Advertisement

Rapid quantification of humic components in concentrated humate fertilizer solutions by FTIR spectroscopy

  • Evgeniya Karpukhina
  • Ivan Mikheev
  • Irina Perminova
  • Dmitry Volkov
  • Mikhail Proskurnin
Humic Substances and Nature-like Technologies
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The use of humic substances is under thorough discussion of state-of-the-art agricultural science. They are marketed mostly as concentrated aqueous solutions of potassium or sodium humates, which are produced by alkali extraction of raw organic matter such as lignite, leonardite, or peat. Due to the presence of clay minerals in the raw materials, humate solutions are characterized with a substantial content of silicates. At the same time, rapid quantification techniques for selective determination of humic components and silicates in humate solutions are missing. The aim of this work was to develop an IR spectroscopic technique for rapid quantification of humic substances (HSs) and silicates in concentrated humate solutions with the minimum sample preparation, which could be used for quality control of humic fertilizers.

Materials and methods

Sodium humate from Sigma-Aldrich and two potassium humate fertilizers available on the market were used for the experiments. For FTIR measurements, thin-layer open-cell (DialPath) transmission and attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessories were used. The secondary focus of this work was the use of a compact portable IR spectrometer, which can be used in the field. Total carbon analyzer and ICP-AES for determination of silicon and aluminum contents were used.

Results and discussion

FTIR spectra were registered for both dry samples and aqueous solutions of the humates. The most intense bands in IR spectra of HS were characterized with linear concentration dependences in the range of concentrations of 2–200 g L−1 of HS. The most sensitive band was shown to be 1560 cm−1. It corresponded to carboxyl groups (COO) of humates (limits of detection [recalculated to carbon] for transmission and ATR modes are 3 and 1 g L−1, respectively). The band at 1015 cm−1 was attributed to silicate. It did not overlap with the bands of organic constituents and could be used for silicate quantification. The proposed technique can identify different trademarks of the fertilizers by the amount of both HS and silicate.

Conclusions

Rapid determination of humate and silicate components comprising three samples of humic fertilizers was proposed without isolation of the analytes from solution.

Keywords

ATR Humate aqueous solutions Humic substances Infrared spectroscopy Silicates 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project 16-14-00167).

Supplementary material

11368_2018_2133_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (400 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 399 kb)

