Skip to main content

Ecosystem services provided by soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas (SUITMAs)

Journal of Soils and Sediments volume 15, pages 1659–1666 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The sustainable use and management of global soils is one of the greatest challenges for the future. In the urban ecosystem, soils play an essential role with their functions and ecosystem services. However, they are still poorly taken into consideration to enhance the sustainable development of urban ecosystems. This paper proposes a categorization of soils of urbanized areas, i.e., areas strongly affected by human activities, according to their ecosystem services.

Materials and methods

Focus is put first on ecosystem services provided by non-urban soils. Then, the characteristics and number of services provided by soil groups of urbanized areas and their importance are given for each soil group.

Results and discussion

Soils of urbanized areas are here defined as SUITMAs, because they include soils of urban, sensu stricto, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas. This definition refers to a large number of soil types of strongly anthropized areas. SUITMAs were organized in four soil groups, i.e., (1) pseudo-natural soils, (2) vegetated engineered soils, (3) dumping site soils, and (4) sealed soils. For each soil group, examples for ecosystem services were given, evaluated, and ranked.

Conclusions

This proposal contributes to foster the dialogue between urban spatial planning and soil scientists to improve both soil science in the city and recognition of SUITMAs regarding their role for the sustainable development of urban ecosystems and, in particular, to enhance multifunctional soils in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Charzynski P, Hulisz P, Bednarek R (2013) Technogenic soils of Poland. Polish Society of Soil Science, Torun, ISBN 978-83-934096-1-7, 358 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Blignaut J, Van Der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Elmqvist T, Farley J (2002) Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conserv Biol 27:1286–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. International Workshop on Ecosystems Services—solution for problems of a problem that needs solution. Salzau, Germany, May 2008. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kimpe C, Morel JL (2000) Urban soils management: a growing concern. Soil Sci 165:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A (2010) A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69:1858–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2012) Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing. doi:10.2779/75498. ISBN 978-92-79-26210-4, 64 p

  • European Commission—DG ENV (2010) Soil biodiversity: functions, threats and tools for policy makers. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/biodiversity.htm

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’Farrell P, Andersson E, Hamstead Z, Kremer P (2013) Urban ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services. Challenges and global opportunities: a global assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495:305–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huot H, Simonnot MO, Marion P, Yvon J, De Donato P, Morel JL (2013) Characteristics and potential pedogenetic processes of a Technosol developing on iron industry deposits. J Soils Sediments 13:555–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World soil resources reports no. 103, 2nd edn. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson T (2011) Toward a sustainable New York city: greening through urban forest restoration. In: Slavin MI (ed) Sustainability in America’s cities: creating the green metropolis. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) http://www.maweb.org/en/Index.aspx

  • Nehls T, Jozefaciuk G, Sokolowska Z, Hajnos M, Wessolek G (2008) Filter properties of seam material from paved urban soils. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:691–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York City Soil Survey Staff (2005) New York city reconnaissance soil survey. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Staten Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberndorfer E, Lundholm J, Bass B, Coffman RR, Doshi H, Dunnett N, Gaffin S, Köhler M, Liu KKY, Rowe B (2007) Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. Bioscience 57:823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve A (2012) A basis for a pragmatic inquiry into the policy considerations related to the increased application of Biophilic Urbanism. 11th Urban Environment Symposium 16–19 September. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera M (2013) Political criteria for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) selection and the role of the urban dimension. Sustainability 5:5034–5051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (2007) Classification of urban and industrial soils in the world reference base for soil resources. J Soils Sediments 7(2):96–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers M, van Wijnen HJ, Schouten AJ, Mulder C, Kuiten AMP, Brussaard L, Breure AM (2012) A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms. Sci Total Environ 415:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sere G, Schwartz C, Ouvrard S, Sauvage C, Renat JC, Morel JL (2008) Soil construction: a step for ecological reclamation of derelict lands. J Soils Sediments 8:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toland AR, Wessolek G (2010) Soil art: bridging the communication gap. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1–6 August, Brisbane, Australia, http://www.iuss.org/19th%20WCSS/Symposium/pdf/2104.pdf

  • Trabucchi M, Comin FA, O’Farrell PJ (2013) Hierarchical priority setting for restoration in a watershed in NE Spain, based on assessments of soil erosion and ecosystem services. Reg Environ Chang 1:911–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2011) World population prospect. The 2010 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Volume I, New York

  • van Wijnen HJ, Rutgers M, Schouten AJ, Mulder C, de Zwart D, Breure AM (2012) How to calculate the spatial distribution of ecosystem services—natural attenuation as example from The Netherlands. Sci Total Environ 415:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasenev VI, Stoorvogel JJ, Vasenev II (2013) Urban soil organic carbon and its spatial heterogeneity in comparison with natural and agricultural areas in the Moscow region. Catena 107:96–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh DC, LaFleur RG (1995) Landfills in New York City—1844–1994. Ground Water 33:556–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wessolek G (2008) Sealing of soils. In: Urban ecology, an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, pp 161–179

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, UMR 1120, Université de Lorraine, 2, Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, TSA 40602, 54518, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France

    Jean Louis Morel

  2. Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, UMR 1120, INRA, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, TSA 40602, 54518, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France

    Jean Louis Morel

  3. Bioemco, AgroParisTech, Grignon, Thiverval Grignon, 78850, France

    Claire Chenu

  4. Global Soil Forum, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, 14467, Potsdam, Germany

    Klaus Lorenz

  5. The Ohio State University, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, 414B Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Klaus Lorenz

Authors
  1. Jean Louis Morel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Chenu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Klaus Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Louis Morel.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerd Wessolek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morel, J.L., Chenu, C. & Lorenz, K. Ecosystem services provided by soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas (SUITMAs). J Soils Sediments 15, 1659–1666 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0926-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0926-0

Keywords

  • Soil functions
  • Technosol
  • Urban environment
  • Urban soil groups