Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variable impacts of reduced and zero tillage on soil carbon storage across 4–10 years of UK field experiments

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Reduced tillage has been advocated as a practical measure to increase soil carbon in long-term cropping soils. We examine three medium-term experiments in sites with contrasting soil and climatic characteristics in the UK. The objectives were to determine the effects of different reduced and zero tillage practices on bulk density and soil carbon storage and depth distribution and to quantify the effect of stones in their calculation.

Methods

The treatments were zero tillage, minimum tillage, conventional plough, deep non-inversion tillage and plough compaction. Soil samples were collected from three sites at five depth intervals to approximately 60 cm.

Results

Deep non-inversion and minimum tillage led to 6.5 and 1.6 Mg ha−1 greater SOC than conventional plough in sites under rotation systems. In a monoculture system in Scotland, conventional plough had 25.3, 21.6 and 17.7 Mg ha−1 greater SOC than plough compaction, minimum tillage and zero tillage, respectively. After harvest, bulk density was greater in the soil surface of conventional plough compared with minimum tillage.

Conclusions

Our results suggest variable impacts of reduced tillage on SOC storage. Overall there is limited benefit in using shallow minimum tillage and zero tillage practices in the UK to increase soil carbon storage when a soil profile of 60 cm is considered but other benefits associated to these systems, such as speed of working and timeliness of operations, should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  • Aksakal EL, Öztaş T (2010) Changes in distribution patterns of soil penetration resistance within a silage-corn field following the use of heavy harvesting equipments. Turk J Agric For 34:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kaise MM, Yin XH (2005) Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations. J Environ Qual 34:437–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrasky BJ (1991) Balloon and core sampling for determining bulk density of alluvial desert soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1188–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Angers DA, Eriksen-Hamel NS (2008) Full-inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: a meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(5):1370–1374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angers DA, Bolinder MA, Carter MR, Gregorich EG, Voroney RP, Drury CF, Liang BC, Simard RR, Donald RG, Beyaert RP, Martel J (1997) Impact of tillage practices on organic carbon and nitrogen storage in cool humid soils of eastern Canada. Soil Till Res 41:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Arocena JM (2000) Cations in solution from forest soils subjected to forest floor removal and compaction treatments. Forest Ecol Manag 133(1–2):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson BS, Sparkes DL, Mooney SJ (2007) Using selected soil physical properties of seedbeds to predict crop establishment. Soil Till Res 97:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration: what do we really know? Agric Ecosys Environ 118:1–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balesdent J, Basile-Doelsch I, Chadoeuf J, Cornu S, Derrien D et al (2018) Atmosphere–soil carbon transfer as a function of soil depth. Nature 559(7715):599–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0328-3.hal-02073138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard TM (2000) Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils. Forest Ecol Manag 133(1–2):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballcoelho BR, Roy RC, Swanton CJ (1998) Tillage alters corn root distribution in coarse-textured soil. Soil Till Res 45:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Batey T (2009) Soil compaction and soil management—a review. Soil Use Manag 25:335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Battigelli JP, Spence JR, Langor DW, Berch SM (2004) Short-term impact of forest soil compaction and organic matter removal on soil mesofauna density and oribatid mite diversity. Can J For Res 34:1136–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengough AG (1997) Modelling rooting depth and soil strength in a drying soil profile. J Theor Biol 186(3):327–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brevik E, Fenton T, Moran L (2002) Effect of soil compaction on organic carbon amounts and distribution, south-Central Iowa. Environ Pollut 116(1):S137–S141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dam RF, Mehdi BB, Burgess MSE, Madramootoo CA, Mehuys GR, Callum IR (2005) Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada. Soil Till Res 84:41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimassi B, Mary B, Fontaine S, Perveen N, Revaillot S, Cohan J-P (2014a) Effect of nutrients availability and long-term tillage on priming effect and soil C mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 78:332–339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimassi B, Mary B, Wylleman R, Labreuche J, Couture D, Piraux F, Cohan J-P (2014b) Long-term effect of contrasted tillage and crop management on soil carbon dynamics during 41 years. Agric Ecosys Environ 188:134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan MS, Clapp CE, Allmaras RR, Baker JM, Molina JAE (2006) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Minnesota soil as related to tillage, residue and nitrogen management. Soil Till Res 89:221–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder JW, Lal R (2008) Tillage effects on physical properties of agricultural organic soils of north Central Ohio. Soil Till Res 98:208–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Etana A, Hakansson I (1994) Swedish experiments on the persistence of subsoil compaction caused by vehicles with high axle load. Soil Till Res 29:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina R, Seddaiu G, Orsini R, Steglich E, Roggero PP, Francaviglia R (2011) Soil carbon dynamics and crop productivity as influenced by climate change in a rainfed cereal system under contrasting tillage using EPIC. Soil Till Res 112:36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Gál A, Vyn TJ, Michéli E, Kladivko EJ, McFee WW (2007) Soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation with long-term no-till versus moldboard plowing overestimated with tilled-zone. Soil Till Res 96:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollany HT, Rickman RW, Liang Y, Albrecht SL, Machado S, Kang S (2011) Predicting agricultural management influence on long-term soil organic carbon dynamics: implications for biofuel production. Agron J 103:234–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JA, Giráldez JV, Pastor M, Fereres E (1999) Effects of tillage method on soil physical properties, infiltration and yield in an olive orchard. Soil Till Res 52(3–4):167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Holanda FSR, Mengel DB, Paula MB, Carvaho JG, Bertoni JC (1998) Influence of crop rotations and tillage systems on phosphorus and potassium stratification and root distribution in the soil profile. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:2383–2394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JM (2004) The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence. Agric Ecosys Environ 103:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Coleman K (2009) Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide fluxes. Adv Agron 101:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF (2000) Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry 48(1):21–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2013) Food security in a changing climate. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 13(1):8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2015) Sequestering carbon and increasing productivity by conservation agriculture. Soil Water Conserv 70(3):55A–62A

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR (1994) Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a Central Ohio soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(2):517–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Leij FJ, Ghezzehei TA, Or D (2002) Modeling the dynamics of the soil pore-size distribution. Soil Till Res 64:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie BM, Stobart R, Brown JL, George TS, Morris N, Newton AC, Valentine TA, Hallett PD (2017) Project report No. PR574. Platforms to test and demonstrate sustainable soil management: integration of major UK experiments. AHDB, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Met Office (2015) UK and regional series. Available via https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/datasets.

  • Morris NL, Miller PCH, Orson JH, Froud-Williams RJ (2010) The adoption of non-inversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment - a review. Soil Till Res 108:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins CE (2004) Soil problems worldwide and their solution: lessons for UK agriculture. In: Anon (ed) Managing Soil and Roots for Profitable Production: Focusing on the Agronomic, Environmental and Economic Impact of Cultivation Systems and Establishment Methods. Home Grown Cereals Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton C, Guy DC, Bengough AG, Gordon DC, McKenzie BM, Sun B, Valentine TA, Hallett PD (2012) Soil tillage effects on the efficacy of cultivars and their mixtures in winter barley. Field Crops Research 128:91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Vos C, Don A (2017) Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content. Soil 3:61–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Stirling CM, Jat ML, Gerard BG, Palm CA, Sanchez PA, Cassman KG (2014) Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nat Clim Chang 4:678–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford BJ, Wilson-Rummenie AC, Simpson GB, Bell KL, Ferguson MA (2001) Compacted soil affects soil macrofauna populations in a semi-arid environment in Central Queensland. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1869–1872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky DC (1997) Tillage-induced CO2 emission from soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 49(1–3):273–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Paul EA (2000) Decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, New York, pp 104–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (1999) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainju UM, Singh BP, Whitehead WF (2002) Long-term effects of tillage, cover crops, and nitrogen fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen concentration in sandy loam soils in Georgia, USA. Soil Till Res 63:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (2000) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Malhi SS (2006) Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil Till Res 85:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Phogat VK, Dahiya R, Batra SD (2014) Impact of long-term zero till wheat on soil physical properties and wheat productivity under rice–wheat cropping system. Soil Till Res 140:98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Heikkinen J, Ketoja E, Nuutinen V, Palojärvi A, Sheehy J, Mitra S, Alakukku L, Regina K (2015) Tillage and crop residue management methods had minor effects on the stock and stabilization of topsoil carbon in a 30-year field experiment. Sci Total Environ 518-519:337–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Elliot ET, Paustian K, Doran JW (1998) Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1367–1377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann U, Adams MA, Crawford JW, Field DJ, Henakaarchchi N, Jenkins M, Minasny B, McBratney AB, de Remy de Courcelles V, Singh K, Wheeler I, Abbott L, Angers DA, Baldock J, Bird M, Brookes PC, Chenu C, Jastrow JD, Lal R, Lehmann J, O’Donnell AJ, Parton WJ, Whitehead D, Zimmermann M (2013) The knowns, known unknowns, and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 164:80–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Hallett P, Caul S, Daniell TJ, Hopkins DW (2011) Distribution of soil carbon and microbial biomass in arable soils under different tillage regimes. Plant Soil 338:17–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Archer SR, Monger HC, Waltman S (2012) When bulk density methods matter: implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. J Arid Environ 77:66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • VandenBygaart AJ, Gregorich EG, Angers DA (2003) Influence of agricultural management on soil organic carbon: a compendium and assessment of Canadian studies. Can J Soil Sci 83(4):363–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virto I, Barré P, Burlot A, Chenu C (2012) Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. Biogeochemistry 108:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • VSN International (2018) Genstat for Windows 19th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Web page: Genstat.co.uk

  • West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1930–1946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesmeier M, Spörlein P, Geuß U, Hangen E, Haug S, Reischl A, Schilling B, von Lützow M, Kögel-knabner I (2012) Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth

Download references

Funding

This research was financially supported by AHDB Cereals and Oilseeds grant RD-2012-3786 “Platforms to test and demonstrate sustainable soil management: integration of major UK field experiments” and the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS).

The collection of meteorological data by the James Hutton Institute is supported by underpinning capacity funding provided by the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division of Scottish Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.L. Brown.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hong Jie Di

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 53 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Variance models tested in residual maximum likelihood (REML) analyses. Dev deviance, df degrees of freedom, BIC Bayesian Information Criterion. The three asterisks mark the selected model for each analysis based on the lower BIC number

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, J., Stobart, R., Hallett, P. et al. Variable impacts of reduced and zero tillage on soil carbon storage across 4–10 years of UK field experiments. J Soils Sediments 21, 890–904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02799-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02799-6

Keywords