References

  1. Allard B, Borén H, Grimvall A (1991) Humic substances in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: proceedings of an international symposium, Linköping, Sweden, August 21–23, 1989. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  2. Billingham K (2015) Humic products: potential or presumption for agriculture. Department of Primary Industries, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabaniss SE (1991) Carboxylic-acid content of a fulvic-acid detrmined by potentiometry and aqueous fourier-transform infrared spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 255:23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(91)85082-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A (2015) Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic 196:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis WM, Erickson CL, Johnston CT, Delfino JJ, Porter JE (1999) Quantitative fourier transform infrared spectroscopic investigation humic substance functional group composition. Chemosphere 38:2913–2928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00486-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Melo BAG, Motta FL, Santana MHA (2016) Humic acids: structural properties and multiple functionalities for novel technological developments. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 62:967–974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Pascale S, Rouphael Y, Colla G (2017) Plant biostimulants: innovative tool for enhancing plant nutrition in organic farming. Eur J Hortic Sci 82:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elsohaby I, Burns JB, Riley CB, Shaw RA, McClure JT (2017) Application of laboratory and portable attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopic approaches for rapid quantification of alpaca serum immunoglobulin G. PLoS One 12:e0179644.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuentes M, Baigorri R, Gonzalez-Gaitano G, Garcia-Mina JM (2018) New methodology to assess the quantity and quality of humic substances in organic materials and commercial products for agriculture. J Soils Sediments 18:1389–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1514-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerstl Z (1989) Toxic organic chemicals in porous media. Ecological studies. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Hadžija O, Špoljar B (1995) Quantitative determination of carboxylate by infrared spectroscopy: application to humic acids. Fresenius J Anal Chem 351:692–693.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hautala K, Peuravuori J, Pihlaja K (2000) Measurement of aquatic humus content by spectroscopic analyses. Water Res 34:246–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00137-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hay MB, Myneni SCB (2007) Structural environments of carboxyl groups in natural organic molecules from terrestrial systems. Part 1: infrared spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3518–3532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.03.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hejzlar J, Szpakowska B, Wershaw RL (1994) Comparison of humic substances isolated from peatbog water by sorption on DEAE-cellulose and amberlite XAD-2. Water Res 28:1961–1970.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)90171-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemati A, Alikhani H, Bagheri Marandi G (2012) Extractants and extraction time effects on physicochemical properties of humic acid. Extractants and extraction time effects on physicochemical properties of humic acid. Int J Agric Res Rev 2:975–984Google Scholar
  16. Holland A, Duivenvoorden LJ, Kinnear SHW (2016) Humic substances: remediation option for anthropogenically acidified waterways. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 15:665–676.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-016-9414-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson N, Baker A, Reynolds D (2007) Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters - a review. River Res Appl 23:631–649.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joshi R, Singh J, Vig AP (2015) Vermicompost as an effective organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent: effect on growth, yield and quality of plants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:137–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-014-9347-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamar RT, Olk DC, Mayhew L, Bloom PR (2014) A new standardized method for quantification of humic and fulvic acids in humic ores and commercial products. J AOAC Int 97:721–730.  https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.13-393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lumsdon DG, Fraser AR (2005) Infrared spectroscopic evidence supporting heterogeneous site binding models for humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 39:6624–6631.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es050180i CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynch BM, Smith-Palmer T (1992) Interpretation of FTIR spectral features in the 1000-1200 cm−1 region in humic acids - contributions from particulate silica in different sampling media. Can J Appl Spectrosc 37:126–131Google Scholar
  22. MacCarthy P, Mark HB, Griffiths PR (1975) Direct measurement of the infrared spectra of humic substances in water by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 23:600–602.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60199a009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madejova J, Komadel P (2001) Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: infrared methods. Clay Clay Min 49:410–432.  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney KJ, McCreary C, Depuydt D, Gillard CL (2017) Fulvic and humic acid fertilizers are ineffective in dry bean. Can J Plant Sci 97:202–205Google Scholar
  25. Malcolm RL (1976) Method and importance of obtaining humic and fulvic acids of high purity. J Res U S Geol Surv 4:37–40Google Scholar
  26. Mobed JJ, Hemmingsen SL, Autry JL, McGown LB (1996) Fluorescence characterization of IHSS humic substances: total luminescence spectra with absorbance correction. Environ Sci Technol 30:3061–3065.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es960132l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morra MJ, Marshall DB, Lee CM (1989) FT-IR analysis of Aldrich humic acid in water using cylindrical internal reflectance. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20:851–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mostofa KMG et al (2013) Dissolved organic matter in natural waters. In: Mostofa KMG, Yoshioka T, Mottaleb A, Vione D (eds) Photobiogeochemistry of organic matter: principles and practices in water environments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 1–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nardi S, Ertani A, Francioso O (2017) Soil-root cross-talking: the role of humic substances. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 180:5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlov DS (1995) Humic substances of soils and general theory of humification. A A Balkema Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinheiro JP, Monteiro ASC, Janot N, Groenenberg BJ, Rosa AH (2017) Trace metal thermodynamic speciation with humic substances: the NICA-Donnan model. Quim Nova 40:1191–1203Google Scholar
  32. Ramer G, Lendl B (2013) Attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Online.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a9287
  33. Sakellariadou F (2006) Spectroscopic studies of humic acids from subsurface sediment samples collected across the Aegean Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci 7:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Senesi N, Miano TM (1994) Humic substances in the global environment and implications on human health: proceedings of the 6th International Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society, Monopoli (Bari), Italy, September 20–25, 1992. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  35. Senesi N, Miano TM, Provenzano MR, Brunetti G (1989) Spectroscopic and compositional comparative characterization of I.H.S.S. reference and standard fulvic and humic acids of various origin. Sci Total Environ 81-2:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senesi N, D'Orazio V, Ricca G (2003) Humic acids in the first generation of EUROSOILS. Geoderma 116:325–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00107-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shirshova LT, Ghabbour EA, Davies G (2006) Spectroscopic characterization of humic acid fractions isolated from soil using different extraction procedures. Geoderma 133:204–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry (second edition). Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07310.x
  40. Stevenson FJ, Goh KM (1971) Infrared spectra of humic acids and related substances. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 35:471–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(71)90044-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevenson FJ, Goh KM (1974) Infrared spectra of humic acids: elimination of interference due to hygroscopic moisture and structural changes accompanying heating with KBr. Soil Sci 117:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197401000-00005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tan KH (2014) Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies, second edition. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanaka T, Nagao S, Ogawa H (2002a) Attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy of functional groups of humic acid dissolving in aqueous solution. Analytical Sciences/Supplements 17:i1081–i1084.  https://doi.org/10.14891/analscisp.17icas.0.i1081.0
  44. Tanaka T, Sakamoto Y, Ogawa H (2002b) In situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopy for functional groups of humic substances complexing with metal ions. J Nuclear Fuel Cy Environ 9:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tremblay L, Gagné J-P (2002) Fast quantification of humic substances and organic matter by direct analysis of sediments using DRIFT spectroscopy. Anal Chem 74:2985–2993.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac011043g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Rensburg CEJ (2015) The antiinflammatory properties of humic substances: a mini review. Phytother Res 29:791–795.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veryho N, Ponikowska I, Latour T (2016) Humus acids - physico-chemical properties, the mechanism of action and applications in balneotherapy. Acta Balneol 58:45–49Google Scholar
  48. Violante A, Bollag JM, Gianfreda L, Huang PM (2002) Dynamics, mobility and transformation of pollutants and nutrients. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  49. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH (2017) Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci 7:2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations