Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of biochar on fraction and species of antimony in contaminated soil

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Antimony (Sb) is a highly toxic heavy metal, and its amount in soil is increasing due to anthropogenic activities. Excessive Sb intake could ultimately threat human health. Recently, biochar (BC) has been accepted for remediation of Sb-contaminated soil. Understanding the interaction between BC and Sb and the effect of BC-induced changes in soil properties on immobilization/mobilization of Sb will help, therefore, to elucidate the mechanism of BC in immobilization/mobilization of Sb in contaminated soils.

Materials and methods

Wheat straw-derived BC (SBC) and fruit (apple) tree-derived BC (FBC) were obtained at the pyrolysis temperatures of 500 °C. Sb-contaminated soil was incubated with/without 0.5, 5, or 10 wt% of SBC and FBC for 130 days. Change of soil properties induced by BC was explored during the incubation. Dynamic change of Sb fraction and speciation were assessed by the sequential chemical extraction and citric acid extraction, respectively. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to check elemental change of soil with 10% SBC at different incubation times. The correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to analyze relationship between Sb immobilization/mobilization and change of soil properties induced by BC.

Results and discussion

The obvious change of soil properties can be observed when the soil was treated with 10% BC instead of 5 and 0.5% BC. During the first 20 days with SBC incubation and 50 days with FBC incubation, Sb mobilization increased may be because of the electrostatic repulsion of functional groups in BC; OM and functional group of BC govern the reduction reactions, anionic competition, electrostatic repulsion, and biological reduction in soil induced by BC. By contrast, after 20 days with SBC incubation and 50 days with FBC incubation, the mobilization of Sb decreased, which may be attributed to the formation of complexes between Sb and OM of BC, secondary mineral precipitation, and organic complex between Sb and humus acid in soil induced by BC.

Conclusions

It is noteworthy that the application of BC has a potential mobilizing risk for Sb and the final effect depends on BC characteristic and the change of soil properties induced by BC. The possible risks induced by BC should be considered before applying the BC to Sb-contaminated soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Ming Z, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Ok YS, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Kim BY, Ahn JH, Leed YH, Al-Wabelb MI, Lee SE, Lee SS (2016) Lead and copper immobilization in a shooting range soil using soybean stover- and pine needle-derived biochars: chemical, microbial and spectroscopic assessments. J Hazard Mater 301:179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2017) Biochar induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 17:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wang YP, Xia D, Jiang XL, Fu D, Shen L, Wang HT, Li QB (2016) Enhanced bioreduction of iron and arsenic in sediment by biochar amendment influencing microbial community composition and dissolved organic matter content and composition. J Hazard Mater 311:20–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chirenje T, Ma LQ (2002) Impact of high-volume wood-fired boiler ash amendment on soil properties and nutrients. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choppala G, Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Bush R (2016) Differential effect of biochar upon reduction-induced mobility and bioavailability of arsenate and chromate. Chemosphere 144:374–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Zhou R, Ren X, Jia H, Hua L, Xu H, Lv X, Zhao J, Wei T (2018) Effects of salicylic acid, epi-brassinolide and calcium on stress alleviation and cd accumulation in tomato plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 157:491–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huffa MD, Kumarb S, Leea JW (2014) Comparative analysis of pinewood, peanut shell, and bamboo biomass derived biochars produced via hydrothermal conversion and pyrolysis. J Environ Manag 146:303–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husson O (2013) Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism; systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362:389–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Khan S, Hao X, Li G (2016) Biochar effects on metal bioaccumulation and arsenic speciation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) grown in contaminated soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Velde MVD, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL, Murphy DV, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwardsjones G, Deluca TH (2011) Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1723–1731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kong XF, Tian T, Xue SG, Hartley W, Huang LB, Wu C, Li CX (2017) Development of alkaline electrochemical characteristics demonstrates soil formation in bauxite residue undergoing natural rehabilitation. Land Degrad Dev 29:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz AK, Monch H, Johnson CA (2006) Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization. Environ Sci Technol 40:7277–7282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunobu S, Harada T, Takahashi Y (2006) Comparison of antimony behavior with that of arsenic under various soil redox conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 40:7270–7276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunobu S, Takahashi Y, Terada Y, Sakata M (2010) Antimony(V) incorporation into synthetic ferrihydrite, goethite, and natural iron oxyhydroxides. Environ Sci Technol 44:3712–3718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Sarswat A, Yong SO, Jr C (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—a critical review. Bioresour Technol 160:191–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mubarak H, Chai LY, Mirza N, Yang ZH, Pervez A, Tariq M, Shaheen S, Mahmood Q (2015) Antimony (Sb)-pollution and removal techniques—critical assessment of technologies. Toxicol Environ Chem Rev 97:1296–1318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamaru YM, Altansuvd J (2014) Speciation and bioavailability of selenium and antimony in non-flooded and wetland soils: a review. Chemosphere 111:366–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Shahid M, White JC, Nawaz MF, Bashir S, Shakoor MB, Choppala G, Murtaza G, Wang H (2016) Chapter 7—removal and recovery of metals by biosorbents and biochars derived from biowastes. In: Environmental materials and waste: resource recovery and pollution prevention. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 149–177

  • Okkenhaug G, Amstätter K, Bue HL, Cornelissen G, Breedveld GD, Henriksen T, Mulder J (2013) Antimony (Sb) contaminated shooting range soil: Sb mobility and immobilization by soil amendments. Environ Sci Technol 47:6431–6439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierart A, Shahid M, Séjalon-Delmas N, Dumat C (2015) Antimony bioavailability: knowledge and research perspectives for sustainable agricultures. J Hazard Mater 289:219–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauret G, López-Sánchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Davidson C, Ure A, Quevauviller P (1999) Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit 1:57–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren X, Zhang P, Zhao L, Sun H (2016) Sorption and degradation of carbaryl in soils amended with biochars: influence of biochar type and content. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2724–2734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Ferrand E, Schreck E, Dumat C (2013) Behavior and impact of zirconium in the soil plant system: plant uptake and phytotoxicity. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 221:107–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silveria MLA, Alleoni LRF, Guilherme LRG (2003) Biosolids and heavymetals in soils. Sci Agric 60:793–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smebye A, Alling V, Vogt RD, Gadmar TC, Mulder J, Cornelissen G, Hale SE (2016) Biochar amendment to soil changes dissolved organic matter content and composition. Chemosphere 142:100–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaccini R, Baiano S, Gigliotti G, Piccolo A (2008) Molecular characterization of a compost and its water-soluble fractions. J Agric Food Chem 56:1017–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Xiao E, Xiao T, Krumins V, Wang Q, Häggblom M, Dong Y, Tang S, Hu M, Li B, Xia B, Liu W (2017) Response of soil microbial communities to elevated antimony and arsenic contamination indicates the relationship between the innate microbiota and contaminant fractions. Environ Sci Technol 51:9165–9175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tella M, Pokrovski GS (2008) Antimony (V) complexing with O-bearing organic ligands in aqueous solution: an X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and potentiometric study. Mineral Mag 72:205–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terry LR, Kulp TR, Wiatrowski H, Miller LG, Oremland RS (2015) Microbiological oxidation of antimony (III) with oxygen or nitrate by bacteria isolated from contaminated mine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:8478–8488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vithanage M, Herath I, Joseph S, Bundschuh J, Bolan N, Yong SO, Kirkham MB, Rinklebe J (2017) Interaction of arsenic with biochar in soil and water: a critical review. Carbon 113:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan XM, Tandy S, Hockmann K, Schulin R (2013) Changes in Sb speciation with waterlogging of shooting range soils and impacts on plant uptake. Environ Pollut 172:53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Xue XM, Juhasz AL, Chang ZZ, Li HB (2016) Biochar increases arsenic release from an anaerobic paddy soil due to enhanced microbial reduction of iron and arsenic. Environ Pollut 220:514–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Huang L, Xue SG, Pan WS, Zou Q, Hartley W, Wong MH (2016) Oxic and anoxic conditions affect arsenic (As) accumulation and arsenite transporter expression in rice. Chemosphere 168:969–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Shi LZ, Xue SG, Li WC, Jiang XX, Rajendran M, Qian ZY (2019) Effect of sulfur-iron modified biochar on the available cadmium and bacterial community structure in contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ 47:1158–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao E, Krumins V, Xiao T, Dong Y, Tang S, Ning Z, Huang ZY, Sun WM (2017) Depth-resolved microbial community analyses in two contrasting soil cores contaminated by antimony and arsenic. Environ Pollut 221:244–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue SG, Shi LZ, Wu C, Wu H, Qin YY, Pan W, Hartley W, Cui MQ (2017) Cadmium, lead, and arsenic contamination in paddy soils of a mining area and their exposure effects on human HEPG2 and keratinocyte cell-lines. Environ Res 156:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan W, Su Q, Sun ZJ, Shen YQ, Li JN, Zhu XL, Hou H, Chen ZP, Wu FC (2016) The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant uptake, fractions, and speciation of antimony. Appl Soil Ecol 107:244–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Q, An WH, Wu C, Li WC, Fu AQ, Xiao RY, Chen HK, Xue SG (2018) Red mud-modified biochar reduces soil arsenic availability and changes bacterial composition. Environ Chem Lett 16:615–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the 13th Five-Year Key Research Program of China (2017YFB0308303) and the Key Researcher & Development programs in Shaanxi (2018SF363).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Environmental Science and Technology, Shanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi an, 710021, Shanxi, China

    Li Hua, Huan Zhang, Ting Wei, ChunYan Yang & JunKang Guo

Authors
  1. Li Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ChunYan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. JunKang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Hua or Ting Wei.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yong Sik Ok

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hua, L., Zhang, H., Wei, T. et al. Effect of biochar on fraction and species of antimony in contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 19, 2836–2849 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02251-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02251-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation