Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1500–1506 | Cite as

The role of cytokinins, ethephon, and chlorocholine chloride in the native proteolytic activity of forest soils

  • Ladislav Holik
  • Valerie Vranová
  • Klement Rejšek
Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Short Original Communication
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) synthesizes and exports phytohormones which are called plant growth regulators (PGRs). These PGRs may play a regulatory role in plant growth and development. PGRs are organic substances that influence physiological processes of plants at extremely low concentrations. The objective of this study was to find out whether three PGRs, cytokinins, ethephon, and chlorocholine, have a stimulatory or inhibitory effect on the activity of native proteases in soil.

Materials and methods

A revised methodology was used to determine soil protease activity, where TRIS-HCl buffer was replaced with demineralized water. This is described as native protease activity as its activity is not affected by chemicals. The aim was to approximate the protease response to cytokinins in the native soil environment. The native soil proteolytic activity was determined spectrophotometrically.

Results and discussion

The present paper shows that cytokinin, ethephon, and chlorocholine chloride negatively affect the native proteolytic activity of forest soils with the exceptions of the organic and organomineral horizons of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on a rendzic Leptosol. In addition, 6-benzylaminopurine stimulates the native proteolytic activity of the organic horizon of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). A negative effect of cytokinins on the soil proteolytic activity can decrease the rate of organic matter decomposition. The results provide soil biochemists with an insight into the roles of rhizospheric substances on soil microbial activity.

Conclusions

This work has shown that cytokinins and PGRs inhibit the activity of native soil proteases in most of the studied forest sites. Results describe the effect of rhizospheric compounds on the activity of soil microorganisms, with potentially significant implications for the nitrogen cycle in forest soils.

Keywords

Chlorocholine chloride Cytokinin Ethephone Forest soil Soil proteases 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was created within the framework of Grant TA04020888 (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic).

References

  1. Amara U, Khalid R, Hayat R (2015) Soil bacteria and phytohormones for sustainable crop production, bacterial metabolites. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Sustainable agroecosystem, Vol. 12 of the series sustainable development and biodiversity. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 87–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24654-3_5 Google Scholar
  2. Anosheh HP, Emam Y, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2012) Exogenous application of salicylic acid and chlormequat chloride alleviates negative effects of drought stress in wheat. Adv Stud Biol 4(11):501–520Google Scholar
  3. Buhrig W, Thornton MK, Olsen N, Morishita D, McIntosh C (2015) The influence of ethephon application timing and rate on plant growth, yield, tuber size distribution and skin color of red LaSoda potatoes. Am J Potato Res 92(1):100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-014-9417-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Čatská V, Vraný J (1976) Rhizosphere mycoflora of wheat after foliar application of chlorocholine chloride, urea and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid. Fol Microbiol 21(4):268–273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02876902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chanclud E, Morel JB (2016) Plant hormones: a fungal point of view. Mol Plant Pathol 17(8):1289–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang Z, Liu Y, Dong H, Teng K, Han L, Zhang X (2016) Effects of cytokinin and nitrogen on drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass. PLoS One 11(4):e0154005.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chauhan H, Bagyaraj DJ, Selvakumar G, Sundaram SP (2015) Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria–prospects and potential. App Soil Ecol 95:38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi W, Li J, He B, Chai X, Xu X, Sun X, Jiang J, Feng P, Zuo J, Lin R, Rochaix J-D, Zhang L (2016) DEG9, a serine protease, modulates cytokinin and light signaling by regulating the level of Arabidopsis Response Regulator 4. PNAS 113(25):3568–3576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosme M, Ramireddy E, Franken P, Schmülling T, Wurst S (2016) Shoot-and root-borne cytokinin influences arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 26(7):709–720.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0706-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cycoń M, Lewandowska A, Piotrowska-Seget Z (2012) Mineralization dynamics of chlormequat chloride (CCC) in soils of different textures. Pol J Environ Stud 21(3):595–602Google Scholar
  11. Farooq UZ, Bano A (2006) Effect of abscisic acid and chlorocholine chloride on nodulation and biochemical content of Vigna radiata L. under water stress. Pak J Bot 38(5):1511–1518Google Scholar
  12. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Cogt Food Agric 2(1):1–19Google Scholar
  14. Großkinsky DK, Tafner R, Moreno MV, Stenglein SA, García de Salamone IE, Nelson LM, Novák O, Strnad M, van der Graaff E, Roitsch T (2016) Cytokinin production by Pseudomonas fluorescens G20-18 determines biocontrol activity against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep 6(1):23310.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holík L, Vranová V, Rosíková J, Rejšek K (2017) Protease activity of forest soils and their responses to phenolic compounds in soil. Chem List 111:47–49Google Scholar
  16. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015 international soil classification system for naming soil and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Report No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Joint FAO (2005) Pesticide residues in food. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues, Rome, Italy, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  18. Khan NA, Mir MR, Nazar R, Singh S (2008) The application of ethephon (an ethylene releaser) increases growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen accumulation in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under high nitrogen levels. Plant Biol 10(5):534–538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00054.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kudoyarova GR, Melentiev AI, Martynenko EV, Timergalina LN, Arkhipova TN, Shendel GV, Kuz'mina LY, Dodd IC, Veselov SY (2014) Cytokinin producing bacteria stimulate amino acid deposition by wheat roots. Plant Physiol Biochem 83:285–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laplaze L, Benkova E, Casimiro I, Maes L, Vanneste S, Swarup R, Weijers D, Calvo V, Parizot B, Begon M, Herrera-Rodriguez OR, Graham N, Doumas P, Friml J, Bogusz D, Beeckman T, Bennette M (2007) Cytokinins act directly on lateral root founder cells to inhibit root initiation. Plant Cell 19(12):3889–3900.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.055863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin B, Zhao X, Zheng Y, Qi S, Liu X (2017) Effect of grazing intensity on protozoan community, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. J Soils Sediments 17(12):2752–2762.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1695-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lugtenberg BJ, Malfanova N, Kamilova F, Berg G (2013) Plant growth promotion by microbes. Molecular microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp 561–573.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118297674.ch53 Google Scholar
  23. Maheshwari DK, Dheeman S, Agarwal M (2015) Phytohormone-producing PGPR for sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacterial metabolites in sustainable agroecosystem. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 159–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24654-3_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miri M, Janakirama P, Held M, Ross L, Szczyglowski K (2016) Into the root: how cytokinin controls rhizobial infection. Trends Plant Sci 21(3):178–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mori Y, Miyahara F, Tsutsumi Y, Kondo R (2011) Effects of combinational treatment with ethephon and indole-3-butyric acid on adventitious rooting of Pinus thunbergii cuttings. Plant Growth Reg 63(3):271–278.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9524-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ndeddy Aka RJ, Babalola OO (2016) Effect of bacterial inoculation of strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Alcaligenes feacalis and Bacillus subtilis on germination, growth and heavy metal (Cd, Cr, and Ni) uptake of Brassica juncea. Int J Phytoremediation 18(2):200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1073671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ortíz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, López-Bucio J (2009) The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 4(8):701–712.  https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.8.9047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qiu M, Li S, Zhou X, Cui X, Vivanco JM, Zhang N, Shen Q, Zhang R (2014) De-coupling of root–microbiome associations followed by antagonist inoculation improves rhizosphere soil suppressiveness. Biol Fertil Soils 50(2):217–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0835-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rejsek K, Formanek P, Pavelka M (2008) Estimation of protease activity in soils at low temperatures by casein amendment and with substitution of buffer by demineralized water. Amino Acids 35(2):411–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-007-0601-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rupp LA, Mudge KW, Negm FB (1989) Involvement of ethylene in ectomycorrhiza formation and dichotomous branching of roots of mugo pine seedlings. Can J Bot 67(2):477–482.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b89-067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stirk WA, van Staden J (2010) Flow of cytokinins through the environment. Plant Growth Regul 62(2):101–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9481-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Venturi V, Keel C (2016) Signaling in the rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci 21(3):187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veselov DS, Kudoyarova GR, Kudryakovab NV, Kusnetsov VV (2017) Role of cytokinins in stress resistance of plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 64(1):15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443717010162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zahajská L, Nisler J, Voller J, Gucký T, Pospíšil T, Spíchal L, Strnad M (2017) Preparation, characterization and biological activity of C8-substituted cytokinins. Phytochemistry 135:115–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu H, Taylor AA, Astor SR, Terry N (2017) Enhancing saltgrass germination and growth in a saline soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Plant Soil 412(1–2):189–199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3051-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management of Nutrients in AgrosystemsCrop Research InstitutePrague 6 - RuzyněCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood TechnologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations