A data-driven fuzzy approach to simulate the critical shear stress of mixed cohesive/non-cohesive sediments
- 53 Downloads
The critical shear stress of cohesive and mixed cohesive/non-cohesive sediments is affected by multiple interacting physical, chemical and biological parameters. There are various mathematical approaches in the scientific literature for computing critical shear stress. However, processes that influence sediment stability are still not fully understood, and available formulas differ considerably. These discrepancies in the literature arise from random system behaviour (natural variability of the sediments), different definitions of the critical shear stress, different measurement techniques and different model frameworks (scope of the parameters, undisturbed versus artificial sediment samples). While analytical approaches fail to address the involved uncertainties, fuzzy logic-based models integrate uncertainty and imprecision.
Materials and methods
With this in mind, a data-driven neuro-fuzzy model (ANFIS) was used to determine the critical shear stress based on sediment characteristics such as wet bulk density and grain size distribution. In order to select model predictors systematically, an automated stepwise regression algorithm was applied. The database for this analysis consisted of 447 measurements of the critical shear stress originating from 64 undisturbed sediment samples.
Results and discussion
The study identified clay content as the primarily controlling variable for erosion resistance. Depending on the characteristics of the sampling location, the bulk density was also selected as a model predictor. In comparison to analytical models that are available in the scientific literature, the fuzzy model achieved higher correlation coefficients between measured and predicted data.
The neuro-fuzzy-model includes uncertainties of input variables and their interactions directly. Thus, it provides a reliable method for the prediction of erosion thresholds of cohesive/non-cohesive mixtures. It was also shown that this approach requires fewer measured variables as well as fewer assumptions than the models it was compared to.
KeywordsANFIS Critical shear stress Data-driven modelling Fuzzy logic Mixed cohesive/non-cohesive sediments
The authors would like to acknowledge the German Federal Waterways and Shipping Authority in conjunction with the German Federal Institute of Hydrology and the Agency for Flood Defense and Water Management of Saxony-Anhalt for funding and their support during the measuring campaigns.
- Aberle J (2008) Measurement techniques for the estimation of cohesive sediment erosion. In: Rowiński, P.M. (ed), Hydraulic methods for catastrophes: floods, droughts, environmental disasters, 10th edn. Publs. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sc., pp 5–20Google Scholar
- Ahmad MF, Dong P, Mamat M, Wan Nik WB, Mohd MH (2011) The critical shear stresses for sand and mud mixture. Appl Math Sci 5:53–71Google Scholar
- Debnath K, Nikora V, Aberle J, Westrich B, Muste M (2007) Erosion of cohesive sediments: resuspension, bed load, and erosion patterns from field experiments. J Hydraul Eng 133:5(508)Google Scholar
- Gerbersdorf SU, Jancke T, Westrich B (2007) Sediment properties for assessing the erosion risk of contaminated riverine sites. An approach to evaluate sediment properties and their covariance patterns over depth in relation to erosion resistance. First investigations in natural sediments. J Soils Sediments 7:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kern U, Haag I, Schürlein V, Holzwarth M, Westrich B (1999) Ein Strömungskanal zur Ermittlung der tiefenabhängigen Erosionsstabilität von Gewässersedimenten: das SETEG-System. WasserWirtschaft 89(2):72–77Google Scholar
- Kothyari UC, Jain RK (2008) Influence of cohesion on the incipient motion condition of sediment mixtures. Water Resour Res 44, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006326
- Kruse R, Gebhardt J, Klawonn F (1994) Foundations of fuzzy systems. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- MathWorks, Inc. (2015a) MATLAB statistics and machine learning ToolboxTM – User’s guide. Version 10.1 (Release 2015b)Google Scholar
- MathWorks, Inc. (2015b) MATLAB fuzzy logic ToolboxTM – User’s Guide. Version 10.1 (Release 2015b)Google Scholar
- Mitchener H, Torfs H, Whitehouse R (1996) Erosion of mud/sand mixtures [Coastal Eng., 29 (1996) 1–25]. Coast Eng 30(3–4):319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(97)00002-1
- Panagiotopoulos I, Voulgaris G, Collins MB (1997) The influence of clay on the threshold of movement of fine sandy beds. Coast Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(97)00013-6
- Tolossa HG (2012) Sediment transport computation using a data-driven adaptive neuro-fuzzy modelling approach. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Mitteilungen Institut für Wasser- und UmweltsystemmodellierungGoogle Scholar
- van Ledden M (2003) Sand-mud segregation in estuaries and tidal basins. TU DelftGoogle Scholar
- Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston, International geophysics seriesGoogle Scholar
- Wu W (2016) Mixed cohesive and noncohesive sediment transport: a state of the art review. In: River sedimentation. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 9–18Google Scholar
- Xiao X, Cai Z (1997) Quantification of uncertainty and training of fuzzy logic systems, in: intelligent processing systems. 1997 I.E. international conference on intelligent processing systems. IEEE, pp 312–316Google Scholar