Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatiotemporal distribution of soil nutrients within an abandoned cattle feedlot

  • SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nutrients from cropland and feedlot operations can move through preferential pathways into wetlands, groundwater, and surface water, which can cause adverse health and ecological problems. It is hypothesized that nitrogen (N) can cause a short-term contamination of soils and groundwater beneath feedlots, but phosphorus (P) can cause both short- and long-term contamination in well-drained soils. This paper examines the spatial and temporal distribution of nutrients within an abandoned feedlot and adjacent wetlands.

Materials and methods

Fifteen O-horizon, sixty-three composite O- and A-horizon, and sixty-one B-horizon composite grab samples from five different soils within a northwest Minnesota (USA) feedlot and adjacent wetlands were collected and analyzed for P, nitrate (NO3 ), and ammonium (NH4 +). Groundwater data from a deep-monitoring well were used to examine the change in nutrient concentration through time.

Results and discussion

Spatiotemporal distribution of nutrients indicated alignment of high concentration of P within the well-drained soil at the former feedlot pens and low concentration within the wetlands. By contrast, NO3 showed high concentrations in the wetland compared with the pens. The well-drained soils indicated leaching of NO3 in most of the area and sequestration of P. Groundwater data indicated a decline in NO3 concentration through time.

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest that NO3 poses short-term contamination of soil and groundwater in feedlots, but P poses both short- and long-term problems due to sequestration and immobilization, which may not impact soil-quality downgradient from the feedlot unless intense erosion and runoff occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound JP, Voulvoulis N (2004) Pharmaceutical in the aquatic environment—a comparison of risk assessment strategies. Chemosphere 56(11):1143–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell D, Drangert J, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixen PE (2009) World fertilizer nutrient reserves—a view to the future. Better Crop 93(3):8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK, Desjardins RL, Worth D (2011) Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester. Biomass Bioenergy 35(9):3927–3935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gbolo P, Gerla PJ (2013) Statistical analysis to characterize transport of nutrients in groundwater near an abandoned feedlot. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerla PJ, Cornett MW, Ekstein JD, Ahlering MA (2012) Talking big: lessons learned from a 9000 hectare restoration in the northern Tallgrass Prairie. Sustain 4(11):3066–3087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris KL, Moran SR, Clayton L (1974) Late quaternary stratigraphic nomenclature, Red River Valley, North Dakota and Minnesota. ND Geol Surv Misc Ser 52:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic p in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooda PS, Truesdala VW, Edwards AC, Withers PJA, Aitken MN, Rendell AR (2001) Manuring and fertilization effects on phosphorus accumulation in soils and potential environmental implications. Adv Environ Res 5:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedfoward networks are universal approximator. Neutral Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hristov AN, Hanigan M, Cole A, Todd R, McAllister TA, Ndegwa P, Rotz A (2011) Review: ammonia emission from dairy farms and beef feedlots. Can J Anim Sci 91:1–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RK, Newton GL, Hill GM (2004) Water quality and the grazing animal. J Anim Sci 82(E-Suppl):E255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet W, Truyen B, de Green P, Lemahieu I (2005) Global optimization in inverse problems. A compassion of kriging and radial basis functions. Available at http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2006/WS-06-08/WS06-08-009.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2014

  • Jones C, Jacobsen J (2005) Phosphorus cycling, testing and fertilizer recommendations. Nutrient management module no. 4. Montana State University Extension Service Publication 4449-4

  • Kemper N, Farber H, Skutlarek D, Krieter J (2008) Analysis of antibiotic residues in liquid manure and leachate of dairy farms in Northern Germany. Agric Water Manag 95:1288–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz I, O’Reilly CD, Tunney H (2006) Impact of cattle on soil physical properties and nutrient concentrations in overland flow from pasture in Ireland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113(1–4):378–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lange IG, Daxenberger A, Schiffer B, Witters H, Ibarreta D, Meyer HGD (2002) Sex hormones originating from different livestock production systems: fate and potential disrupting activity in the environment. Anal Chem Acta 473:27–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marino P, De Ferrari G, Bechini L (2008) Description of a sample of liquid dairy manures and relationships between analytical variables. Biosyst Eng 100(2):256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx ES, Hart J, Stevens RG (1999) Soil test interpretation guide. Oregon State University, 2 p

  • McAllister TA, Topp E (2012) Role of livestock in microbiological contamination of water: commonly the blame, but not always the source. Anim Front 2(2):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JJ, Beasley BW, Drury CF (2013) Transport of residual soluble salts and total sulfur through intact soil cores amended with fresh or composted beef cattle feedlot manure for nine years. Compost Sci Util 21(1):22–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons (formerly Van Nostrand Reinhold), New York

  • Monteny GJ, Erisman JW (1998) Ammonia emission from dairy cow buildings: a review of measurement techniques, influencing factors and possibilities for reduction. Neth J Agric Sci 46(3/4):225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Netthisinghe AP, Cook KL, Rice C, Gilfillen RA, Sistani KR (2012) Spatial variation of nutrients, pharmaceuticals and bacteria across a cattle backgrounding operation. J Environ Qual 42(2):532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyamangara J, Piha MI, Kirchmann H (1999) Interactions of aerobically decomposed cattle manure and nitrogen fertilizer applied to soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 54(2):183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik J, Gallant A (1988) Ecoregions of the upper Midwest States. EPA/600/3-88-037. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Paytan A, McLaughlin K (2007) The oceanic phosphorus cycle. Chem Rev 107(2):563–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierzynski GM, Sims JT, Vance GF (1994) Soils and environmental quality. Lewis Pubhshers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 313 p

  • Richardson CJ (1985) Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands. Science 228(4706):1424–1427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz CA (2004) Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. J Anim Sci 82(13):E119–E137

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager M (2007) Trace and nutrient elements in manure, dung and compost samples in Austria. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1383–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Menzel RG (1987) The impact of soil and fertilizer phosphorus on the environment. Adv Agron 41:257–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton LW, Braithwaite RR, Hall CH, Mackenzie ML (2007) Survival of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in bovine feces on pasture. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(23):7917–7925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson NP, Mielke LN (1973) Solids trap for beef cattle feedlot runoff. Trans ASAE 16(4):743–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeten JM (1979) Manure management for cattle feedlots. L-1094. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

  • Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD (1985) Soil fertility and fertilizers, 4th edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2012) Soil survey of Polk County, Minnesota

  • US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) (2013) Meat animal production, disposition, and income 2012 summary. 5 p

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003) National pollution discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitation guidelines and standards for concentration animal feeding operations (CAFO), final rule. Fed Reg 68(29):7175–7274

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2005) EPA Pacific Southwest, Region 9 webpage, “What’s the problem?”

  • Vaillant GC, Pierzynski GM, Ham JM, Derouchey J (2009) Nutrient accumulation below cattle feedlot pens in Kansas. J Environ Qual 38(3):909–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn HH (1998) Factors affecting manure quantity, quality, and use. Proceedings of the Mid-South Ruminant Nutrition Conference, Dallas-Ft. Worth, 7–8 May 1998. Texas Animal Nutrition Council, pp 9–20

  • Van Horn HH, Newton GL, Kunkle WE (1996) Ruminant nutrition from an environmental perspective: factors affecting whole-farm nutrient balance. J Anim Sci 74(12):3082–3102

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oostrom AJ, Russell JM (1994) Denitrification in constructed wastewater wetlands receiving high concentrations of nitrate. Water Sci Technol 29:7–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walbridge MR, Struthers JP (1993) Phosphorus retention in non-tidal palustrine forested wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic Region. Wetlands 13:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Mankin KR, Marchin GL (2004) Survival of fecal bacteria in dairy cow manure. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 47:1239–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funds from the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Plains and Prairie Potholes Landscape Conservation Cooperative, US Geological Survey, the North Dakota View Scholarship, the Dr. Alan Cvancara Field Research Scholarship, and the North Dakota Water Resources Research Fellowship. The authors would also like to thank Abdul Benson, Bryce Klasen, Carleigh Lider, Luke Belanus, and Darin Buri for their help and also the anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the content and quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prosper Gbolo.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Fanghua Hao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gbolo, P., Gerla, P.J. Spatiotemporal distribution of soil nutrients within an abandoned cattle feedlot. J Soils Sediments 15, 71–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0971-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0971-8

Keywords

Navigation