Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 1323–1329 | Cite as

New alternative method of benzo[a]pyrene extractionfrom soils and its approbation in soil under technogenic pressure

  • Svetlana N. Sushkova
  • Tatiana M. Minkina
  • Saglara S. Mandzhieva
  • Galina K. Vasilyeva
  • Nikolay I. Borisenko
  • Irina G. Turina
  • Olga V. Bolotova
  • Tatiana V. Varduni
  • Rıdvan Kızılkaya
Soil Pollution and Remediation

Abstract

Purpose

The optimization of benzo[a]pyrene extraction conditions by subcritical water extraction method from soils is the purpose of the research. The optimal conditions for benzo[a]pyrene recovery are 30-min extraction by water in a special steel cartridge at 250 °C and 100 atm.

Materials and methods

Studies were conducted on the soils of monitoring plots subjected to Novocherkassk Power Station emissions. Monitoring plots were established at different distances from the Novocherkassk Power Station (NPS; 1.0–20.0 km).

Results and discussion

It was shown that the use of water in subcritical state as a solvent for benzo[a]pyrene extraction from soil allows to avoid large volumes of organic solvents and to decrease the time of sample preparation. It is shown that the maximum benzo[a]pyrene maintenance was observed in soils of the monitoring plots located most close (to 5 km) to a pollution source in the area of the prevailing direction of a wind rose. Dynamics of pollutant accumulation in soils depend on number of Novocherkassk state district power station emissions.

Conclusions

The method of benzo[a]pyrene subcritical water extraction from soil was developed and approbated during long-term monitoring researches of technogenic polluted territories. The optimum conditions for benzo[a]pyrene extraction from soil have been determined: the soil is treating by subcritical water at 250 °C and 100 atm of pressure for 30 min. Trends in the accumulation of benzo[a]pyrene in soil zones of the thermal power plant influence have been researched over a 5-year period of monitoring observations by subcritical water extraction method. Benzo[a]pyrene accumulation in soils depends on the technogenic emissions to the atmosphere from Novocherkassk power station and on the soil physical and chemical properties.

Keywords

Benzo[a]pyrene Extraction Monitoring Soil Subcritical water 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by projects of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, no. 5.885.2014/К, Grant of President of Russian Federation no. MK 6827.2015.4 and Scientific Research Grant (TUBITAK-1110698) from The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Analytical work was carried out on the equipment of Centers for collective use of Southern Federal University “High Technology”, grant RFMEFI59414X0002, “Biotechnology, Biomedical and Environmental Monitoring”.

References

  1. Antizar-Ladislao B, Lopez-Real J, Beck A (2006) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an aged coal tar contaminated soil under in-vessel composting conditions. Environ Pollut 141(3):459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cachada A, Pereira R, da Silva E, Duarte A (2014) The prediction of PAHs bioavailability in soils using chemical methods: state of the art and future challenges. Sci Total Environ 472:463–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr A, Mammucari R, Foster N (2011) A review of subcritical water as a solvent and its utilisation for the processing of hydrophobic organic compounds. Chem Eng J 172(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dadkhah A, Akgerman A (2006) Hot water extraction with in situ wet oxidation: kinetics of PAHs removal from soil. J Hazard Mater 137(1):518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency (2002) Contaminants in soil: Collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. Benzo[a]pyrene. Technical report: Bristol Environment AgencyGoogle Scholar
  6. Directive document 52.10.556-95 (2002) Methodical Instructions. Definition of Polluting Substances in Sediments and Suspension. Roshydromet, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  7. Domeno C, Blasco M, Sanchez C, Nerin C (2006) A fast extraction technique for extracting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from lichens samples used as biomonitors of air pollution: dynamic sonication versus other methods. Anal Chim Acta 569(1–2):103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabov D, Beznosikov V (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tundra soils of the Komi Republic. Eurasian Soil Sci 47(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galkin А, Lunin V (2005) Water in sub- and supercritical conditions is a universal fluid for implementation of chemical reactions. Success Chem 74(1):24–40Google Scholar
  10. Gennadiev A, Tsibart A (2013) Pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of reserved and anthropogenically modified areas: factors and features of accumulation. Eurasian Soil Sci 46(1):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GOST (2004) State standard (Russian Federation State standard specification) Conservation. Soils. Classification of chemicals for pollution control: Standards Publishing House Moscow GOST 17.4.1.02.-83Google Scholar
  12. Hawthorne S, Grabanski C, Martin E, Miller D (2000) Comparisons of Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix. J Chromatogr A 892(1–2):421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Islam M, Jo Y, Park J (2014) Subcritical water remediation of petroleum and aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil: a semi-pilot scale study. Water Air Soil Pollut. doi: 10.1007/s11270-014-2037-3 Google Scholar
  14. ISO 13877–2005 (2005) Soil quality - Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons - Method using high -performance liquid chromatographyGoogle Scholar
  15. Jian Y (2004) Photomutagenicity of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the US EPA priority pollutant list. Mutat Res 557:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kocher B, Azzam F, Cutright T, Lee S (1995) Near-critical and supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from town gas soil. Energy Sources 17(2):213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lagadec A, Miller D, Lilke A, Hawthorne S (2000) Pilot-scale subcritical water remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon- and pesticide-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1542–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latawiec A, Reid B (2010) Sequential extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using subcritical water. Chemosphere 78(8):1042–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lekar A, Borisenko S, Vetrova E, Sushkova S, Borisenko N (2013) Extraction of quercetin from Polygonum hydropiper L. by subcritical water. Am J Agric Biol Sci 9(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A (2013) The levels and composition of persistent organic pollutants in alluvial agriculture soils affected by flooding. Environ Monit Assess 185(12):9935–9948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mandzhieva S, Minkina T, Pinskiy D, Bauer T, Sushkova S (2014) The role of soil's particle-size fractions in the adsorption of heavy metals. Eur J Soil Sci 3:197–205Google Scholar
  22. Minkina T, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, Tjurina I, Filonova O (2013) Monitoring researches of the benzo[a]pyrene content in soils under the influence of the technogenic zone. Middle East J Sci Res 17(1):44–49Google Scholar
  23. Minkina T, Pinsky D, Mandzhieva S, Bauer T, Sushkova S, Kushnareva A (2014) Effect of an attendant anion on the balance of cations in the soil-solution system with an ordinary chernozem as an example. Eurasian Soil Sci 47(8):772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Procedure of measurements benz(a)pyrene content in soils, sediments and sludges by highly effective liquid chromatography method (2008) Certificate 27–08: Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Smith R (2002) Extractions with superheated water. Rev J Chromatogr A 975:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sokolov A (1975) Agrochemical methods of soil study. Science publishing, Moscow, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  27. Sushkova S, Minkina T, Mandzhieva S, Tjurina I (2013) Elaboration and approbation of methods for benzo[a]pyrene extraction from soils for monitoring of the ecological state in technogenic landscapes. World Appl Sci J 25(10):1432–1437Google Scholar
  28. Sushkova S, Vasilyeva G, Minkina T, Mandzhieva S, Tjurina I, Kolesnikov S, Kizilkaya R, Askin T (2014) New method for benzo[a]pyrene analysis in plant material using subcritical water extraction. J Geochem Explor 144-Part B 144:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sushkova S, Minkina T, Mandzhieva S, Borisenko N, Vasilyeva G, Kızılkaya R, Aşkın T (2015) Approbation of express-method for benzo[a]pyrene extraction from soils in the technogenic emission zone territories. Eur J Soil Sci 4:15–21Google Scholar
  30. Tsibart A, Gennadiev A (2013) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils: sources, behavior, and indication significance. Eurasian Soil Sci 46(7):728–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. US EPA (1996a) Method 3540C. Soxhlet Extraction: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Rev. 3:1–8Google Scholar
  32. US EPA (1996b) Method 3561. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Rev. 0:1–14Google Scholar
  33. US EPA (2007a) Method 3550C Ultrasonic Extraction: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Rev. 3:1–17Google Scholar
  34. US EPA (2007b) Method 3545A Pressurized Fluid Extraction (PFE), The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Rev. 1:1–16Google Scholar
  35. Wenzl T, Simon R, Kleiner J, Anklam E (2006) Analytical methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food and the environment needed for new food legislation in the European Union. Trend Anal Chem 25(7):716–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svetlana N. Sushkova
    • 1
  • Tatiana M. Minkina
    • 1
  • Saglara S. Mandzhieva
    • 1
  • Galina K. Vasilyeva
    • 2
  • Nikolay I. Borisenko
    • 3
  • Irina G. Turina
    • 1
  • Olga V. Bolotova
    • 1
  • Tatiana V. Varduni
    • 1
  • Rıdvan Kızılkaya
    • 4
  1. 1.Academy of Biology and BiotechnologySouthern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, RASPushchinoRussia
  3. 3.Scientific Research Institute of Physics and Organic ChemistrySouthern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia
  4. 4.Faculty of AgricultureOndokuz Mayıs UniversitySamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations