Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 1267–1278 | Cite as

Arsenic and metals mobility in soils impacted by tailings at Zimapán, México

  • María Aurora ArmientaEmail author
  • Violeta Mugica
  • Isabel Reséndiz
  • Mirella Gutierrez Arzaluz
Soil Pollution and Remediation

Abstract

Purpose

Mining wastes may cause important environmental impacts in soil, water, and air due to their high metals and arsenic contents. The aim of this work was the assessment of the mobility of arsenic and several heavy metals in soils located near different types of tailing heaps in the town of Zimapán, México.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty soil samples were collected nearby to three tailing heaps, one oxidized presenting a red color (RT), and two with gray wastes (OSM and NSM) but with different age, during the dry and rainy seasons at the surface and to 40 cm depth, as well as to different distances from the deposits. Arsenic, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, V, and Zn total concentrations were determined; in addition, geochemical phase distribution of As, Cu, Mn, and Zn in selected samples was determined by sequential extraction. Concentrations were measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma. To interpret the results, statistical analyses were performed.

Results and discussion

All samples presented high As concentrations reaching more than 50,000 mg kg−1 close to OSM tailings, although the highest concentrations in the available fractions were measured in NSM impacted soils. Arsenic and metals concentrations exceeded the screening limits recommended for industrial sites. In samples influenced by OSM tailings, most of the elements analyzed were in the residual fraction, whereas in NSM and RT they were mostly in the organic and sulfide fractions and in the Fe and Mn oxides fractions, respectively. Larger concentrations of As and metals than those allowed by the screening values in Canada and the Netherlands were measured in the residential area representing a health threat for the inhabitants and the environment.

Conclusions

Acid mine drainage, water, and wind erosion of tailings have polluted nearby soils. Higher concentrations of As and metals were measured during the rainy season in gray tailings impacted soils and during the dry season in red tailings, showing both deposit types’ different mobility. Elements fractionation in soils depends mainly on tailings characteristics. Low metals and As proportions were found in the fraction with the highest mobility. Metals and arsenic are more stable in soils impacted by gray tailings, mainly in the organic and sulfides and residual fractions, while in RT, most are linked to Fe and Mn oxyhydroxides. Polluted soils in residential areas constitute a health hazard. Remedial actions must be taken to stop the population exposure.

Keywords

México Mining wastes Sequential extraction Soil pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge A. Aguayo, N. Ceniceros, and O. Cruz for their participation in arsenic determinations, and to Adolfo Hernández for drawing the maps. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Archer MJG, Caldwell RA (2004) Response of six Australian plant species to heavy metal contamination at an abandoned mine site. Water Air Soil Pollut 157:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arenas-Lago D, Andrade ML, Lago-Vila M, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Vega FA (2014) Sequential extraction of heavy metals in soils from a copper mine: distribution in geochemical fractions. Geoderma 230–231:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armienta MA, Rodriguez R, Aguayo A, Ceniceros N, Villaseñor G (1997) Arsenic contamination of groundwater at Zimapán, México. Hydrogeol J 5:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armienta MA, Villaseñor G, Rodriguez R, Ongley LK, Mango H (2001) The role of arsenic-bearing rocks in groundwater pollution at Zimapán Valley, México. Environ Geol 40:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armienta MA, Villaseñor G, Cruz O, Ceniceros N, Aguayo A, Morton O (2012) Geochemical processes and mobilization of toxic metals and metalloids in an As-rich metal waste pile in Zimapán, Central Mexico. Appl Geochem 27:2225–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bačeva K, Stafilov T, Šajn R, Tănăselia C, Makreski P (2014) Distribution of chemical elements in soils and stream sediments in the area of abandoned Sb-As-Tl Allchar mine, Republic of Macedonia. J Geochem Explor 133:77–89Google Scholar
  7. Barrutia O, Artetxe U, Hernández A, Olano JM, García-Plazaola JI, Garbisu C, Becerril JM (2011) Native plant communities in an abandoned Pb-Zn mining area of Northern Spain: implications for phytoremediation and germplasm preservation. Int J Phytoremediation 13:256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bech J, Poschenrieder C, Llugany M, Barceló J, Tumea P, Tobias FJ, Barranzuela JL, Vásquez ER (1997) Arsenic and heavy metal contamination of soil and vegetation around a copper mine in Northern Peru. Sci Total Environ 203:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bech J, Roca N, Barceló J, Duran P, Tume P, Poschenrieder C (2012) Soil and plant contamination by lead mining in Bellmunt (Western Mediterranean Area). J Geochem Explor 113:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blowes DW, Jambor JL, Hanton-Fog CJ, Lortie L, Gould WD (1998) Geochemical, mineralogical and microbiological characterization of a sulphide-bearing carbonate-rich gold-mine tailings impoundment, Joutel, Québec. Appl Geochem 13:687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowell RJ (1994) Sorption of arsenic by iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in soils. Appl Geochem 9:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cai Y, Cabrera JC, Georgiadis M, Jayachandran K (2002) Assessment of arsenic mobility in the soils of some golf courses in South Florida. Sci Total Environ 291:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CSQG. Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (2007) Revised and edited version of 1999. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlon C (ed) (2007) Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, EUR 22805-EN. 306 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Cortés-Jiménez EV, Mugica-Álvarez V, González-Chávez MC A, Carrillo- González R, Martínez Gordillo M, Vaca Mier M (2013) Natural revegetation of alkaline mailing heaps at Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico. Int J Phytoremediation 15:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dold B (2003) Speciation of the most soluble phases in a sequential extraction procedure adapted for geochemical studies of copper sulfide mine waste. J Geochem Explor 74:3–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dold B, Fontboté L (2001) Element cycling and secondary mineralogy in porphyri copper tailings as a function of climate, primary mineralogy and ore processing. J Geochem Explor 80:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dzombak DA, Morel FM (1990) Surface complexation modeling (hydrous ferric oxide). Wiley Interscience Publications, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Espinosa E, Armienta MA (2007) Mobility and fractionation of Fe, Pb and Zn in river sediments of a silver and base metals (Cu, Pb and Zn) mining area: Taxco, México. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 42:1391–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Espinosa E, Armienta MA, Cruz O, Aguayo A, Ceniceros N (2009) Geochemical distribution of arsenic, cadmium, lead and zinc in river sediments affected by tailings in Zimapán, an historical polymetallic mining zone of México. Environ Geol 58:1467–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. García G, Querol F (1991) Description of some deposits in the Zimapan District, Hidalgo. In: Salas GP (ed) Economic geology, Mexico, the geology of North America. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 295–313Google Scholar
  22. García A, Armienta MA, Cruz O (2001) Sources, distribution and fate of arsenic along the Toliman river, Zimapán, México. In: Acreman MC (ed) Hydro-ecology: linking hydrology and aquatic ecology. IAHS publ. 266, Wallingford, pp 57-64Google Scholar
  23. Garcia G, Peña JM, Manteca JI (2008) Zn mobility and geochemistry in surface sulfide mining soils from SE Spain. Environ Res 106:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González-Corrochano B, Esbrí JM, Alonso-Azcárate J, Martínez-Coronado A, Jurado V, Higuera P (2014) Environmental geochemistry of a highly polluted area: the La Union Pb–Zn mine (Castilla-La Mancha region, Spain). J Geochem Explor 144(Part B):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchinson TC, Whitby LM (1974) Heavy-metal pollution in the Sudbury mining and smelting region of Canada, I. Soil and vegetation contamination by nickel, copper, and other metals. Environ Conserv 1:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. INEGI (1994) Zimapán de Reyes, estado de Hidalgo, Cuaderno Estadístico Municipal. Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática, AguascalientesGoogle Scholar
  27. INEGI (2010) Marco Geoestadístico 2010, Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e. Informática, AguascalientesGoogle Scholar
  28. Jambor JL (2003) Mine-waste mineralogy and mineralogical perspectives of acid-base accounting. In: Jambor JL, Blowes DW, Ritchie AIM (eds) Environmental aspects of mine wastes. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Ottawa, pp 117–145Google Scholar
  29. LaBerge CG, Ford PK, Engineers LLC, Freeman R, Wiman A (2008). Risk management criteria determination using in vitro bioaccessibility results for arsenic at Saginaw Hill mining district, remediation of abandoned mine lands, Tucson, Arizona, 2–3 October, 2008 (abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Marabottini R, Stazi SR, Papp R, Grego S, Moscatelli MC (2013) Mobility and distribution of arsenic in contaminated mine soils and its effects on the microbial pool. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 96:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Méndez M, Armienta MA (2003) Arsenic phase distribution in Zimapán mine tailings, Mexico. Geofis Int 42:131–140Google Scholar
  32. Morales NA, Martínez D, García-Meza JV, Labastida I, Armienta MA, Razo I, Lara RH (2015) Total and bioaccessible arsenic and lead in soils impacted by mining exploitation of iron-oxide-rich ore deposit at Cerro de Mercado, Durango Mexico. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3617-7 Google Scholar
  33. Ngure V, Davies T, Kinuthia G, Sitati N, Shisia S, Oyoo-Okoth E (2014) Concentration levels of potentially harmful elements from gold mining in Lake Victoria Region, Kenya: environmental and health implications. J Geochem Explor 144:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ongley LK, Armienta MA, Heggeman K, Lathrop A, Mango H, Miller W, Pickelner S (2001) Arsenic removal from contaminated water by the Soyatal Formation, Zimapán Mining District, Mexico—a potential low-cost low-tech remediation system. Geochem Expl Environ Anal 1:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ongley LK, Sherman L, Armienta A, Concilio A, Ferguson-Salinas C (2007) Arsenic in the soils of Zimapán, Mexico. Environ Pollut 145:793–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osher LJ, Leclerca L, Wiersmab GB, Hessc CT, Guiseppec VE (2006) Heavy metal contamination from historic mining in upland soil and estuarine sediments of Egypt Bay, Maine, USA. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci 70:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patinha C, Ferreira da Silva E, Cardoso FE (2004) Mobilization of arsenic at the Talhadas old mining area—central Portugal. J Geochem Explor 84:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramos AYR, Siebe C (2007) Weathering of sulphide minerals and trace element speciation in tailings of various ages in the Guanajuato mining district, Mexico. Catena 71:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Razo I, Carrizales L, Castro J, Díaz-Barriga F, Monroy M (2004) Arsenic and heavy metal pollution of soil, water and sediments in a semi-arid climate mining area in Mexico. Water Air Soil Pollut 152:129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reza MA, Roshani RP, Cohen DR, Emami A, Akbar A, Bafghi D, Khodaian GZ (2014) Metal speciation in agricultural soils adjacent to the Irankuh Pb-Zn mining area in Iran. J African Earth Sci 101:186–193Google Scholar
  41. Rodriguez R, Ramos JA, Armienta MA (2004) Groundwater arsenic variations: the role of local geology and rainfall. Appl Geochem 19:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez L, Ruiz E, Alonso-Azcárate J, Rincón J (2009) Heavy metal distribution and chemical speciation in tailings and soils around a Pb–Zn mine in Spain. J Environ Manag 90:1106–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romero FM, Armienta MA, Carrillo-Chavez A (2004) Arsenic sorption by carbonate-rich aquifer material, a control on arsenic mobility at Zimapán, Mexico. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Romero FM, Armienta MA, Villaseñor G, González JL (2006) Mineralogical constraints on the mobility of arsenic in tailings from Zimapán, Hidalgo, Mexico. Int J Environ Pollut 26:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salomons W (1995) Environmental impact of metals derived from mining activities: processes, predictions, preventions. J Geochem Explor 52:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seal RR, Hammarstrom JM (2003) Geoenvironmental models of mineral deposits: examples from massive sulfide and gold deposits. In: Jambor JL, Blowes DW, Ritchie AIM (eds) Environmental aspects of mine wastes. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Ottawa, pp 11–50Google Scholar
  47. Simons FS, Mapes-Vazquez E (1956) Geology and ore deposits of the Zimapán mining district, State of Hidalgo, Mexico. USGS Prof Pap 284, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Sracek O, Armienta MA, Rodríguez R, Villaseñor G (2010) Discrimination between diffuse and point sources of arsenic at Zimapán, Hidalgo state, Mexico. J Environ Monit 12:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stefanowicz AM, Woch MW, Kapusta P (2014) Inconspicuous waste heaps left by historical Zn–Pb mining are hot spots of soil contamination. Geoderma 235–236:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Talavera MO, Yta M, Moreno TO, Dótor AA, Flores MN, Duarte GC (2005) Mineralogy and geochemistry of sulfide-bearing tailings from silver mines in the Taxco Mexico area to evaluate their potential environmental impact. Geofis Int 44:49–64Google Scholar
  51. Teng Y, Wu J, Lu S, Wang Y, Jiao X, Song L (2014) Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: a review. Environ Int 69:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teršič T, Gosar M, Šajn R (2009) Impact of mining activities on soils and sediments at the historical mining area in Podljubelj, NW Slovenia. J Geochem Explor 100:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tessier A, Campbell PG, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ure A, Quevauviller P, Muntau H, Griepink B (1993) Speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments. An account of the improvement and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the Commission of the European Communities. Int J Environ Anal Chem 51:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1995) Method 9045 C. Soil and waste pH. U.S. Gov. print Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  56. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Method 3051A. Microwave assisted acid dissolution of sediments, sludge, soils, and oils. U.S. Gov. print Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Villaseñor CMG, Petersen EU, Avendaño-Cano S, Gómez-Caballero JA, Sousa J, Reyes-Salas AM (1996) Minerales del grupo de la tetrahedrita en las minas de Lomo de Toro y Las animas, Zimapán, Hidalgo. Actas INAGEQ 2:129–134Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Aurora Armienta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Violeta Mugica
    • 2
  • Isabel Reséndiz
    • 3
  • Mirella Gutierrez Arzaluz
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de GeofísicaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, AzcapotzalcoMexicoMéxico
  3. 3.Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT)MéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations