Skip to main content
Log in

Biological effects on incipient motion behavior of sediments with different organic matter content

  • Sediments, Sec 4 • Sediment-Ecology Interactions • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The organic content in urban sewer sediment can significantly influence sediment erosion behavior because of biological activity. In this experimental study, the erosion behavior of sediments with different organic content was investigated to develop a mathematical relationship between the critical shear stress and biological activities.

Materials and methods

Before testing, sediment samples were incubated under two environmental conditions: aerobic conditions with high biological activities and sterile conditions with low biological activities. With different incubation periods, samples were subjected to the scouring test in an open channel flume, by which the incipient motion of sediments was determined.

Results and discussion

Experimental results show that the sediment erosion resistance is simultaneously subject to the strengthening and the weakening effect induced by the biological activity, which is dependent on the incubation period and organic content. For low organic content sediment (volatile solids content < 4%), the biological activity can strengthen the sediment erosion resistance and increase τc, while τc of higher organic content sediment is distinctly reduced.

Conclusions

The biological activity can both strengthen and weaken the sediment erosion resistance. The strengthening effect is attributed to the biofilm formation in the biological activity, whereas the weakening effect is due to the sediment volume expansion by the gas bubble formation. These effects depend on the incubation period and organic content within sediments, which can be used to predict the incipient motion of sediments by modifying the biological influence coefficient. Finally, Shields curves were modified to account for the biological activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahimou F, Semmens MJ, Haugstad G, Novak PJ (2007) Effect of protein, polysaccharide, and oxygen concentration profiles on biofilm cohesiveness. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2905–2910. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02420-06

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avnimelech Y, Ritvo G, Meijer LE, Kochba M (2001) Water content, organic carbon and dry bulk density in flooded sediments. Aquac Eng 25:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasiak R, Verhoeven R, De Sutter R, Tait S (2005) The erosion behaviour of biologically active sewer sediment deposits: observations from a laboratory study. Water Res 39:5221–5231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau BP, Algar C, Johnson BD, Croudace I, Reed A, Furukawa Y, Dorgan KM, Jumars PA, Grader AS, Gardiner BS (2005) Bubble growth and rise in soft sediments. Geology 33:517–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, May R, Ackers J (2003) Self-cleansing sewer design based on sediment transport principles. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 129:276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W, Fang H, Lai H, Huang L, Dey S (2018) Effects of biofilm on turbulence characteristics and the transport of fine sediment. J Soils Sediments 18:3055–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1859-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenu C, Guerif J (1991) Mechanical strength of clay minerals as influenced by an adsorbed polysaccharide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1076–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien N, Wan Z (1999) Mechanics of sediment transport. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

  • Cui L, Chen P, Zhang B, Zhang D, Li J, Martin FL, Zhang K (2015) Interrogating chemical variation via layer-by-layer SERS during biofouling and cleaning of nanofiltration membranes with further investigations into cleaning efficiency. Water Res 87:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David V, Davidova T (2013) Estimations of discharge values for purposes of surface runoff and sediment transport off-site effects assessment. In: EGU 2013 General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna

  • Fang H, Shang Q, Chen M, He G (2014) Changes in the critical erosion velocity for sediment colonized by biofilm. Sedimentology 61:648–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang H, Fazeli M, Cheng W, Huang L, Hu H (2015) Biostabilization and transport of cohesive sediment deposits in the Three Gorges Reservoir. PLoS One 10:e0142673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbersdorf SU, Jancke T, Westrich B, Paterson DM (2008) Microbial stabilization of riverine sediments by extracellular polymeric substances. Geobiology 6:57–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouda H, Ashley RM, Gilmour D, Smith H (2003) Life cycle analysis and sewer solids. Water Sci Technol 47:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Fan C-Y, Raghaven R, Field R (2004) Gate and vacuum flushing of sewer sediment: Laboratory testing. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 130:463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagadorn JW, Mcdowell C (2012) Microbial influence on erosion, grain transport and bedform genesis in sandy substrates under unidirectional flow. Sedimentology 59:795–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israelachvili JN (1992) Intermolecular and surface forces: with applications to colloidal and biological systems (Colloid Science). Academic Press Inc, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lick W, Jin L, Gailani J (2004) Initiation of movement of quartz particles. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 130:755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X-M, Sheng G-P, Luo H-W, Zhang F, Yuan S-J, Xu J, Zeng RJ, Wu J-G, Yu H-Q (2010) Contribution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to the sludge aggregation. Environ Sci Technol 44:4355–4360. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9016766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang J, Lu X, Zhong H (2012) Influence of water treatment agent on the efficiency of intermittent activated sludge treatment system. Pet Process Petrochem 43:92–96 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, Van Beek E (2017) Water resource systems planning and management: An introduction to methods, models, and applications. Springer

  • Ma Y (2014) Study on erosion characteristics and transport principles of sewer sediment in sewerage system. MSc thesis, Zhejiang University (in Chinese)

  • Ma Y, Lei T, Zhang X, Chen Y (2013) Volume replacement method for direct measurement of soil moisture and bulk density. Trans Chinese Soc Agric Engineer 29:86–93. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.09.012 (in Chinese)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malarkey J, Baas JH, Hope JA, Aspden RJ, Parsons DR, Peakall J, Paterson DM, Schindler RJ, Ye L, Lichtman ID (2015) The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development. Nat Commun 6:6257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ota JJ, Perrusquia GS (2013) Particle velocity and sediment transport at the limit of deposition in sewers. Water Sci Technol 67:959–967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piqué G, Vericat D, Sabater S, Batalla RJ (2016) Effects of biofilm on river-bed scour. Sci Total Environ 572:1033–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaresma VS, Amos CL, Flindt M (2004) The influences of biological activity and consolidation time on laboratory cohesive beds. J Sediment Res 74:184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Jepsen R, Gotthard D, Lick W (1998) Effects of particle size and bulk density on erosion of quartz particles. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 124:1261–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seco I, Gómez Valentín M, Schellart A, Tait S (2014) Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment. Water Sci Technol 69:672–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seco I, Schellart A, Gómez-Valentín M, Tait S (2018) Prediction of organic combined sewer sediment release and transport. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 144:04018003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahsavari G, Arnaud-Fassetta G, Bertilotti R, Campisano A, Riou F (2015) Bed evolution under one-episode flushing in a truck sewer in Paris, France. Int J Civil Environ Struct Construct Architect Eng 9:868–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao W, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Xu D, Yao G (2014) Erosion characteristics of sewer sediment with biological actions. J ZheJiang Univ (Engineering Science) 48:1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.06.015 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C-X, You L-Y, Li B-Y (2003) Natural consolidation of deposits and its consequences at the Yellow River Delta. Sci Geogr Sin 23:174–181 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland T, Amos C, Grant J (1998) The effect of buoyant biofilms on the erodibility of sublittoral sediments of a temperate microtidal estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 43:225–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Zhu DZ, Rajaratnam N, van Duin B (2020) Sediment depositions in a submerged storm sewer pipe. J Environ Eng:146

  • Tolhurst T, Consalvey M, Paterson D (2008) Changes in cohesive sediment properties associated with the growth of a diatom biofilm. Hydrobiologia 596:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubertini M, Lefebvre S, Rakotomalala C, Orvain F (2015) Impact of sediment grain-size and biofilm age on epipelic microphytobenthos resuspension. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 467:52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Colen C, Underwood GJ, Serôdio J, Paterson DM (2014) Ecology of intertidal microbial biofilms: mechanisms, patterns and future research needs. J Sea Res 92:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignaga E, Sloan DM, Luo X, Haynes H, Phoenix VR, Sloan WT (2013) Erosion of biofilm-bound fluvial sediments. Nat Geosci 6:770–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vollertsen J, Hvitved-Jacobsen T (2000) Resuspension and oxygen uptake of sediments in combined sewers. Urban Water J 2:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00036-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Tang H-w, Zhao H-q, Zhao X-y, Lü S-q (2015) Incipient motion of sediment in presence of submerged flexible vegetation. Water Sci Eng 8:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-X, Zhang T-Y, Dao G-H, Hu H-Y (2018) Tolerance and resistance characteristics of microalgae Scenedesmus sp. LX1 to methylisothiazolinone. Environ Pollut 241:200–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Wu J, Li H, Liu Z, Chen K, Chen H, Xiong L (2017) Different erosion characteristics of sediment deposits in combined and storm sewers. Water Sci Technol 75:1922–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F-g, Liu X-n, Cao S-y, Huang E, Yang K-j (2010) An uniform formulation of the Shields diagram and its application in the scouring prevention of Tangjiashan barrier lake downstream channel. J Sichuan Univ (Engineering Science Edition) 42:175–179 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong X, Wu Y (2013) Bioclogging in porous media under continuous-flow condition. Environ Earth Sci 68:2417–2425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Chen Y, Shao W (2014) Field study of dynamic behaviour of sediment in combined sewer overflow chambers. P I Civil Eng-Wat Mt 167:489–498. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.13.00027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Ma Y, Fang L, Guo Y (2016) Impacts of biological activities on erosion of sewer sediments. P I Civil Eng-Wat Mt 169:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.14.00134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878597, 51908493), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019QNA4035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Sabine Gerbersdorf

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 516 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Yao, X., Gu, Y. et al. Biological effects on incipient motion behavior of sediments with different organic matter content. J Soils Sediments 21, 627–640 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02807-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02807-9

Keywords

Navigation