Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A retrospective analysis on changes in sediment flux in the Mississippi River system: trends, driving forces, and implications

  • Sediments, Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Mississippi River is the largest river in the USA and one of the most regulated rivers in the world. Understanding fluvial sediment flux changes in the Mississippi River system has critical implications for future sustainable development and management strategies.

Materials and methods

We obtained annual runoff and suspended sediment series from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Data Series. Here, we investigated temporal trends and historical phases of fluvial sediment flux, while also quantifying the driving forces of changes in sediment loads in the Mississippi River system using a sediment identity approach and the sediment survey records.

Results and discussion

Since the earliest estimates (initially 400–500 Mt year−1), land-ocean sediment reduction in the Mississippi River system has displayed two temporal phases, decreasing from 350 Mt year−1 during 1952–1962 to 200 Mt year−1 during 1963–2009. The decline in land-ocean sediment flux was the result of an increase in precipitation and water yield capacity being outweighed by a decrease in sediment concentration. It is estimated that a total of 24 Gt of sediment was trapped by dams and reservoirs from 1985 to 2015, while the amount of sediment reduction by soil conservation is estimated to be 15 Gt in the USA. We can deduce that reservoir construction was the dominant driver (~ 62%) influencing land-ocean sediment flux from the Mississippi River system during 1985–2015. During 1950s–1960s, reservoirs played an overwhelmingly primary role in reducing riverine sediments. In the Missouri River basin, the largest contributor of sediment to the lower Mississippi River, we found a dominant role (> 53%) of reservoirs on tributaries in trapping sediments. The decrease in land-ocean sediment flux has caused degradation of the Mississippi River delta.

Conclusions

Human activities are the main factors influencing changes in land-ocean sediment flux. Therefore, there is an urgent need of a basin-wide strategic plan to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks in order to achieve sustainable management of the drainage basin and river delta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison MA, Demas CR, Ebersole BA, Kleiss BA, Little CD, Meselhe EA, Powell NJ, Pratt TC, Vosburg BM (2012) A water and sediment budget for the lower Mississippi–Atchafalaya River in flood years 2008–2010: implications for sediment discharge to the oceans and coastal restoration in Louisiana. J Hydrol 432-433:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkas WR (1995) Transport and sources of sediment in the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and the headwaters of Lake Oahe, North Dakota, May 1988 through April 1991. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Bismarck, North Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J, Iivari T (2000) Sediment damages and recent trends in the United States. Int J Sediments Res 15:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum MD, Roberts HH (2012) The Mississippi delta region: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 40:655–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu ZX, Zhai SK, Lu XX, Liu JP, Xu JX, Xu KH (2009) A quantitative assessment of human impacts on decrease in sediment flux from major Chinese rivers entering the western Pacific Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 36:446–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf WL, Wohl E, Sinha T, Sabo JL (2010) Sedimentation and sustainability of western American reservoirs. Water Resour Res 46:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimann DC, Rasmussen PP, Cline TL, Pigue LM, Wagner HR (2010) Characteristics of sediment data and annual suspended-sediment loads and yields for selected Lower Missouri River mainstem and tributary stations, 1976-2008: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 530, pp 58

  • Heimann DC, Sprague LA, Blevins DW (2011a) Trends in suspended-sediment loads and concentrations in the Mississippi River Basin, 1950-2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5200, pp 33

  • Heimann DC, Cline TL, Glaspie LM (2011b) Suspended-sediment and suspended-sand concentrations and loads for selected streams in the Mississippi River basin, 1940-2009: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 593, pp 6

  • Holeman JN (1968) The sediment yield of major rivers of the world. Water Resour Res 4:737–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz AJ (2010) A quarter century of declining suspended sediment fluxes in the Mississippi River and the effect of the 1993 flood. Hydrol Process 24:13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp GP, Day JW, Rogers JD, Giosan L, Peyronnin N (2016) Enhancing mud supply from the lower Missouri River to the Mississippi River Delta USA: dam bypassing and coastal restoration. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 183:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesel RH (1988) The decline in the suspended load of the lower Mississippi River and its influence on adjacent wetlands. Environ Geol Water Sci 11:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesel RH (2003) Human modifications to the sediment regime of the lower Mississippi River flood plain. Geomorphology 56:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang S, Liu Y, Fu B, Zhao W (2018) Driving forces and their contribution to the recent decrease in sediment flux to ocean of major rivers in China. Sci Total Environ 634:534–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang S, Fu B, Feng X (2019) Frequency analyses of peak discharge and suspended sediment concentration in the United States. J Soils Sediments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02463-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig W, Probst JL, Kempe S (1996) Predicting the oceanic input of organic carbon by continental erosion. Global Biogeochem Cy 10:23–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magleby R, Sandretto C, Crosswhite W, Osborn CT (1995) Soil erosion and conservation in the United States: an overview. Agric Inf Bull 82:726–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade R (1996) Setting: geology, hydrology, sediments, and engineering of the Mississippi River. US Geological Survey Circular USGS Circ, pp:13–30

  • Meade RH, Moody JA (2010) Causes for the decline of suspended-sediment discharge in the Mississippi River system, 1940–2007. Hydrol Process 24:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman JD, Farnsworth KL (2013) River discharge to the coastal ocean: a global synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. J Geol 91:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mize SV, Murphy JC, Diehl TH, Demcheck DK (2018) Suspended-sediment concentrations and loads in the lower Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers decreased by half between 1980 and 2015. J Hydrol 564:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2018) Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) monthly precipitation dataset full V7 version. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.gpcc.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2018

  • Rosen T, Xu YJ (2013) Recent decadal growth of the Atchafalaya River Delta complex: effects of variable riverine sediment input and vegetation succession. Geomorphology 194:108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider U, Finger P, Meyer-Christoffer A, Rustemeier E, Ziese M, Becker A (2017) Evaluating the hydrological cycle over land using the newly-corrected precipitation climatology from the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC). Atmosphere 8:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F (1987) Soil conservation policy in the United States. Environ Manag 11:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JP (2003) Supply and flux of sediment along hydrological pathways: research for the 21st century. Glob Planet Chang 39:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JP, Vörösmarty CJ, Kettner AJ, Green P (2005) Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308:376–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JP, Kettner AJ, Overeem I, Hutton EWH, Hannon MT, Brakenridge GR, Day J, Vörösmarty C, Saito Y, Giosan L (2009) Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat Geosci 2:681–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao B, Tian HQ, Ren W, Yang J, Yang QC, He RY, Cai WJ, Lohrenz S (2014) Increasing Mississippi river discharge throughout the 21st century influenced by changes in climate, land use, and atmospheric CO2. Geophys Res Lett 41:4978–4986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2019) National Inventory of Dams (NID) 2018 version. http://nid.usace.army.mil. Accessed 8 Aug 2019

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2015) Conservation Reserve Program fact sheet. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/FactSheets/archived-fact-sheets/consv_reserve_program.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2001) Variability of dry sediment bulk density between and within retention ponds and its impact on the calculation of sediment yields. Earth Surf Process Landf 26:375–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (2006) Human impact on land–ocean sediment transfer by the world’s rivers. Geomorphology 79:192–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Fang D (2003) Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob Planet Chang 39:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fu B, Piao S, Lü Y, Ciais P, Feng X, Wang Y (2016) Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nat Geosci 9:38–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fu B, Liang W, Liu Y, Wang Y (2017) Driving forces of changes in the water and sediment relationship in the Yellow River. Sci Total Environ 576:453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YK, Schilling KE (2006) Increasing streamflow and baseflow in Mississippi River since the 1940s: effect of land use change. J Hydrol 324:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO. 2017YFA0604701), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41722102), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuai Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alexander Koiter

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, T., Wang, S., Liu, Y. et al. A retrospective analysis on changes in sediment flux in the Mississippi River system: trends, driving forces, and implications. J Soils Sediments 20, 1719–1729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02495-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02495-0

Keywords

Navigation