Effect of copper and zinc on microbial tolerance to triclosan in two soil types
Sewage sludge and biosolid application to land is a common approach to fertilise soils, but sewage-derived contaminants like the antimicrobial agent triclosan, and heavy metals zinc and copper, are known to affect soil microbial communities. In this study, the tolerance to triclosan was examined for soil microbial communities chronically pre-exposed to one of two heavy metals (Cu or Zn) and the antimicrobial triclosan. This was investigated in two different soil types.
Materials and methods
The impacts of chronic exposure of copper, zinc and triclosan as individual compounds or in mixtures on soil microbial communities were assessed in soils collected from two sites. The first was a Horotiu sandy loam with ample carbon and nitrogen levels and the second was a Templeton silt loam with very low carbon and nitrogen levels. The end points used to characterise the response of the soil microbial community were biomass, metabolic activity and pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) to triclosan (using Biolog EcoPlates). In addition, metabolic activities for individual substrates were examined and those that significantly changed with the applied treatments were identified.
Results and discussion
Exposure to mixtures of both triclosan and copper in the Horotiu sandy loam reduced microbial biomass, increased metabolic activity and reduced microbial tolerance to triclosan. The decrease in soil microbial tolerance correlated with an increased metabolic activity for N-acetyl-d-glucosamine providing a potential link between triclosan exposure and nitrogen mineralisation. Exposure to both triclosan and high zinc levels decreased microbial biomass in the Horotiu sandy loam but did not have an effect on microbial tolerance to triclosan. In the finer-textured and less fertile Templeton soil, microbial tolerance to triclosan and the microbial biomass were not impacted by copper/triclosan or zinc/triclosan mixtures.
Mixture effects could become a cause for concern when soil microbial communities are exposed to triclosan in fertile soils with copper concentrations in excess of 50 mg kg−1 and could be especially important in the more coarsely textured soils. Current regulations for soil contaminants only consider the risk and effects of single contaminants. Greater protection of soil resources could result from considering mixture effects and soil types.
KeywordsCopper Microbial tolerance Mixtures Soil Triclosan Zinc
We thank the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) for funding, Alexandra McGill, Jacqui van der Waals, Marie Dennis and Ruth Falshaw for their valued contributions and Rod Ball and Mark Kimberly for providing statistical support to this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bååth E, Díaz-Raviña M, Frostegård Å, Campbell CD (1998) Effect of metal-rich sludge amendments on the soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:238–245Google Scholar
- Cole EC, Addison RM, Rubino JR, Leese KE, Dulaney PD, Newell MS, Wilkins J, Gaber DJ, Wineinger T, Criger DA (2003) Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers. J Appl Microbiol 95:664–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Department of Environment UK (1989) Code of practice for the agricultural use of sewage sludgeGoogle Scholar
- European Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (2010) Opinion on triclosan—antimicrobial resistance. doi: 10:10.2772/11162Google Scholar
- Hewitt AE (1998) New Zealand soil classification. Landcare research science series 1. Manaaki Whenua. Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Jain PK, Ramachandran S, Shukla V, Bhakuni D, Verma SK (2009) Characterization of metal and antibiotic resistance in a bacterial population isolated from a copper mining industry. Int J Integr Biol 6:57–61Google Scholar
- Matsumura N, Ishibashi H, Hirano M, Nagao Y, Watanabe N, Shiratsuchi H, Kai T, Nishimura T, Kashiwagi A, Arizono K (2005) Effects of nonylphenol and triclosan on production of plasma vitellogenin and testosterone in male South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Biol Pharm Bull 28:1748–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- New Zealand Water and Wastes Association (2003) Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Northcott GL (2014) Disappearance and transformation of the antimicrobial chemical triclosan in 2 New Zealand soils. In: New Zealand Society of Soil Science Conference “Soil Science for Future Generations”, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, 1-4 December 2014Google Scholar
- Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) Soil chemical methods: Australasia Australian soil and land survey handbooks, 3. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt H (2005) The effects of veterinary antibiotics on soil microbial communities. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, ISBN 90-8559-056-6Google Scholar
- Sparling GP, Lilburne L, Vojvodic-Vukovic M (2008) Provisional targets for soil quality indicators in New Zealand. https://sindi.landcareresearch.co.nz/. Landcare Research Science Series no. 34. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Speir T, Northcott GL (2006) Organic residues in sewage biosolids: summary of the New Zealand CDRP Project results. Paper presented at the Australian Water Association. Biosolids Specialty Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2-8 June 2006Google Scholar
- Tkachenko O, Shepard J, Aris VM, Joy A, Bello A, Londono I, Marku J, Soteropoulos P, Peteroy-Kelly MA (2007) A triclosan-ciprofloxacin cross-resistant mutant strain of Staphylococcus aureus displays an alteration in the expression of several cell membrane structural and functional genes. Res Microbiol 158:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar