Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 1330–1344 | Cite as

Techno-economic analysis of hydrocarbon-polluted soil treatment by using ex situ microwave heating: influence of soil texture and soil moisture on electric field penetration, operating conditions and energy costs

  • Pietro P. FalcigliaEmail author
  • Federico G. A. Vagliasindi
Soil Pollution and Remediation

Abstract

Purpose

Microwave (MW) heating has been identified as a potential cost-effective technique to remediate hydrocarbon-polluted soils; however, the soil texture and properties could have a great impact on its full-scale treatment. In addition, very limited energy and economical data on MW treatment are available, and this lack makes its real application very limited. In this work, a first experimental phase was performed simulating a MW of several hydrocarbon-polluted soils. Obtained data were elaborated for a techno-economic analysis.

Materials and methods

Four soil textures, corresponding to medium, fine silica sand (at different soil moistures), silt as silica flour and clay as kaolin, were artificially contaminated with diesel fuel and irradiated by MWs using a bench scale apparatus. Soil samples were treated applying four specific power values at different times. At the end, soil temperature was measured, whereas residual contaminant concentrations were measured and fitted considering and exponential decay kinetic model. Temperature data, as well as kinetic parameters obtained, were used for the techno-economic analysis. The changing of the internal electric field was calculated for all the soils and operating conditions, then considering initial contamination values ranging from 750 to 5000 mg kg−1, the minimal remediation time, specific energy and costs for the remediation were assessed.

Results and discussion

At low powers, MW effectiveness is limited by low soil moistures or fine soil textures due to a limitation of the electric field penetration, whereas when high powers are used soil properties have a limited effect. Remediation time, as a function of the initial contamination level, follows a linear trend, except for dry soils, for which an exponential trend was observed. For powers higher than 30 kW Kg−1, remediation times lower than about 100 min are needed, for all the moisturized soils, in order to treat a contamination of 5000 mg kg−1. The variation of soil moisture or soil texture results in the range 20–160 € ton−1, and doubled costs are required for the treatment of clayey soils respect to sandy soils.

Conclusions

The analysis performed suggests that soil layers lower than 70 cm should be considered for ex situ remediation. MW has been shown as a quick technique also for high hydrocarbon concentrations; however, for energy saving, the application of some powers should be avoid. Unmoisturized or fine texture soil treatment results in higher costs; however, a maximum cost of 160 € ton−1 generally makes MW heating a quick and cost-effective ex situ technique.

Keywords

Costs Hydrocarbon-contaminated soil Microwave (MW) remediation Operating conditions Soil texture Soil moisture 

References

  1. Benedetto A, Calvi A (2013) A pilot study on microwave heating for production and recycling of road pavement materials. Constr Build Mater 44:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calvert CA, Suib SL (2007) An initial study into the use of microwave remediation of hexachlorobenzene-treated soil using selected oxidants and coated graphite rods. J Soils Sediments 7:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Careghini A, Dastoli S, Ferrari G, Saponaro S, Bonomo L, De Propris L, Gabellini M (2010) Sequential solidification/stabilization and thermal process under vacuum for the treatment of mercury in sediments. J Soils Sediments 10:1646–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. da Rosa CFC, Freire DMG, Ferraz HC (2015) Biosurfactant microfoam: application in the removal of pollutants from soil. J Environ Chem Eng 3:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. dela Cruz ALN, Cook RL, Dellinger B, Lomnicki SM, Donnelly KC, Kelley MA, Cosgriff D (2014) Assessment of environmentally persistent free radicals in soils and sediments from three Superfund sites. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Do SH, Jo JH, Jo YH, Lee HK, Kong SH (2009) Application of peroxymonosulfate/cobalt (PMS(Co(II)) system to treat diesel contaminated soil. Chemosphere 77:1127–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falciglia PP, Giustra MG, Vagliasindi FGA (2011a) Influence of soil texture on contaminant adsorption capacity and removal efficiency in ex-situ remediation of diesel polluted soil by thermal desorption. Chem Ecol 27(1):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falciglia PP, Giustra MG, Vagliasindi FGA (2011b) Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil: influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics. J Hazard Mater 185:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falciglia PP, Urso G, Vagliasindi FGA (2013) Microwave heating remediation of soils contaminated with diesel fuel. J Soils Sediments 13(8):1396–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernández MD, Pro J, Alonso C, Aragonese P, Tarazona JV (2011) Terrestrial microcosms in a feasibility study on the remediation of diesel-contaminated soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:2133–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomes HI, Dias-Ferreira C, Ribeiro AB (2013) Overview of in situ and ex situ remediation technologies for PCB-contaminated soils and sediments and obstacles for full-scale application. Sci Total Environ 445–446:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallikainen MT, Ulaby FT, Dobson MC, El-Rayes MA, Wu LK (1985) Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil—part 1: empirical models and experimental observations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens GE-23(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang G, Zhao L, Dong Y, Zhang Q (2011) Remediation of soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls by microwave-irradiated manganese dioxide. J Hazard Mater 186:128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Islam MN, Jo YT, Park JH (2012) Remediation of PAHs contaminated soil by extraction using subcritical water. J Ind Eng Chem 18:1689–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Islam MN, Jo YT, Park JH (2014) Subcritical water remediation of petroleum and aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil: a semi-pilot scale study. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jagtap SS, Woo SM, Kim TS, Dhiman SS, Kim D, Lee JK (2014) Phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil and saccharification of the resulting biomass. Fuel 116:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawala Z, Atamaczuk T (1998) Microwave-enhanced thermal decontamination of soil. Environ Sci Technol 32:2602–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khalladi R, Benhabiles O, Bentahar F, Moulai-Mostefa N (2009) Surfactant remediation of diesel polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 164:1179–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lapham WW (1989) Use of temperature profiles beneath streams to determine rates of vertical groundwater flow and vertical hydraulic conductivity. USGS Water Supply Paper 2337Google Scholar
  20. Łebkowska M, Zborowska E, Karwowska E, Miaskiewicz-Peska E, Muszynski A, Tabernacka A, Naumczyk J, Jeczalik M (2011) Bioremediation of soil polluted with fuels by sequential multiple injection of native microorganisms: field-scale processes in Poland. Ecol Eng 37:1895–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee GT, Ro HM, Lee SM (2007) Effects of triethyl phosphate and nitrate on electrokinetically enhanced biodegradation of diesel in low permeability soils. Environ Tech 28(8):853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Zhang Y, Kravchenko I, Xu H, Zhang CG (2007) Dynamic changes in microbial activity and community structure during biodegradation of petroleum compounds: a laboratory experiment. J Environ Sci 19:1003–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li D, Zhang Y, Quan X, Zhao Y (2009) Microwave thermal remediation of crude oil contaminated soil enhanced by carbon fiber. J Environ Sci 21:1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin L, Yuan S, Chen J, Wang L, Wan J, Lu X (2010) Treatment of chloramphenicol-contaminated soil by microwave radiation. Chemosphere 78:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipińska A, Kucharski J, Wyszkowska J (2014) Activity of arylsulphatase in soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu PWG, Chang TC, Chih-Hung C, Wang MZ, Hsu HW (2013) Effects of soil organic matter and bacterial community shift on bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu PWG, Chang TC, Chen CH, Wang MZ, Hsu HW (2014) Bioaugmentation efficiency investigation on soil organic matters and microbial community shift of diesel-contaminated soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 95 part A:276–284Google Scholar
  28. Mavrogianopoulos GN, Frangoudakis A, Pandelakis J (2000) Energy efficient soil disinfestation by microwaves. J Agric Eng Res 75:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mena E, Villaseñor J, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA (2014) Effect of a direct electric current on the activity of a hydrocarbon-degrading microorganism culture used as the flushing liquid in soil remediation processes. Sep Purif Technol 124–18:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mena E, Ruiz C, Villaseñor J, Rodrigo MA, Cañizares P (2015) Biological permeable reactive barriers coupled with electrokinetic soil flushing for the treatment of diesel-polluted clay soil. J Hazard Mater 283:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pazos M, Plaza A, Martín M, Lobo MC (2012) The impact of electrokinetic treatment on a loamy-sand soil properties. Chem Eng J 183:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pereira MS, de Ávila PCM, Martins AL, de Sá CHM, de Souza Barrozo MA, Ataíde CH (2014) Microwave treatment of drilled cuttings contaminated by synthetic drilling fluid. Sep Purif Technol 124:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qi A, Chen T, Bai S, Yan M, Lu S, Buekens A, Yan J, Bulm C, Li X (2014) Effect of temperature and particle size on the thermal desorption of PCBs from contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4697–4704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Remya N, Lin JG (2011) Current status of microwave application in wastewater treatment—a review. Chem Eng J 166:797–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson JP, Kingman SW, Snape CE, Shang H, Barranco R, Saeid A (2009) Separation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils using microwaves heating. Sep Purif Technol 69:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robinson JP, Kingman SW, Lester EH, Yi C (2012) Microwave remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils—scale up using batch reactors. Sep Purif Technol 96:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson J, Binner E, Saeid A, Al-Harahsheh M, Kingman S (2014) Microwave processing of oil sands and contribution of clay minerals. Fuel 135:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silva-Castro GA, Rodelas B, Perucha C, Laguna J, González-López J, Calvo C (2013) Bioremediation of diesel-polluted soil using biostimulation as post-treatment after oxidation with Fenton-like reagents: assays in a pilot plant. Sci Total Environ 445–446:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sprocati AR, Alisi C, Tasso F, Marconi P, Sciullo A, Pinto V, Chiavarini S, Ubaldi C, Cremisin C (2012) Effectiveness of a microbial formula, as a bioaugmentation agent, tailored for bioremediation of diesel oil and heavy metal co-contaminated soil. Process Biochem 47(11):1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Szulc A, Ambrozewicz D, Sydow M, Ławniczak Ł, Piotrowska-Cyplik A, Marecik R, Chrzanowski Ł (2014) The influence of bioaugmentation and biosurfactant addition on bioremediation efficiency of diesel-oil contaminated soil: feasibility during field studies. J Environ Manag 132:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tatàno F, Felici F, Mangani F (2013) Lab-scale treatability tests for the thermal desorption of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Soil Sediment Contam 22:433–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsai TT, Sah J, Kao CM (2010) Application of iron electrode corrosion enhanced electrokinetic-Fenton oxidation to remediate diesel contaminated soils: a laboratory feasibility study. J Hydrol 380:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. US-EPA (2004) Remediation technology cost compendium—year 2000, Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA-542-R-01-009Google Scholar
  44. Yuan S, Tian M, Lu X (2006) Microwave remediation of soil contaminated with hexachlorobenzene. J Hazard Mater B137:878–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pietro P. Falciglia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Federico G. A. Vagliasindi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations