Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the use of erosion modeling to support payment for environmental services programs

  • PROGRESS IN EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION IN LATIN AMERICA
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Payment for environmental services (PES) has assumed increasing importance in discussions about sustainable development strategies. Many of the PES programs are based on water erosion control and the corresponding environmental and economic benefits generated in the basins where they are implemented. The main objective of this study was to show how erosion susceptibility models can support PES programs.

Materials and methods

The application of the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) in the Sarandi Experimental River Basin (32.7 km2), located in the Federal District, Brazil, was used as a study case. Then a scheme for organizing knowledge about ecosystem services related to erosion control and water resources was performed. Considering the generated scheme, the USLE results, the land use map, and the water use in the region, we evaluated how erosion modeling could support PES programs.

Results and discussion

The results show that a large part of the study basin (90%) presents “low” susceptibility to erosion, which is significant in terms of the use and conservation of ecosystem services, as well as being a limitation regarding the need for the implantation of PES programs for erosion control. Incentives for maintaining the natural vegetation in areas with higher erosion susceptibility have the greatest potential to justify PES programs in the study basin, and the sanitation company is the potential payer for erosion control in the Sarandi River Basin.

Conclusions

The application of the USLE in a spatially distributed form proved to be an important support tool for land management and the implementation of PES policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennet EM, Peterson GD, Levitt EA (2005) Looking to the future of ecosystem services. Ecosyst 8:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni J, Lombardi Neto F (1990) Conservação do solo. Ícone, São Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves HML, Braga B, Domingues AF, Santos DG (2004) Quantificação dos benefícios ambientais e compensações financeiras do “Programa Produtor de Água” (ANA): 1. Teoria. Rev Bras Recur Hidr 9:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R (2008) Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecol Econ 65:737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2005) Empirical reformulation of the universal soil loss equation for erosion risk assessment in a tropical watershed. Geoderma 124:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedecek RA, Resck DVS, Freitas Júnior E (1986) Perdas de solo, água e nutrientes por erosão em Latossolo vermelho-escuro dos cerrados em diferentes cultivos sob chuva natural. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 10:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Denardin JR (1990) Erodibilidade do solo estimada por meio de parâmetros físicos e químicos. PhD Dissertation, ESALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PJJ, Grovers G (1996) A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv 51:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • ERSDAC—Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center (2011) ASTER GDEM Website. http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp. Acessed 15 July 2012

  • EMBRAPA. Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação dos Solos (1978) Levantamento de Reconhecimento dos Solos do Distrito Federal. Escala 1:100.000. EMBRAPA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Farinasso M, Carvalho Júnior OA, Guimarães RF, Gomes RAT, Ramos VM (2006) Avaliação qualitativa do potencial de erosão laminar em grandes áreas por meio da EUPS—Equação Universal de Perdas de Solos utilizando novas metodologias em SIG para os cálculos dos seus fatores na região do Alto Parnaíba-PI-MA. Rev Bras Geomorfologia 7:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha NM (2011) Application of Usle and Gis tool to predict soil erosion potential and proposal land cover solutions to reduce soil loss in Tay Nguyen. http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2011/papers/ts06c/ts06c _nguyen_manh_5011.pdf > Acessed 15 august 2012

  • Kinnell PIA (2001) Slope length factor for applying the USLE-M to erosion in grid cells. Soil Tillage Res 58:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (2005) Alternative approaches for determining the USLE-M slope length factor for grid cells. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:674–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima JEFW, Lopes WTA (2009) Estimativa da erosão no Estado do Tocantins utilizando a equação universal de perda de solo. In: Ide CN, Val LAA, Ribeiro ML (eds) Produção de sedimentos e seus impactos ambientais, sociais e econômicos. Oeste, Campo Grande, Brazil, pp 499–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima JEFW, Silva EM, Eid NJ, Martins ES, Koide S, Reatto A (2007) Desenvolvimento e verificação de métodos indiretos para a estimativa da erodibilidade dos solos da bacia experimental do alto rio jardim DF. Rev Bras Geomorfologia 8:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, JEFW, Silva, FDM; Martins PR, Sobrinho HC, Oliveira NB (2013) Modelagem da erosão como subsídio a implantação do Programa Produtor de Águas na Bacia do Ribeirão Pipiripau. In: Proceedings of the XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Foz do Iguaçu: INPE 5673-5680

  • Lorz C, Neumann C, Bakker F, Pietzsch K, Weiss H, Makeschin F (2012) A web-based planning support tool for sediment management in a meso-scale river basin in Western Central Brazil. J Environ Manag 1:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellerowicz KT, Rees HW, Chow TL, Ghanem I (1994) Soil conservation planning at the watershed level using the Universal Soil Loss Equation with GIS and microcomputer technologies: a case study. J Soil Water Conserv 49:194–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch G (1986) Physical basis of the Length–Slope factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PTS, Wendland E, Nearing MA (2012) Rainfall erosivity in Brazil: a review. Catena 100:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SiIva MLN, Curi N, Oliveira MS, Ferreira MM, Lombardi Neto F (1994) Comparação entre métodos direto e indiretos para determinação da erodibilidade em Latossolos sob Cerrado. Pesq Agropec Bras 29:1751–1761

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva AM (2004) Rainfall erosivity map for Brazil. Catena 57:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AM, Silva MLN, Curi N, Avanzi JC, Ferreira MM (2009) Erosividade da chuva e erodibilidade de cambissolo e latossolo na região de lavras, sul de minas gerais. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 3:1811–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1976) Determining the universal soil loss equation's length-slope factor for watersheds. In: Erosion and solid matter transport in inland waters. IAHS Publ 122, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp 217-225

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide planning. USDA agriculture handbook 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank CNPq (project number 483410/2011-0), FINEP CT-Hidro (REHIDRO Project), and Embrapa (ECOVALORAÇÃO and GEOCERRADO Projects) for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima.

Additional information

Responsible editor: José Carlos de Araujo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lima, J.E.F.W., Lopes, W.T.A., Aquino, F.G. et al. Assessing the use of erosion modeling to support payment for environmental services programs. J Soils Sediments 14, 1258–1265 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0821-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0821-0

Keywords

Navigation