Assessing soil microbial respiration capacity using rDNA- or rRNA-based indices: a review

Journal of Soils and Sediments volume 16, pages2698–2708(2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding soil heterotrophic respiration in relation to microbial properties is not only fundamental to soil respiration modelling, prediction, and regulation through management, but also essential to interpreting microbial community dynamics from an ecologically meaningful perspective. This paper reviewed the recent advances in knowledge and proposed future directions for exploring the respiration-microbe relationships by means of rDNA- or rRNA-based indices (i.e. rDNA copies, rRNA copies, and rDNA- or rRNA-based community structures).

Materials and methods

We first elucidated the theoretical basis for using rDNA- or rRNA-based indices to probe into soil microbial respiration. Then, the published studies that simultaneously measured soil microbial respiration and the rDNA- or rRNA-based indices were synthesized, extracted, and analysed to further explore the respiration-microbe relationships. At last, the uncertainties and perspectives for establishing the respiration-microbe links were proposed and discussed.

Results and discussion

The rDNA- or rRNA-based indices are theoretically promising for pinpointing the relationships between soil heterotrophic respiration and microbial properties. Our systematic review suggested that the correlations between bacterial rDNA copies and microbial respiration are inconsistent across studies, while the fungal and archaeal rDNA (or ITS) copies showed moderately positive and negative correlations with soil microbial respiration, respectively. Bacterial 16S rDNA-based community structures were significantly correlated with soil microbial respiration in some studies, but not in some short-term situations. Although rRNA copies are widely used as the proxies of microbial activity, no significant correlations between rRNA copies and soil microbial respiration have been found in previous studies. Bacterial 16S rRNA-based community structures were correlated well with the short-term responses of soil microbial respiration to rewetting or labile carbon amendments and clearly outperformed other rDNA- or rRNA-based indices. As respiration-microbe relationships can be affected by many factors, such as soil physicochemical properties and even the analysis methods of microbial indices, the 69 previous studies included in this review actually provided limited information on them, and the aforementioned results still need to be further confirmed in future studies.

Conclusions and perspectives

Overall, the relationships between soil microbial respiration and rDNA- or rRNA-based indices are still far from being well established. Future research should be directed to systematically understanding the respiration-microbe links, with more attention to the fungus-, archaea- and RNA-related molecular indices. The relationships between microbial specific lineages and total respiration rates should be explored in future studies, and the effects of edaphic properties on the respiration-microbe relationships should also be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Amend AS, Martiny AC, Allison SD, Berlemont R, Goulden ML, Lu Y (2016) Microbial response to simulated global change is phylogenetically conserved and linked with functional potential. ISME J 10:109–118

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson IC, Parkin PI (2007) Detection of active soil fungi by RT-PCR amplification of precursor rRNA molecules. J Microbiol Methods 68:248–253

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andert J, Mumme J (2015) Impact of pyrolysis and hydrothermal biochar on gas-emitting activity of soil microorganisms and bacterial and archaeal community composition. Appl Soil Ecol 96:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldrian P, Kolarik M, Stursova M, Kopecky J, Valaskova V, Vetrovsky T, Zifcakova L, Snajdr J, Ridl J, Vlcek C, Voriskova J (2012) Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J 6:248–258

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard L, Mougel C, Maron PA, Nowak V, Leveque J, Henault C, Haichar FEZ, Berge O, Marol C, Balesdent J, Gibiat F, Lemanceau P, Ranjard L (2007) Dynamics and identification of soil microbial populations actively assimilating carbon from 13C-labelled wheat residue as estimated by DNA- and RNA-SIP techniques. Environ Microbiol 9:752–764

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnard RL, Osborne CA, Firestone MK (2013) Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. ISME J 7:2229–2241

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnard RL, Osborne CA, Firestone MK (2015) Changing precipitation pattern alters soil microbial community response to wet-up under a Mediterranean-type climate. ISME J 9:946–957

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bier RL, Bernhardt ES, Boot CM, Graham EB, Hall EK, Lennon JT, Nemergut DR, Osborne BB, Ruiz-González C, Schimel JP (2015) Linking microbial community structure and microbial processes: an empirical and conceptual overview. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:fiv113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2013) Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biol Biochem 67:192–211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blazewicz SJ, Barnard RL, Daly RA, Firestone MK (2013) Evaluating rRNA as an indicator of microbial activity in environmental communities: limitations and uses. ISME J 7:2061–2068

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blazewicz SJ, Schwartz E, Firestone MK (2014) Growth and death of bacteria and fungi underlie rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses from seasonally dried soil. Ecology 95:1162–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang CK, Gower ST (2004) A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? Glob Chang Biol 10:1756–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bru D, Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L (2008) Quantification of the detrimental effect of a single primer-template mismatch by real-time PCR using the 16S rRNA gene as an example. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1660–1663

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedetti A, Marchionni M, Mocali S, Fabiani A, Landi S, Santomassimo F, Pietrangeli B, Nuti MP, Miclaus N, Giovannetti M (2005) Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis and soil eubacterial communities iosis in experimental microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6719–6729

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Castro HF, Classen AT, Austin EE, Crawford KM, Schadt CW (2012) Development and validation of a citrate synthase directed quantitative PCR marker for soil bacterial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 61:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cesarz S, Fender AC, Beyer F, Valtanen K, Pfeiffer B, Gansert D, Hertel D, Polle A, Daniel R, Leuschner C, Scheu S (2013) Roots from beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) differentially affect soil microorganisms and carbon dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 61:23–32

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Che RX, Deng YC, Wang F, Wang WJ, ZH X, Wang YF, Cui XY (2015) 16S rRNA-based bacterial community structure is a sensitive indicator of soil respiration activity. J Soils Sediments 15:1987–1990

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Che RX, Wang F, Wang YF, Deng YC, Zhang J, Ma S, Cui XY (2016) A review on the methods for measuring total microbial activity in soils. Acta Entomol Sin 36:2103–2112

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cleveland CC, Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Townsend AR (2007) Increases in soil respiration following labile carbon additions linked to rapid shifts in soil microbial community composition. Biogeochemistry 82:229–240

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cleveland CC, Reed SC, Keller AB, Nemergut DR, O’Neill SP, Ostertag R, Vitousek PM (2014) Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis. Oecologia 174:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Graaff MA, Classen AT, Castro HF, Schadt CW (2010) Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and plant residue decomposition rates. New Phytol 188:1055–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, Wrighton KC, Zvenigorodsky N, Chen F, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J 4:642–647

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2012) Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter? Biogeochemistry 109:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD, Burke IC (2014) Is bacterial moisture niche a good predictor of shifts in community composition under long-term drought? Ecology 95:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goberna M, Garcia C, Insam H, Hernandez M, Verdu M (2012) Burning fire-prone mediterranean shrublands: immediate changes in soil microbial community structure and ecosystem functions. Microb Ecol 64:242–255

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham EB, Wieder WR, Leff JW, Weintraub SR, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC, Philippot L, Nemergut DR (2014) Do we need to understand microbial communities to predict ecosystem function? A comparison of statistical models of nitrogen cycling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 68:279–282

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Graharni EB et al (2016) Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00214

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR (1998) Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol 180:4765–4774

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Imparato V, Santos SS, Johansen A, Geisen S, Winding A (2016) Stimulation of bacteria and protists in rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated barley. Appl Soil Ecol 98:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kaplan H, Ratering S, Hanauer T, Felix-Henningsen P, Schnell S (2014) Impact of trace metal contamination and in situ remediation on microbial diversity and respiratory activity of heavily polluted Kastanozems. Biol Fertil Soils 50:735–744

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerkhof L, Kemp P (1999) Small ribosomal RNA content in marine Proteobacteria during non-steady-state growth. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30:253–260

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim TG, Jeong S-Y, Cho K-S (2014) Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6105–6113

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lahtinen SJ, Ahokoski H, Reinikainen JP, Gueimonde M, Nurmi J, Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ (2008) Degradation of 16S rRNA and attributes of viability of viable but nonculturable probiotic bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:693–698

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leff JW, Nemergut DR, Grandy AS, O’Neill SP, Wickings K, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC (2012) The effects of soil bacterial community structure on decomposition in a tropical rain forest. Ecosystems 15:284–298

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lennon JT, Jones SE (2011) Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:119–130

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Levy-Booth DJ, Campbell RG, Gulden RH, Hart MM, Powell JR, Klironomos JN, Pauls KP, Swanton CJ, Trevors JT, Dunfield KE (2007) Cycling of extracellular DNA in the soil environment. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2977–2991

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lewin B (2004) Genes VIII. Prentice Hall, Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li XF, You F, Bond PL, Huang LB (2015) Establishing microbial diversity and functions in weathered and neutral Cu-Pb-Zn tailings with native soil addition. Geoderma 247:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lima ACR, Brussaard L, Totola MR, Hoogmoed WB, de Goede RGM (2013) A functional evaluation of three indicator sets for assessing soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 64:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lindemann SR, Bernstein HC, Song H-S, Fredrickson JK, Fields MW, Shou W, Johnson DR, Beliaev AS (2016) Engineering microbial consortia for controllable outputs. ISME J. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.26

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liu YZ, Zhou T, Crowley D, Li LQ, Liu DW, Zheng JW, Yu XY, Pan GX, Hussain Q, Zhang XH, Zheng JF (2012) Decline in topsoil microbial quotient, fungal abundance and C utilization efficiency of rice paddies under heavy metal pollution across south China. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038858

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maila MP, Randima P, Surridge K, Dronen K, Cloete TE (2005) Evaluation of microbial diversity of different soil layers at a contaminated diesel site. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 55:39–44

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Martin JF, Barreiro C, Gonzalez-Lavado E, Barriuso M (2003) Ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins in corynebacteria. J Biotechnol 104:41–53

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martiny AC, Treseder K, Pusch G (2013) Phylogenetic conservatism of functional traits in microorganisms. ISME J 7:830–838

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Morrissey EM, McHugh TA, Preteska L, Hayer M, Dijkstra P, Hungate BA, Schwartz E (2015) Dynamics of extracellular DNA decomposition and bacterial community composition in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 86:42–49

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Morrissey EM, Mau RL, Schwartz E, Caporaso JG, Dijkstra P, van Gestel N, Koch BJ, Liu CM, Hayer M, McHugh TA (2016) Phylogenetic organization of bacterial activity. ISME J. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.28

    Google Scholar 

  49. Muttray AF, Mohn WW (1999) Quantitation of the population size and metabolic activity of a resin acid degrading bacterium in activated sludge using slot-blot hybridization to measure the rRNA:rDNA ratio. Microb Ecol 38:348–357

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nazaries L, Tottey W, Robinson L, Khachane A, Abu Al-Soud W, Sorensen S, Singh BK (2015) Shifts in the microbial community structure explain the response of soil respiration to land-use change but not to climate warming. Soil Biol Biochem 89:123–134

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nogueira MA, Albino UB, Brandao-Junior O, Braun G, Cruz MF, Dias BA, Duarte RTD, Gioppo NMR, Menna P, Orlandi JM, Raimam MP, Rampazo LGL, Santos MA, Silva MEZ, Vieira FP, Torezan JMD, Hungria M, Andrade G (2006) Promising indicators for assessment of agroecosystems alteration among natural, reforested and agricultural land use in southern Brazil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Noller HF (1984) Structure of ribosomal RNA. Annu Rev Biochem 53:119–162

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Noller HF (1991) Ribosomal RNA and translation. Annu Rev Biochem 60:191–227

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Orr CH, Stewart CJ, Leifert C, Cooper JM, Cummings SP (2015) Effect of crop management and sample year on abundance of soil bacterial communities in organic and conventional cropping systems. J Appl Microbiol 119:208–214

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Padmanabhan P, Padmanabhan S, DeRito C, Gray A, Gannon D, Snape JR, Tsai CS, Park W, Jeon C, Madsen EL (2003) Respiration of 13C-labeled substrates added to soil in the field and subsequent 16S rRNA gene analysis of 13C-labeled soil DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1614–1622

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Paz-Ferreiro J, Fu S (2016) Biological indices for soil quality evaluation: perspectives and limitations. Land Degrad Dev 27:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pell M, Stenström J, Granhall U (2005) Soil respiration. In: Bloem J, Hopkins DW, Benedetti A (eds) Microbial methods for assessing soil quality, 1st edn. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  58. Peltoniemi K, Laiho R, Juottonen H, Kiikkila O, Makiranta P, Minkkinen K, Pennanen T, Penttila T, Sarjala T, Tuittila ES, Tuomivirta T, Fritze H (2015) Microbial ecology in a future climate: effects of temperature and moisture on microbial communities of two boreal fens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:14

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pennanen T, Caul S, Daniell TJ, Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Wheatley RE (2004) Community-level responses of metabolically-active soil microorganisms to the quantity and quality of substrate inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 36:841–848

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Perez-Osorio AC, Williamson KS, Franklin MJ (2010) Heterogeneous rpoS and rhlR mRNA levels and 16S rRNA/rDNA (rRNA Gene) ratios within Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, sampled by laser capture microdissection. J Bacteriol 192:2991–3000

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pezzolla D, Marconi G, Turchetti B, Zadra C, Agnelli A, Veronesi F, Onofri A, Benucci GMN, Buzzini P, Albertini E, Gigliotti G (2015) Influence of exogenous organic matter on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiota in an agricultural soil: a multidisciplinary approach. Soil Biol Biochem 82:9–20

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Placella SA, Brodie EL, Firestone MK (2012) Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:10931–10936

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Probert ME, Dimes JP, Keating BA, Dalal RC, Strong WM (1998) APSIM’s water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems. Agric Sys 56:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Purahong W, Krueger D (2012) A better understanding of functional roles of fungi in the decomposition process: using precursor rRNA containing ITS regions as a marker for the active fungal community. Ann For Sci 69:659–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Qu XH, Wang JG (2008) Effect of amendments with different phenolic acids on soil microbial biomass, activity, and community diversity. Appl Soil Ecol 39:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/

  67. Ramirez KS, Craine JM, Fierer N (2012) Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Glob Chang Biol 18:1918–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ramirez-Villanueva DA, Bello-Lopez JM, Navarro-Noya YE, Luna-Guido M, Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Dendooven L (2015) Bacterial community structure in maize residue amended soil with contrasting management practices. Appl Soil Ecol 90:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rieder SR, Frey B (2013) Methyl-mercury affects microbial activity and biomass, bacterial community structure but rarely the fungal community structure. Soil Biol Biochem 64:164–173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ros M, Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez MT, Insam H (2006) Hydrolase activities, microbial biomass and bacterial community in a soil after long-term amendment with different composts. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3443–3452

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Schimel J, Schaeffer SM (2012) Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348

    Google Scholar 

  72. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Segev E, Smith Y, Ben-Yehuda S (2012) RNA dynamics in aging bacterial spores. Cell 148:139–149

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Stark S, Mannisto MK, Ganzert L, Tiirola M, Haggblom MM (2015) Grazing intensity in subarctic tundra affects the temperature adaptation of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 84:147–157

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tardy V, Spor A, Mathieu O, Leveque J, Terrat S, Plassart P, Regnier T, Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G, Bagella S, Lemanceau P, Ranjard L, Maron PA (2015) Shifts in microbial diversity through land use intensity as drivers of carbon mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 90:204–213

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Todd-Brown KEO, Randerson JT, Post WM, Hoffman FM, Tarnocai C, Schuur EAG, Allison SD (2013) Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations. Biogeosciences 10:1717–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Vetrovsky T, Baldrian P (2013) The variability of the 16S rRNA Gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057923

    Google Scholar 

  78. Vogel C, Babin D, Pronk GJ, Heister K, Smalla K, Kogel-Knabner I (2014) Establishment of macro-aggregates and organic matter turnover by microbial communities in long-term incubated artificial soils. Soil Biol Biochem 79:57–67

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wakelin SA, Chu GX, Broos K, Clarke KR, Liang YC, McLaughlin MJ (2010) Structural and functional response of soil microbiota to addition of plant substrate are moderated by soil Cu levels. Biol Fertil Soils 46:333–342

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang WJ, Dalal RC, Moody PW, Smith CJ (2003) Relationships of soil respiration to microbial biomass, substrate availability and clay content. Soil Biol Biochem 35:273–284

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang YF, Hao YB, Cui XY, Zhao HT, CY X, Zhou XQ, ZH X (2014a) Responses of soil respiration and its components to drought stress. J Soils Sediments 14:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang QK, Wang SL, He TX, Liu L, JB W (2014b) Response of organic carbon mineralization and microbial community to leaf litter and nutrient additions in subtropical forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 71:13–20

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang QK, Wang YP, Wang SL, He TX, Liu L (2014c) Fresh carbon and nitrogen inputs alter organic carbon mineralization and microbial community in forest deep soil layers. Soil Biol Biochem 72:145–151

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Widder S et al (2016) Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics. ISME J. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.45

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wittmann HG (1983) Architecture of prokaryotic ribosomes. Annu Rev Biochem 52:35–65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Woese CR, Fox GE (1977) Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:5088–5090

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML (1990) Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:4576–4579

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Xue D, Yao HY, Huang CY (2006) Microbial biomass, N mineralization and nitrification, enzyme activities, and microbial community diversity in tea orchard soils. Plant Soil 288:319–331

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Yao S, Merwin IA, Bird GW, Abawi GS, Thies JE (2005) Orchard floor management practices that maintain vegetative or biomass groundcover stimulate soil microbial activity and alter soil microbial community composition. Plant Soil 271:377–389

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Yuste JC, Baldocchi DD, Gershenson A, Goldstein A, Misson L, Wong S (2007) Microbial soil respiration and its dependency on carbon inputs, soil temperature and moisture. Glob Chang Biol 13:2018–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Yuste JC, Penuelas J, Estiarte M, Garcia-Mas J, Mattana S, Ogaya R, Pujol M, Sardans J (2011) Drought-resistant fungi control soil organic matter decomposition and its response to temperature. Glob Chang Biol 17:1475–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yuste JC, Fernandez-Gonzalez AJ, Fernandez-Lopez M, Ogaya R, Penuelas J, Lloret F (2014) Functional diversification within bacterial lineages promotes wide functional overlapping between taxonomic groups in a Mediterranean forest soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang J, Wang F, Che RX, Wang P, Liu HK, Ji BM, Cui XY (2016) Precipitation shapes communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Tibetan alpine steppe. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep23488

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zifcakova L, Vetrovsky T, Howe A, Baldrian P (2016) Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter. Environ Microbiol 18:288–301

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB15010201), National Natural Science Foundations of China (41230750 and 31570518), and National Basic Research Program (2013CB956000). Rongxiao Che also received the Joint PhD Scholarship under the agreement between Griffith University and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. We would like to express our sincere thanks to Damien Finn, Yongcui Deng, Li Tang, Qiushi Ning, and Linfeng Li for their insightful and constructive comments on improving the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Rongxiao Che, Jing Zhang, Juan Tao, Fang Wang, Yanfen Wang & Xiaoyong Cui

  2. Environmental Futures Research Institute and School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia

    Rongxiao Che, Weijin Wang, Thi Thu Nhan Nguyen & Zhihong Xu

  3. Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research/Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Rongxiao Che

  4. Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane, Queensland, 4068, Australia

    Weijin Wang

  5. Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia

    Thi Thu Nhan Nguyen

  6. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia

    Juan Tao

Authors
  1. Rongxiao Che
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weijin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thi Thu Nhan Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juan Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yanfen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhihong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaoyong Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhihong Xu or Xiaoyong Cui.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hong Jie Di

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 238 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Che, R., Wang, W., Zhang, J. et al. Assessing soil microbial respiration capacity using rDNA- or rRNA-based indices: a review. J Soils Sediments 16, 2698–2708 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1563-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Soil microorganism
  • Carbon cycle
  • Microbial respiration
  • rRNA
  • Microbial activity