Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing urban soils in New York City: profile properties and bacterial communities

  • Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The influence of human activities on the development and functioning of urban soils and their profile characteristics is still inadequately understood. Microbial communities can change due to anthropogenic disturbances and it is unclear how they exist along urban soil profiles. This study investigates the dynamic soil properties (DSPs) and the bacterial communities along the profiles of urban soils in New York City (NYC) with varying degree of human disturbances.

Materials and methods

Eleven pedons were investigated across NYC as well as one control soil in a nearby non-urban area. Six soils are formed in naturally deposited materials (ND) and five in human-altered and human-transported materials (HAHT). For each soil, the profile was described and each horizon was sampled to assess DSPs and the bacterial community composition and diversity.

Results and discussion

The development and the DSPs of NYC soils are influenced by the incorporation of HAHT materials and atmospheric deposits. The most abundant bacterial taxa observed in the NYC soils are also present in most natural and urban soils worldwide. The bacterial diversity was lower in some soils formed in ND materials, in which the contribution of low-abundance taxa was more restricted. Some differences in bacterial community composition separated the soils formed in ND materials and in dredged sediments from the soils formed in high artifact fill and serpentinite till. Changes in bacterial community composition between soil horizons were more noticeable in urban soils formed in ND materials than in those formed in HAHT materials which display less differentiated profiles and in the non-urban highly weathered soil.

Conclusions

The bacterial diversity is not linked to the degree of disturbance of the urban soils but the variations in community composition between pedons and along soil profiles could be the result of changes in soil development and properties related to human activities and should be consistently characterized in urban soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNOR (1995) Soil quality—determination of carbonate content—volumetric method, NF ISO 10693. Association Française de Normalisation ed, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun B, Böckelmann U, Grohmann E, Szewzyk U (2006) Polyphasic characterization of the bacterial community in an urban soil profile with in situ and culture-dependent methods. Appl Soil Ecol 31:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Meth 7:335–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Chiu C-H, Jost L (2010) Phylogenetic diversity measures based on hill numbers. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3599–3609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Paltseva A, Li I, et al. (2015) Trace metal contamination in New York City garden soils. Soil Sci 180:167–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Kimpe CR, Morel JL (2000) Urban soil management: a growing concern. Soil Sci 165:31–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA Gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(7):5069–5072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N (2012) Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 50:58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Khalil H, Schwartz C, Elhamiani O, Kubiniok J, Morel JL, Boularbah A (2008) Contribution of technic materials to the mobile fraction of metals in urban soils in Marrakech (Morocco. J Soils Sediments 8:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, et al. (2012) Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. P Natl Acad Sci 109:21390–21395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW, Klute A (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis—part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, pp 383–411

  • Grice EA, Segre JA (2012) The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu Rev Genomics Human Genet 13:151–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RI, Thomson BC, James P, Bell T, Bailey MJ, Whiteley AS (2011) The bacterial biogeography of British soils. Environ Microbiol 13:1642–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez F, Spor A, Breuil M-C, et al. (2012) Distribution of bacteria and nitrogen-cycling microbial communities along constructed Technosol depth-profiles. J Hazard Mater 231–232:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansel CM, Fendorf S, Jardine PM, Francis CA (2008) Changes in bacterial and archaeal community structure and functional diversity along a geochemically variable soil profile. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1620–1633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard JL, Ryzewski K, Dubay BR, Killion TW (2015) Artifact preservation and post-depositional site-formation processes in an urban setting: a geoarchaeological study of a nineteenth century neighborhood in Detroit, Michigan, USA. J Archaeol Sci 53:178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse SM, Ye Y, Zhou Y, Fodor AA (2012) A core human microbiome as viewed through 16S rRNA sequence clusters. PLoS One 7:e34242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imperato M, Adamo P, Naimo D, Arienzo M, Stanzione D, Violante P (2003) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy. Environ Pollut 124:247–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PH (2006) Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1719–1728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji M, van Dorst J, Bissett A, Brown MV, Palmer AS, Snape I, Siciliano SD, Ferrari BC (2015) Microbial diversity at Mitchell Peninsula, Eastern Antarctica: a potential biodiversity “hotspot. Polar Biol 39:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Bihan M, Methé BA (2013) Analyses of the stability and core taxonomic memberships of the human microbiome. PLoS One 8:e63139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Kandeler E (2005) Biochemical characterization of urban soil profiles from Stuttgart, Germany. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1373–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh JL (1969) Bray and Morgan soil test extractants modified for testing acid soils from different parent materials. Agron J 61:259–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michel HM, Williams MA (2011) Soil habitat and horizon properties impact bacterial diversity and composition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1440–1448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JC, McCann K, de Ruiter PC (2005) Modeling trophic pathways, nutrient cycling, and dynamic stability in soils. Pedobiologia 49:499–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morel JL, Chenu C, Lorenz K (2014) Ecosystem services provided by soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas (SUITMAs. J Soils Sediments 15:1659–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehls T, Shaw RK (2010) Black carbon in soils: relevance, analysis, distribution. Soil Surv Horiz 51:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehls T, Rokia S, Mekiffer B, Schwartz C, Wessolek G (2013) Contribution of bricks to urban soil properties. J Soils Sediments 13:575–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • New York City Soil Survey Staff (2005) New York City reconnaissance soil survey. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Staten Island, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (2005) Concentrations of selected analytes in rural New York state surface soils: a summary report on the statewide rural surface soil survey. Available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/remediation_hudson_pdf/appendixde.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2016

