Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of low energy-consuming biochars in combination with nitrate fertilizer on soil acidity amelioration and maize growth

  • Biochar for a Sustainable Environment
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the ameliorative effects of crop straw biochars either alone or in combination with nitrate fertilizer on soil acidity and maize growth.

Materials and methods

Low energy-consuming biochars were prepared from canola and peanut straws at 400 °C for 2 h. Incubation experiment was conducted to determine application rate of biochars. Afterward, maize crop was grown in pots for 85 days to investigate the effects of 1 % biochars combined with nitrate fertilizer on soil pH, exchangeable acidity, and maize growth in an Ultisol collected from Guangdong Province, China.

Results and discussion

Application of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 % either canola straw biochar (CSB) or peanut straw biochar (PSB) increased soil pH by 0.15, 0.27, 0.34, and 0.30, 0.58, 0.83 U, respectively, after 65-day incubation. Soil pH was increased by 0.49, 0.72, 0.78, and 0.88 U when 1 % CSB or PSB was applied in combination with 100 and 200 mg N/kg of nitrate, respectively, after maize harvest in greenhouse pot experiment. These low-cost biochars when applied alone or in combination with nitrate not only reduced soil exchangeable acidity, but also increased Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, and base saturation degree of the soil. A total of 49.91 and 80.58 % decreases in exchangeable acidity were observed when 1 % CSB and PSB were incubated with the soil for 65 days, compared to pot experiment where 71.35, 78.64, 80.2, and 81.77 % reductions of exchangeable acidity were observed when 1 % CSB and PSB were applied in combination with 100 and 200 mg N/kg of nitrate, respectively. The higher contents of base cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+) in biochars also influenced the plant growth. The higher biomass in CSB-treated pots was attributed to the higher K content compared to PSB. The higher percent reduction in exchangeable Al3+ by applying 1 % CSB combined with 200 mg N/kg of nitrate consistently produced maximum biomass (129.65 g/pot) compared to 100 mg N/kg of nitrate and 1 % PSB combined with 100 and 200 mg N/kg of nitrate. The exchangeable Al3+ mainly responsible for exchangeable acidity was decreased with the application of biochars and nitrate fertilizer. A highly significant negative relationship was observed between soil exchangeable Al3+ and plant biomass (r 2 = 0.88, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The biochars in combination with nitrate fertilizer are cost-effective options to effectively reduce soil acidity and improve crop growth on sustainable basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Awad YM, Blagodatskaya E, Ok YS, Kuzyakov Y (2013) Effects of polyacrylamide, biopolymer and biochar on the decomposition of 14C-labelled maize residues and on their stabilization in soil aggregates. Eur J Soil Sci 64:488–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clough TJ, Condron LM (2010) Biochar and the nitrogen cycle: Introduction. J Environ Qual 39:1218–1223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin J, Steiner C, Harris K, Das K, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gijsman AJ (1990) Rhizosphere pH along different root zones of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), as affected by source of nitrogen. Plant Soil 124:161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV, Amien I (1989) Aluminum detoxification with green manures. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20:1499–1511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Follett RF, Stewart B, Kimble JM (2007) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Sci 172:943–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landau S, Everitt B (2004) A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Chapman and Hall, CRC Boca Raton

  • Lang T, Jensen AD, Jensen PA (2005) Retention of organic elements during solid fuel pyrolysis with emphasis on the peculiar behavior of nitrogen. Energ Fuel 19:1631–1643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JY, Xu RK, Zhang H (2012) Iron oxides serve as natural anti-acidification agents in highly weathered soils. J Soils Sediments 12:876–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masud MM, Li JY, Xu RK (2014a) Use of alkaline slag and crop residue biochars to promote base saturation and reduce acidity of an acidic Ultisol. Pedosphere 24:791–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masud M, Guo D, Li JY, Xu RK (2014b) Hydroxyl release by maize (Zea mays L.) roots under acidic conditions due to nitrate absorption and its potential to ameliorate an acidic Ultisol. J Soils Sediments 14:845–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez A, Terradillos M, Gascó G (2013) Physicochemical and agronomic properties of biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysed at different temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 102:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naramabuye F, Haynes RJ (2006) Effect of organic amendments on soil pH and Al solubility and use of laboratory indices to predict their liming effect. Soil Sci 171:754–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MA (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis: mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Ye Y, Wang C, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: Characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Till Res 112:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Chen B, Hu D (2013) Effective alleviation of aluminum phytotoxicity by manure-derived biochar. Environ Sci Technol 47:2737–2745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z, Tang C, Raphael C, Bowden J (2000) Understanding subsoil acidification: effect of nitrogen transformation and nitrate leaching. Soil Res 38:837–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WE, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:893–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Poss R, Moreau R, Aventurier A, Fallavier P (2000) Effect of slaked lime and gypsum on acidity alleviation and nutrient leaching in an acid soil from Southern China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 57:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong DL, Xu RK (2012) Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of Ultisols from Southern China. J Environ Sci 24:682–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Li JY, Xu RK (2009) Use of agricultural by‐products to study the pH effects in an acid tea garden soil. Soil Use Manage 25:128–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Butterly C, Wang Y, Herath H, Xi Y, Xiao X (2014) Effect of crop residue biochar on soil acidity amelioration in strongly acidic tea garden soils. Soil Use Manage 27:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weligama C, Sale P, Conyers M, Liu D, Tang C (2010) Nitrate leaching stimulates subsurface root growth of wheat and increases rhizosphere alkalisation in a highly acidic soil. Plant Soil 328:119–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu RK, Coventry DR (2003) Soil pH changes associated with lupin and wheat plant materials incorporated in a red–brown earth soil. Plant Soil 250:113–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Tang C, Chen Z (2006) The role of plant residues in pH change of acid soils differing in initial pH. Soil Biol Biochem 38:709–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu TR (1997) Chemistry of variable charge soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK (2012) Effects of biochars generated from crop residues on chemical properties of acid soils from tropical and subtropical China. Soil Res 50:570–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Qian W, Wang RH (2011a) Comparison of the ameliorating effects on an acidic ultisol between four crop straws and their biochars. J Soils Sediments 11:741–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011b) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X, Han X, Yu X (2012) Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crop Res 127:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu QH, Peng XH, Huang TQ, Xie ZB, Holden NM (2014) Effect of biochar addition on maize growth and nitrogen use efficiency in acidic red soils. Pedosphere 24:699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB441003) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41230855). The CAS-TWAS President’s Fellowship for PhD studies in China was also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren-kou Xu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yong Sik Ok

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehmood, K., Li, Jy., Jiang, J. et al. Effect of low energy-consuming biochars in combination with nitrate fertilizer on soil acidity amelioration and maize growth. J Soils Sediments 17, 790–799 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1219-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1219-y

Keywords