Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Composition, particle size, charge, and colloidal stability of pH-fractionated humic acids

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to divide humic acids into several fractions by means of their dissolving in buffers with different pH values and to characterize obtained humic fractions with respect to their composition, structure, particle size, and charge. Relationships between determined characteristics of fractionated humic acids and pH values of used buffer solutions and the method of fractionation was investigated.

Materials and methods

Humic acids were fractionated by means of two different methods: the subsequent dissolution in buffers adjusted to different pH and the sequential dissolution in buffers with increasing pH values. Composition, structure, and properties of the obtained humic fractions were studied using elemental analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy, UV/VIS spectroscopy, and light scattering methods.

Results and discussion

As expected, fractions obtained by subsequent dissolution were more heterogeneous than those prepared by sequential extraction. Fractions obtained at lower pH values contained higher amounts of aromatic and carboxylic groups, while those extracted at higher pH values were rich in aliphatic and/or peptide groups. Fractions extracted close to neutral pH region had some specific properties. Functional groups dissociated in a range of pH values depending on the chemical structure of the molecules. Weaker carboxylic groups could dissociate in less acidic solutions, and more aromatic fractions could be dissolved. Conformational changes and deaggregation process differed with the fractionation procedure and concentration of studied solutions. A bimodal distribution of particle sizes and higher values of polydispersity were obtained for some for less concentrated solutions of humic fractions.

Conclusions

Obtained humic fractions behave as anionic heterogeneous ligands with many carboxylic and phenolic groups of different strength, and present polyfunctional and polyelectrostatic effects due to different functional sites and net charged groups. Two main processes can affect their properties and behavior in aqueous solutions: dissociation of acidic functional groups and breaking of humic aggregates into smaller molecular associations or humic molecules. An important parameter affecting the spatial arrangement of obtained humic fractions is their concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez-Puebla RA, Garrido JJ (2005) Effect of pH on the aggregation of a gray humic acid in colloidal and solid states. Chemosphere 59:659–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angelico R, Ceglie A, Ji-Zheng H, Palumbo G, Colombo C (2014) Particle size, charge and colloidal stability of humic acids coprecipitated with ferrihydrite. Chemosphere 99:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atalay YB, Carbonaro RF, Di Toro DM (2009) Distribution of proton dissociation constants for model humic and fulvic acid molecules. Environ Sci Technol 43:3626–3631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha M, Motelico-Heino M, Le Coustumer P (2006) Conformation and size of humic substances: effects of major cation concentration and type, pH, salinity, and residence time. Colloid Surf A 272:48–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakina LG, Orlova NE (2012) Special features of humus acids extraction from soils by sodium pyrophosphate solutions of different alkalinity. Euro Soil Sci 45:392–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barancikova G, Klucakova M, Madaras M, Makovnikova J, Pekar M (2003) Chemical structure of humic acids isolated from various soil types and lignite. Humic Subst Environ 3:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Campitelli PA, Velasco MI, Ceppi SB (2006) Chemical and physicochemical characteristics of humic acids extracted from compost, soil and amended soil. Talanta 69:1234–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Senesi N, Schnitzer M (1977) Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:352–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Gu B, LeBoeuf EJ, Pan H, Dai S (2002) Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere 48:59–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis MA, Witt AF, Schram SB, Rogers LB (1981) Humic acid fractionation using a nearly linear pH gradient. Anal Chem 53:1195–1199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai J, Ran W, Xing B, Gu M, Wang L (2006) Characterization of fulvic acid fractions obtained by sequential extractions with pH buffers, water, and ethanol from paddy soils. Geoderma 135:284–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Sato N, Tochiyama O (2005) Potentiometric study on the proton binding of humic substances. J Nucl Radiochem Sci 6:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M, González-Gaitano G, García-Mina JM (2006) The usefulness of UV–visible and fluorescence spectroscopies to study the chemical nature of humic substances from soils and composts. Org Geochem 37:1949–1959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujitake N, Kusumoto A, Tsukamoto M, Kawahigashi M, Suzuki T, Otsuka H (1998) Properties of soil humic substances in fractions obtained by sequential extraction with pyrophosphate solutions at different pHs. I. Yield and particle size distribution. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 44:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujitake N, Kusumoto A, Tsukamoto M, Noda Y, Suzuki T, Otsuka H (1999) Properties of soil humic substances in fractions obtained by sequential extraction with pyrophosphate solutions at different pHs. II. Elemental composition and UV–VIS spectra of humic acids. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:349–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujitake N, Kusumoto A, Tsukamoto M, Yanagi Y, Suzuki T, Otsuka H (2003) Properties of soil humic substances in fractions obtained by sequential extraction with pyrophosphate solutions at different pHs. III. FT-IR and 1H NMR spectra of humic acids. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic UD, Markovic MM, Cupac SB, Tomic ZP (2013) Soil humic acid aggregation by dynamic light scattering and laser Doppler electrophoresis. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:674–679

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kipton H, Powell HKJ, Town RM (1992) Solubility and fractionation of humic acid; effect of pH and ionic medium. Anal Chim Acta 267:47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klucakova M (2010) Adsorption of nitrate on humic acids studied by flow-through coulometry. Environ Chem Lett 8:145–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klucakova M, Pekar M (2003) Study of structure and properties of humic and fulvic acids. IV. Study of interactions of Cu2+ ions with humic gels and final comparison. J Polym Mater 20:155–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klucakova M, Pekar M (2008) Behaviour of partially soluble humic acids in aqueous suspension. Colloid Surf A 318:106–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klucakova M, Pekar M (2009) Transport of copper(II) ions in humic gel—new results from diffusion couple. Colloid Surf A 349:96–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korshin GV, Li CW, Benjamin MM (1997) Monitoring the properties of natural organic matter through UV spectroscopy: a consistent theory. Water Res 3:1787–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenheer JA, Wershaw RL, Brown GK, Reddy MM (2003) Characterization and diagenesis of strong-acid carboxyl groups in humic substances. Appl Geochem 18:471–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek R, Pospisil J, Taraba B (2011) The influence of temperature on the adsorption of CTAB on coals. Colloid Surf A 383:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peuravuori J, Zbankova P, Pihlaja K (2006) Aspects of structural features in lignite and lignite humic acids. Fuel Proc Technol 87:829–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peuravuori J, Simpson AJ, Lam B, Zbankova P, Pihlaja K (2007) Structural features of lignite humic acid in light of NMR and thermal degradation experiments. J Mol Struct 826:131–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo A, Conte P, Cozzolino A (1999) Effects of mineral and monocarboxylic acids on the molecular association of dissolved humic substances. Eur J Soil Sci 50:687–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JP, Mota AM, d’Oliveira JMR, Martinho JMG (1996) Dynamic properties of humic matter by dynamic light scattering and voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 329:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer M, Kahn SU (1972) Humic substances in the environment. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer M, Monreal CM (2011) Quo vadis soil organic matter research? A biological link to the chemistry of humification. Adv Agron 113:139–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Senesi N, Plaza C, Brunetti G, Polo A (2007) A comparative survey of recent results on humic-like fractions in organic amendments and effects on native soil humic substances. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1244–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan KH (2014) Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Town RM, Kipton H, Powell HKJ (1992) Elimination of adsorption effects in gel permeation chromatography of humic substances. Anal Chim Acta 256:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yonebayashi K, Hattori T (1989) Chemical and biological studies on environmental humic acids. II. 1H NMR and IR spectra of humic acids. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 35:383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yonebayashi K, Hattori T (1990) A new fractionation of soil humic acids by adsorption chromatography. Geoderma 47:327–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • You SJ, Thakali S, Allen HE (2006) Characteristics of soil organic matter (SOM) extracted using base with subsequent pH lowering and sequential pH extraction. Environ Int 32:101–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Project LO1211

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Materials Research Centre, Purkyňova 464/118, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    Martina Klučáková & Michal Kalina

Authors
  1. Martina Klučáková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michal Kalina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Klučáková.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Heike Knicker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klučáková, M., Kalina, M. Composition, particle size, charge, and colloidal stability of pH-fractionated humic acids. J Soils Sediments 15, 1900–1908 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1142-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1142-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation