Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 1306–1315 | Cite as

Climatic influence on mobility of organic pollutants in Technosols from contrasted industrial activities

  • Robin Dagois
  • Christophe SchwartzEmail author
  • Samuel Coussy
  • Catherine Lorgeoux
  • Stéphanie Ouvrard
  • Pierre Faure
Soil Pollution and Remediation

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding long-term effects of climate on soil with organic contaminations is a major advantage for natural attenuation assessment. However, studies are often limited to evaluating the evolution of availability of one/several selected contaminant(s) spiked into natural or agricultural soils. These approaches are not representative of real cases of industrial wastelands. In this study, we want to understand the evolution of a broad set of anthropogenic soil and especially the organic matter reactivity through climate aging factors.

Materials and methods

Eleven soils were sampled from representative former industrial sites contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (coking and gas plants, backfills). They were broadly characterized and then aged through several experimental climatic simulations in controlled conditions: freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs), wetting-drying cycles (WDCs), and heating on dry and wet soil (HDS and HWS). The variation of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content was used as an indicator of the modification of the organic matter reactivity induced by climate aging modalities.

Results and discussion

Physico-chemical soil characterization indicates similar characteristics to those of Technosols but very different compared to natural/agricultural soils. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed a clear correlation between initial DOC, PAH concentration, and the solvent extractible fraction of organic matter. This means that DOC is a clear indicator of technogenic organic matter mobility. After aging, DOC followed several significant trends depending on the aging modality. These trends were controlled by the competition of (i) biodegradation/oxidation, (ii) formation/disruption of aggregates, and (iii) sorption/desorption processes. A multivariate analysis performed by PCA revealed that DOC variations were strongly linked with the silt fraction and the occurrence of vegetation cover after FTC, HWS, and HDS. These parameters emphasized their important role as regulating the reactivity of organic compounds during climate aging.

Conclusions

This study provides the first steps to assess natural evolution and natural attenuation of organic pollutants in historically contaminated soils. This original approach reveals the influence of climate aging on the reactivity of technogenic organic matter. Moreover, this influence appears to be particularly intensified in soil with a high silt fraction and the occurrence of vegetation cover.

Keywords

Aging DOC PAH Technogenic organic matter Technosols 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the French Environmental Agency (Ademe; Hélène Roussel) and the French Geological and Mining Research Institute (BRGM; Céline Blanc and Philippe Bataillard) for their financial support and advices through this work. We also wish to thank the French Industrial Wasteland Scientific Interest Group (Gisfi; Noële Raoult, Mélanie Malacarne, Lucas Charrois, and Rémi Baldo) for their technical help and providing us samples of the studied materials. The authors wish to thank Adeline Bouchard (LSE), Delphine Catteloin (Georessources), Alain Rakoto (LSE), and Frédéric Rees (LSE) for helpful discussions and technical support.

References

  1. Ahel M (1991) Infiltration of organic pollutants into groundwater: field studies in the alluvial aquifer of the Sava River. Bull Env Contam Toxicol 47:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amézketa E (1999) Soil aggregate stability: a review. J Sustain Agric 14:83–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnier C, Ouvrard S, Robin C, Morel J (2014) Desorption kinetics of PAHs from aged industrial soils for availability assessment. Sci Total Environ 470:639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biache C, Ghislain T, Faure P, Mansuy-Huault L (2011) Low temperature oxidation of a coking plant soil organic matter and its major constituents: an experimental approach to simulate a long term evolution. J Hazard Mater 188:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biache C, Mansuy-Huault L, Faure P et al (2008) Effects of thermal desorption on the composition of two coking plant soils: Impact on solvent extractable organic compounds and metal bioavailability. Environ Pollut 156:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Børresen MH, Barnes DL, Rike AG (2007) Repeated freeze–thaw cycles and their effects on mineralization of hexadecane and phenanthrene in cold climate soils. Cold Reg Sci Technol 49:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cébron A, Faure P, Lorgeoux C et al (2013) Experimental increase in availability of a PAH complex organic contamination from an aged contaminated soil: Consequences on biodegradation. Environ Pollut 177:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Engelhard MH (2008) Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:1598–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelissen G, Rigterink H, Ferdinandy MM, van Noort PC (1998) Rapidly desorbing fractions of PAHs in contaminated sediments as a predictor of the extent of bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 32:966–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornelissen G, van Noort PC, Parsons JR, Govers HA (1997) Temperature dependence of slow adsorption and desorption kinetics of organic compounds in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 31:454–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson EA (1993) Soil water content and the ratio of nitrous oxide to nitric oxide emitted from soil. Biogeochem Glob Change 369–386Google Scholar
  12. DeLuca TH, Keeney DR, McCarty GW (1992) Effect of freeze-thaw events on mineralization of soil nitrogen. Biol Fertil Soils 14:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dibble JT, Bartha R (1979) Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:729–739Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson M, Ka JO, Mohn WW (2001) Effects of low temperature and freeze-thaw cycles on hydrocarbon biodegradation in Arctic tundra soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5107–5112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faure P, Schlepp L, Burkle-Vitzthum V, Elie M (2003) Low temperature air oxidation of n-alkanes in the presence of Na-smectite⋆. Fuel 82:1751–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2006) Guidelines for soil description. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazard Mater 172:532–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh U, Zimmerman JR, Luthy RG (2003) PCB and PAH speciation among particle types in contaminated harbor sediments and effects on PAH bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol 37:2209–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. GisSol (2011) Synthèse sur l’état des sols en France. Groupement d’intérêt scientifique sur les sols. 24 pGoogle Scholar
  20. Haeseler F, Blanchet D, Druelle V et al (1999) Analytical characterization of contaminated soils from former manufactured gas plants. Environ Sci Technol 33:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanser O, Biache C, Boulangé M et al (2014) Evolution of dissolved organic matter during abiotic oxidation of coal tar—comparison with contaminated soils under natural attenuation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:1431–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1995) Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 29:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IUSS Working Group (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kottler BD, White JC, Kelsey JW (2001) Influence of soil moisture on the sequestration of organic compounds in soil. Chemosphere 42:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehrsch GA, Sojka RE, Carter DL, Jolley PM (1991) Freezing effects on aggregate stability affected by texture, mineralogy, and organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1401–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lennartz B, Louchart X (2007) Effect of drying on the desorption of diuron and terbuthylazine from natural soils. Environ Pollut 146:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundquist EJ, Jackson LE, Scow KM (1999) Wet–dry cycles affect dissolved organic carbon in two California agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1031–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morel JLM, Schwartz C, Florentin L, de Kimpe C (2005) Urban soil. Hillel Encycl Soils Environ 202–208Google Scholar
  30. Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Labuzek S (2003) Bacterial degradation and bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Pol J Environ Stud 12:15–25Google Scholar
  31. Nam K, Alexander M (1998) Role of nanoporosity and hydrophobicity in sequestration and bioavailability: tests with model solids. Environ Sci Technol 32:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nam K, Chung N, Alexander M (1998) Relationship between organic matter content of soil and the sequestration of phenanthrene. Environ Sci Technol 32:3785–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nam K, Kim JY, Oh DI (2003) Effect of soil aggregation on the biodegradation of phenanthrene aged in soil. Environ Pollut 121:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ouvrard S, Chenot E-D, Masfaraud J-F, Schwartz C (2013) Long-term assessment of natural attenuation : statistical approach on soil with aged PAH contamination. Biodegradation 24:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pernot A, Ouvrard S, Leglize P et al (2014) Impact of fresh organic matter incorporation on PAH fate in a contaminated industrial soil. Sci Total Environ 497–498:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pernot A, Ouvrard S, Léglize P, Faure P (2013) Protective role of fine silts for PAH in a former industrial soil. Environ Pollut 179:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Core Team (2013) R: a Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 304 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Séré G, Schwartz C, Ouvrard S et al (2010) Early pedogenic evolution of constructed Technosols. J Soils Sediments 10:1246–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer MJ, Southard RJ, Warrington DN, Janitzky P (1992) Stability of synthetic sand-clay aggregates after wetting and drying cycles. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1843–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. US EPA (1999) Use of monitored natural attenuation at superfund, RCRA corrective action, and underground storage tank sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Directive no. 9200.4-17PGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner S, Cattle SR, Scholten T (2007) Soil-aggregate formation as influenced by clay content and organic-matter amendment. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White JC, Kelsey JW, Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1997) Factors affecting sequestration and bioavailability of phenanthrene in soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:2040–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao Q, Li P, Stagnitti F et al (2009) Effects of aging and freeze-thawing on extractability of pyrene in soil. Chemosphere 76:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao Q, Xing B, Tai P et al (2013) Effect of freeze–thawing cycles on soil aging behavior of individually spiked phenanthrene and pyrene at different concentrations. Sci Total Environ 444:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Dagois
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Christophe Schwartz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samuel Coussy
    • 4
  • Catherine Lorgeoux
    • 3
  • Stéphanie Ouvrard
    • 1
  • Pierre Faure
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, UMR 1120Université de Lorraine—INRAVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux, UMR 7360Université de Lorraine—CNRSVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire GeoRessources, UMR 7359Université de Lorraine—CNRSVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  4. 4.Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Gestion des Sites, Sols et Sédiments pollués (3SP)OrléansFrance
  5. 5.Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’EnergieAngersFrance

Personalised recommendations