Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 2847–2855 | Cite as

Impacts of sea-level rise on sediment microbial community structure and function in two New England salt marshes, USA

  • Matt R. Simon
  • Gregory P. Zogg
  • Steven E. Travis
Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

There is growing evidence for a tight linkage between the structure and function of microbial communities and for the importance of this relationship in ecosystem responses to disturbances such as sea-level rise (SLR). While the role of plants in determining the capacity of salt marshes to keep pace with SLR through sediment accretion has received considerable attention, the role of microbes in offsetting these gains via decomposition is less understood.

Materials and methods

We conducted a controlled experiment to determine the structural and functional responses of microbes to SLR, using soil from the low intertidal zone of two New England salt marshes in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, USA. We used terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (t-RFLPs) generated from microbial 16S rDNA to evaluate community composition and diversity and focused on changes in respiration with SLR, measured as total respired carbon normalized by percent organic matter, as a surrogate for decomposition rate.

Results and discussion

We observed a 24% reduction in microbial respiration with a simulated rise in sea level of 40 cm. This functional change was accompanied by a structural shift in microbial community composition among samples from New Hampshire but not Massachusetts, assessed via principal coordinate analysis of t-RFLP data. We also found greater microbial diversity within our New Hampshire samples, suggesting that low diversity may constrain community compositional shifts.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that decreased microbial respiration could alleviate the negative effects of SLR on salt marsh surface elevation, at least in the short term, and that the diversity of the soil microbial community may positively influence functional responses such as respiration.

Keywords

Microbial community structure Microbial diversity Microbial respiration Sea-level rise Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ryan Kingston, Bin Yang, Sultan Ghuman, and Gale Loescher for their help with field collections and microbial cage construction. For granting us access to the marsh sites, we thank Michele Dionne, Paul Stacey, Chris Weidman, Bob Scarborough, Patricia Delgado, and Linda Blum. We thank Shaun Gill and Tim Arienti for their help and expertise with the flow-through seawater system. Funding for this research was provided by the University of New England Biology graduate program. This research (or a portion thereof) was conducted in the National Estuarine Research Reserve System under a Graduate Research Fellowship award to M. Simon from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allison SD, Martiny JB (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:11512–11519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH (2014) Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwood CB, Hudleston D, Zak DR, Buyer JS (2007) Interpreting ecological diversity indices applied to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data: insights from simulated microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5276–5283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blum LK, Roberts MS, Garland JL, Mills AL (2004) Distribution of microbial communities associated with the dominant high marsh plants and sediments of the United States east coast. Microb Ecol gy 48:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen JL, Crump BC, Deegan LA, Hobbie JE (2009) Salt marsh sediment bacteria: their distribution and response to external nutrient inputs. The ISME J 3:924–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen JL, Ward BB, Morrison HG et al (2011) Microbial community composition in sediments resists perturbation by nutrient enrichment. The ISME J 5:1540–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers LG, Guevara R, Boyer JN et al (2016) Effects of salinity and inundation on microbial community structure and function in a mangrove peat soil. Wetlands 36:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (2003) Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochem Cy 17:1111–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Church JA, Clark PU, Gregory JM et al (2013) Sea level change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLaune RD, Pezeshki SR (2003) The role of soil organic carbon in maintaining surface elevation in rapidly subsiding U.S. Gulf of Mexico coastal marshes. Water Air Soil Pollut: Focus 3:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enwall K, Hallin S (2009) Comparison of T-RFLP and DGGE techniques to assess denitrifier community composition in soil. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin RB, Blum LK, McComb AC, Mills AL (2002) A geostatistical analysis of small-scale spatial variability in bacterial abundance and community structure in salt marsh creek bank sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher JL, Plumley FG (1979) Underground biomass profiles and productivity in Atlantic coastal marshes. Am J Bot 66:156–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gasol JM, Comerma M, García JC et al (2002) A transplant experiment to identify the factors controlling bacterial abundance, activity, production, and community composition in a eutrophic canyon-shaped reservoir. Limnol Oceanogr 47:62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gewant D, Bollens SM (2012) Fish assemblages of interior tidal marsh channels in relation to environmental variables in the upper San Francisco estuary. Environ Biol Fish 94:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, et al (2016) Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Terrestrial Microbiology 7(214). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00214
  17. Heiri O, Lotter AF, Lemcke G (2001) Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J Paleolimnol 25:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Isacch JP, Cardoni DA, Iribarne OO (2013) Diversity and habitat distribution of birds in coastal marshes and comparisons with surrounding upland habitats in southeastern South America. Estuar Coast 37:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim S, Marsh TL (2008) The analysis of microbial communities with terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (t-RFLP). In: Kowalchuk GA, de Bruijin FJ, Head IM et al (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual second edition, vol 1. Springer, Dordecht, pp 789–808Google Scholar
  20. Kirwan ML, Langley JA, Guntenspergen GR, Megonigal JP (2013) The impact of sea-level rise on organic matter decay rates in Chesapeake Bay brackish tidal marshes. Biogeosciences 10:1869–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirwan ML, Mudd SM (2012) Response of salt-marsh carbon accumulation to climate change. Nature 489:550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirwan M, Temmerman S (2009) Coastal marsh response to historical and future sea-level acceleration. Quat Sci Rev 28:1801–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller WD, Neubauer SC, Anderson IC (2001) Effects of sea level induced disturbances on high salt marsh metabolism. Estuaries 24:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris JT, Sundareshwar PV, Nietch CT et al (2002) Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83:2869–2877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:5269–5273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neumeier U, Amos CL (2006) The influence of vegetation on turbulence and flow velocities in European salt-marshes. Sedimentology 53:259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nyman JA, DeLaune RD (1991) CO2 emission and soil Eh responses to different hydrological conditions in fresh, brackish, and saline marsh soils. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1406–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravit B, Ehrenfeld JG, Häggblom MM, Bartels M (2007) The effects of drainage and nitrogen enrichment on Phragmites australis, Spartina alterniflora, and their root-associated microbial communities. Wetlands 27:915–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reed HE, Martiny JB (2013) Microbial composition affects the functioning of estuarine sediments. The ISME J 7:868–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shepard CC, Crain CM, Beck MW (2011) The protective role of coastal marshes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 6:e27374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith B, Wilson JB (1996) A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt R. Simon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gregory P. Zogg
    • 1
  • Steven E. Travis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New EnglandBiddefordUSA
  2. 2.Department of EducationTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations