr. Press 39–61 (in Chinese)

  • Braadbaart F, Poole I (2009) Preservation potential of charcoal in alkaline environments: an experimental approach and implications for the archaeological record. J Archaeol Sci 36:1672–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.03.006

  • Chen H, Li D, Zhao J, Zhang W, Xiao K, Wang K (2018) Nitrogen addition aggravates microbial carbon limitation: evidence from ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. Geoderma 329:61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.019

  • Chen WF, Meng J, Han XR, Zhang W (2019) Past, present, and future of biochar. Biochar 1:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00008-3

  • Cornelissen G (2005) Extensive sorption of organic compounds to black carbon, coal, and kerogen in sediments and soils: mechanisms and consequences for distribution, bioaccumulation, and biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 39:6881–6895. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050191b

  • Cui DJ, Liu YH, Zheng QZ, Xin W, Li SH, Sui FG (2008) Effect of long-term fertilization on K+ releasing of different soil particle fractions in noncalcareous fluvo-aquic. Acta Pedologic Sinica 45(3):573–578 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2000) Mechanisms of liquefaction and pyrolysis reactions of biomass. Energy Convers Manage 41:633–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00130-2

  • Demisie W, Liu Z, Zhang M (2014) Effect of biochar on carbon fractions and enzyme activity of red soil. Catena 121:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.020

  • Dong C, Wang W, Liu H, Xu X, Zeng H (2019) Temperate grassland shifted from nitrogen to phosphorus limitation induced by degradation and nitrogen deposition : evidence from soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry. Ecol Indic 101:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.046

  • Fan QY, Sun JX, Chu L, Cui LQ, Quan GX, Yan JL, Hussain Q, Iqbal M (2018) Effects of chemical oxidation on surface oxygen-containing functional groups and adsorption behavior of biochar. Chemosphere 207:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.044

  • Fang Y, Singh B, Singh BP (2015) Effect of temperature on biochar priming effects and its stability in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 80:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.006

  • Farhangi-Abriz S, Torabian S (2018) Effect of biochar on growth and ion contents of bean plant under saline condition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1446-z

  • Gao Y, Li T, Fu Q, Li H, Liu D, Ji Y, Li Q, Cai Y (2020) Biochar application for the improvement of water-soil environments and carbon emissions under freeze-thaw conditions: an in-situ field trial. Sci Total Environ 723(3):138007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138007

  • Hammes K, Torn MS, Lapenas AG (2008) Centennial black carbon turnover observed in a Russian steppe soil. Biogeosciences 5(5):1339-1350. 10.5194/bg-5-1339-2008.

  • Hashimoto Y, Matsufuru H, Takaoka M, Tanida H, Sato T (2009) Impacts of chemical amendment and plant growth on lead speciation and enzyme activities in a shooting range soil: an X-ray absorption fine structure investigation. J Environ Qual 38:1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0427

  • Hockaday WC, Grannas AM, Kim S, Hatcher PG (2007) The transformation and mobility of charcoal in a fire-impacted watershed. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3432–3445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.02.023

  • Kuzyakov Y, Bogomolova I, Glaser B (2014) Biochar stability in soil: decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific14C analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 70:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.021

  • Laghari M, Saffar M, Hu ZQ, Fazal S, Xiao B, Hu M, Chen ZH, Guo DB (2015) Effects of biochar application rate on sandy desert soil properties and sorghum growth. Catena 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.013

  • Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a

  • Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11:403–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5

  • Leng LJ, Huang HJ, Li H, Li J, Zhou WG (2019) Biochar stability assessment methods: a review. Sci Total Environ 647:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.402

  • Li CJ, Xiong YW, Qu ZY, Xu X, Huang QZ, Huang GH (2018) Impact of biochar addition on soil properties and water-fertilizer productivity of tomato in semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia, China. Geoderma 331:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.014

  • Li HX, Lu XQ, Xu Y, Liu HT (2019) How close is artificial biochar aging to natural biochar aging in fields? A meta-analysis. Geoderma 352:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.006

  • Lin Q, Zhang L, Riaz M, Zhang MY, Xia H, Lv B, Jiang CC (2018) Assessing the potential of biochar and aged biochar to alleviate aluminum toxicity in an acid soil for achieving cabbage productivity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 161:290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.010

  • Liu SN, Meng J, Jiang LL, Yang X, Lan Y, Cheng XY, Chen WF (2017) Rice husk biochar impacts soil phosphorous availability, phosphatase activities and bacterial community characteristics in three different soil types. Appl Soil Ecol 116:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.020

  • Ma XZ, Chen LJ, Wu ZJ (2008) Kinetics of soil β-glacosidase under long-term fertilization. Jouranl of Zhejiang University (agriculture and Life Science) 34(5):552–556 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Aeron A, Kumar A, Kim K, Bajpai VK (2015) Potassium solubilizing rhizobacteria (ksr): isolation, identification, and k-release dynamics from waste mica. Ecol Eng 81:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.065

  • Miao W (2014) Ageing effect of biochar on soil nutrients and growth of rice. Shengyang Agricultural University

  • Mizuta K, Matsumoto, T., Hatate, Y., Nishihara, K., Nakanishi, T (2004) Removal of nitrate-nitrogen from drinking water using bamboo powder charcoal. Bioresour Technol 95 (3), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.015

  • Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Weintraub MN (2016) Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 93:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.019

  • Peng X, Wang W (2016) Stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzyme activity along a climatic transect in temperate grasslands of northern China. Soil Biol Biochem 98:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.008

  • Qian L, Chen B (2013a) Dual role of biochars as adsorbents for aluminum: the effects of oxygen-containing organic components and the scattering of silicate particles. Environ Sci Technol 47(15):8759–8768. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401756h

  • Qian L, Chen B, Hu D (2013b) Effective alleviation of aluminum phytotoxicity by manure-derived biochar. Environ Sci Technol 47(6):2737–2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3047872

  • Qian L, Chen M, Chen B (2015) Competitive adsorption of cadmium and aluminum onto fresh and oxidized biochars during aging processes. J Soils Sediments 15(5): 130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1073-y

  • Quan G, Fan Q, Cui L, Zimmerman AR, Wang H, Zhu Z, Gao B, Wu L, Yan J (2020) Simulated photocatalytic aging of biochar in soil ecosystem: Insight into organic carbon release, surface physicochemical properties and cadmium sorption. Environ Res 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109241

  • Sabale RP, Shabeer TPA, Utture SC, Banerjee K, Oulkar DP, Adsule PG, Deshmukh MB (2015) Kresoxim methyl dissipation kinetics and its residue effect on soil extra-cellular and intra-cellular enzymatic activity in four different soils of India. J Environ Sci Health Part B 50:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2015.975600

  • Saha M, Maurya BR, Meena VS, Bahadur I, Kumar A (2016) Identification and characterization of potassium solubilizing bacteria (ksb) from indo-gangetic plains of India. Biocatal Biotransfor 7:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.06.007

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08632

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x

  • Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech, W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171(6):893–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625199

  • Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abulail NI, Fortuna A, Dallmeyer I, Garciaperez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenerg 84:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.010

  • Tatariw C, MacRae JD, Fernandez IJ, Gruselle MC, Salvino CJ, Simon KS (2018) Chronic nitrogen enrichment at the watershed scale does not enhance microbial phosphorus limitation. Ecosystems 21:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0140-1

  • Wang X, Song D, Liang G, Zhang Q, Ai C, Zhou W (2015) Maize biochar addition rate influences soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition in a fluvo-aquic soil. Appl Soil Ecol 96:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.018

  • Wu T, Feng GL, Zeng Z, Chen JH, Xu QF, Liang CF (2014) Effect of biochar addition on ryegrass growth in a pot experiment and its mechanism. Acta Pedologic Sinica 54(2):525–534 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu XW, Wang D, Riaz M, Zhang L, Jiang CC (2019) Investigating the effect of biochar on the potential of increasing cotton yield, potassium efficiency and soil environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ Saf 182(OCT.):109451.1–109451.7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109451

  • Xia H, Riaz M, Zhang M, Liu B, El-desouki Z, Jiang CC (2020) Biochar increases nitrogen use efficiency of maize by relieving aluminum toxicity and improving soil quality in acidic soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 196:110531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110531

  • Xie JG, Hou YP, Yin CX, Kong LL, Qin YB, Li Q, Wang LC (2014) Effect of potassium application and straw returning on spring maize yield, nutrient absorption and soil potassium balance. Plant Nutr Fert Sci 20(5):1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2014.0507

  • Xin LD, Gui TL, Qi ML (2017) Quantity and quality changes of biochar aged for 5years in soil under field conditions. Catena 159

  • Yao FX, Arbestain MC, Virgel S, Blanco F, Arostegui J, Maciáagulló JA (2010) Simulated geochemical weathering of a mineral ash-rich biochar in a modified soxhlet reactor. Chemosphere 80(7):724–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.026

  • Ying JG, Lin QY, Zhang MY, Huang Y, Peng SA, Jiang CC (2016) Mitigative effect of biochar on aluminum toxicity of acid soil and the potential mechanism. Agric Sci China 49(23):4576–4583 (in Chinese).

  • Yuan J, Xu R (2011a) The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use Manage 27:110–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00317.x

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011b) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technol 102:3488–3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.018

  • Zeng L, Qin C, Wang L, Li W (2011) Volatile compounds formed from the pyrolysis of chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 83:1553–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.007

  • Zhang MY, Muhammad R, Zhang L, Xia H, Cong M, Jiang CC (2018) Investigating the effect of biochar and fertilizer on the composition and function of bacteria in red soil. Appl Ecol 139:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.03.021

  • Zhang MY, Riaz M, Liu B, Xia H, El-desouki Z, Jiang CC (2020) Two-year study of biochar: achieving excellent capability of potassium supply via alter clay mineral composition and potassium-dissolving bacteria activity. Sci Total Environ 717:137286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137286

  • Zhang MY, Zhang L, Cong M, Xia H, Jiang CC (2021) Biochar amendment improved fruit quality and soil properties and microbial communities at different depths in citrus production. J Clean Prod 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126062

  • Zhang ZY, Huang L, Liu F, Wang MK, Fu QL, Zhu J (2017) The properties of clay minerals in soil particles from two ultisols, China. Clay Clay Miner 65:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2017.064064

  • Zhu LX, Xiao Q, Cheng HY, Shi BJ, Shen YF, Li SQ (2017) Seasonal dynamics of soil microbial activity after biochar addition in a dryland maize field in North-Western China. Ecol Eng 104, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.026

  • Zwieten LV, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327(1/2):235–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42167042) and the National Key Research and Development of China (2017YFD0200803).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microelement Research Center, College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People’s Republic of China

    Hao Xia, Cong Ming, Yuxuan Li, Xiangling Wang & Cuncang Jiang

  2. The Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecoagriculture, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi University, Shihezi, XinJiang, 832000, People’s Republic of China

    Xiangling Wang & Cuncang Jiang

  3. State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agrobioresources, Root Biology Center, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People’s Republic of China

    Muhammad Riaz

Authors
  1. Hao Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Riaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cong Ming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuxuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiangling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cuncang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

We thank C.C.J. for helping to design and supervising this study; H.X, Y.L, X.W, and M.C for maintaining the experiment process and determining soil physiochemical properties; and R.M for revising the manuscript grammatically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuncang Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The manuscript was reviewed and ethically approved for publication by all authors. The manuscript was reviewed and consents to participate by all authors.

Consent for publication

The manuscript was reviewed and consents to publish by all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 921 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, H., Riaz, M., Ming, C. et al. Assessing the difference of biochar and aged biochar to improve soil fertility and cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) productivity. J Soils Sediments 23, 606–618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03368-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03368-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation