Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perspectives of function-based soil evaluation in land-use planning in China

  • SOILS, SEC 1 • SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

The complex and multi-functional body of soil is crucial for land use; therefore, soil evaluation should guide land-use planning. In regard to this, there is an urgent need for function-based soil evaluation, especially in highly developed and fast-growing countries. In China, there is no specified law which may protect soil comprehensively, and due to ignorance of certain soil functions, soil evaluation has not played a prominent role in land-use planning. In addition, soil evaluation must be brought into the practices of land-use planning in China to facilitate rational and sustainable land use.

Materials and methods

In this study, by analyzing the evidence of soil functions and the according algorithms for soil evaluation, the necessity and possibility of combining function-based soil evaluation and land-use planning are found. For this, existing application studies from China and Europe were used. Using the methods of TUSEC (Technique for Soil Evaluation and Categorization for Natural and Anthropogenic Soils), the results of function-based soil evaluation of Zhengzhou City are shown, and tentative suggestions for land-use planning are given. Through the summarization of the previous discussion and a case study of Zhengzhou City, the future possibilities and perspectives for soil evaluation in land-use planning in China are determined.

Results and discussion

At present, China's focus in soil evaluation is on agriculture; thus, a lack of attention toward ecological balances in the environment has been found. In order to satisfy the reasonable planning of different land uses, a function-based framework of soil evaluation is required. TUSEC was found to be a suitable model for the evaluation method of soil functions, which China could adopt in its land-use planning. Function-based soil evaluation is necessary to improve land-use database and mapping to guide overall land-use planning, to optimize local ecological adjustment, and to monitor ecological sensitive areas.

Conclusions

As the awareness of sustainable development grows, the role of soil evaluation in the procedure of land-use planning is becoming increasingly important in China. A function-based soil evaluation may be adapted to this necessity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An LP, Xu Y, Zhang FR (2005) Soil evaluation and land use planning. Present Expect Soil Sci in China 137–148, in Chinese

  • Baden-Württemberg Research Center for Environment, Measurements and Nature Conservation (2010) Evaluation of soils according to their performance, guide to planning permission and procedures. 2nd completely revised edition of the publication of the Environmental Ministry of Baden-Württemberg (1995), No. 31 series of Air Soil Waste

  • Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development (2002) Soil Functions. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/. Accessed 12 Apr 2011

  • Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development (2006) Soil Functions. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/. Accessed 12 Apr 2011

  • Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development of Berlin (2009) Soil Functions. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/. Accessed 12 Apr 2011

  • Blum WEH (2005) Functions of soil for society and the environment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 4(3):75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium der J (1998) Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetz—BBodSchG. Bundesgesetzblatt I. Bonn, p 502

  • Chen CL, Zhang MS et al (2004) Studies on buffering action of Chao Soil and Lime Drab Soil. J Henan Agric Sci 6:56–57 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • China State Council (2008) National Land-use Planning Outline (2006–2020), in Chinese

  • Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (2003) Revised European charter for the protection and sustainable management of soil. Committee for the activities of the Council of Europe in the field of biological and landscape diversity (CO-DBP), p 9

  • Costanza R, Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R (1997) The value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng SK, Zheng RH et al (2006) Soil buffer capacity for pollutants. Sichuan Environ 25(14):113–117 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, England (2004) The first soil action plan for England: 2004–2006

  • European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: “Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection”. Council Conclusions on Integrated Soil Protection, Brussels, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. European Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Zhang GL et al (2007) Soil record of black carbon during urbanization and its environmental implications. Environ Sci 28(10):2369–2374 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua L (1992) Buffer capacity of soil to pollutant. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 2:14–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil References Report No. 103, FAO, Rome

  • Jiang M, Lu XG, Yang Q (2006) Wetland soil and its system of environment function assessment. Wetl Sci 4(3):168–173 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Land and Resources Bureau of Zhengzhou City (2010) Land-use overall planning of Zhengzhou (2010–2020), in Chinese

  • Lehmann A, Stahr K (2010) The potential of soil functions and planner-oriented soil evaluation to achieve sustainable land use. J Soils Sediments 10:1092–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, David S, Stahr K (2008) Technique for Soil Evaluation and Categorization for Natural and Anthropogenic Soils (TUSEC). Institute for Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim

  • Li WH (2008) The theory, method and application of ecosystem services’ value assessment. Chinese Renmin University Press Company, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang SY, Lehmann A, Stahr K, Wu KN (2011) Planner-oriented soil evaluation in China with TUSEC (Technique for Soil Evaluation and Categorization for Natural and Anthropogenic Soils). Annual Meeting of the German Soil Science Society (Jahrestagung der Deutsche Bodenkundliche Gesellschaft), Berlin Berichte der DBG. http://eprints.dbges.de/690/. Accessed 16 Oct 2011

  • Liu ZG (2006) Study on the valuation techniques of soil carbon storage function—a case of wetland soils in Sanjiang plain. J Nat Resour 21(2):180–187 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Shang QC (2001) Buffer action and its influencing factors of different types of soil in Changchun region. J Jilin Univ 23(3):78–82 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SL, Fu BJ et al (2006) Research review of quantitative evaluation of soil quality in China. Chinese J Soil Sci 37(1):137–143 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land and Resources of China (2003) Regulations for classification on agricultural Land. National Project of Classification on Agricultural Land of China, in Chinese

  • Soil and Fertilizer Station of Henan Province, Soil Survey Office of Henan Province (1995) Notes of native soil types in Henan Province. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun ZY, Wu KN et al (2007) Impact of urbanization on soil functions in Zhengzhou City. Acta Pedologica Sinica 144(11):21–26 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T, Zhu T, Xu H (2005) Strategic environmental assessment of land-use planning in China. Environ Inform Arch 3:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzilivakis J, Lewis KA, Williamson AR (2005) A prototype framework for assessing risks to soil functions. Environ Impact Asses Rev 25:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umweltministerium von BW (1991) Bodenschutzgesetz von Baden-Württemberg (BodSchG). GBl, pp 434–440

  • Wang XL (2008) Study on the evaluation of regional soil’s major functions, a case study of Zhengzhou suburbs. Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Yu T et al. (2013) Geochemical evaluation of land quality in China and its applications. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, GEXPLO-05208, No of Pages 14

  • Yu KJ, Li DH (2002) On Anti-planning Concept and Ecological Infrastructure. Green Forum Proceedings of Hangzhou City. China Academy of Art Publishing House, Beijing, pp 55–68, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GL, Zhao YG et al (2007) Urban soil environment issues and research progresses. Acta Pedologica Sinic 44(5):925–933

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao QG, Sun B, Zhang TL (1997) Soil quality and sustainable environment: definition and methods for assessment of soil quality. Soils 3:113–120 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao QG et al (2011) Progress in significant soil science fields of China over the last three decades: a review. Pedosphere 21(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 40971127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Si-Yuan Liang or Andreas Lehmann.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gilbert C. Sigua

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, SY., Lehmann, A., Wu, KN. et al. Perspectives of function-based soil evaluation in land-use planning in China. J Soils Sediments 14, 10–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0787-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0787-y

Keywords

Navigation