  • Piotrowska-Długosz A, Charzyński P (2015) The impact of the soil sealing degree on microbial biomass, enzymatic activity, and physicochemical properties in the Ekranic Technosols of Toruń (Poland). J Soils Sediments 15:47–59

  • Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Yesilonis ID, Groffman PM, Schwarz K (2010) Chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of urban soils. In: Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Volder A (eds) Urban ecosystem ecology, agronomy monograph 55. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 119–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Dombos M, et al. (2015) A global comparison of surface soil characteristics across five cities: a test of the urban ecosystem convergence hypothesis. Soil Sci 180:136–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prokof’eva TV, Poputnikov VO (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of soils in the Pokrovskoe-Streshnevo park (Moscow) and adjacent residential areas. Eurasian Soil Sci 43:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez KS, Leff JW, Barberán A, et al. (2014) Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc R Soc B 281:20141988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese AT, Savage A, Youngsteadt E et al (2015) Urban stress is associated with variation in microbial species composition—but not richness—in Manhattan. ISME J 1–10

  • Ren G, Ren W, Teng Y, Li Z (2015) Evident bacterial community changes but only slight degradation when polluted with pyrene in a red soil. Front Microbiol 6:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleuss U, Wu Q, Blume H-P (1998) Variability of soils in urban and periurban areas in northern Germany. Catena 33:255–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocky DA, Benham EC, Soil Survey Staff (2012) Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RK, Hernandez L, Levin M, Muñiz E (2016) Promoting soil science in the urban environment—partnerships in New York City, NY, USA. J Soils Sediments 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1456-8

  • Subrahmanyam G, Shen J-P, Liu Y-R, et al. (2016) Effect of long-term industrial waste effluent pollution on soil enzyme activities and bacterial community composition. Environ Monit Assess 188:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Will C, Thürmer A, Wollherr A, et al. (2010) Horizon-specific bacterial community composition of German grassland soils, as revealed by pyrosequencing-based analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6751–6759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H-J, Li S, Su J-Q, et al. (2013) Does urbanization shape bacterial community composition in urban park soils? A case study in 16 representative Chinese cities based on the pyrosequencing method. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Li F, Yang Q, et al. (2013) The influence of different types of urban land use on soil microbial biomass and functional diversity in Beijing, China. Soil Use Manage 29:230–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the USDA-NRCS soil scientists (Lisa Krall, Edwin Muñiz, Fred Schoenagel, Marissa Theve, Olga Vargas, and Ron Taylor) for their help in describing and sampling the soils. They also wish to thank Zulema García-Blanco for mapping the sampling sites and all the undergraduate and graduate students of Brooklyn College and the students of Midwood High School for their help to collect and analyze the soil samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongqi Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by USDA-NRCS (Contract Number: 68-7482-13-524).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Stefan Norra

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 768 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huot, H., Joyner, J., Córdoba, A. et al. Characterizing urban soils in New York City: profile properties and bacterial communities. J Soils Sediments 17, 393–407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1552-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1552-9

Keywords

Navigation