A sediment remediation project in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada, proposes to use a thin layer cap for managing residual contamination from dredging as well as areas of marginal contamination not included in the dredge plan. Bottom shear stress (BSS) from weather, as well as propeller wash, have the potential to severely erode thin layer caps. The proposed thin layer cap was examined with respect to the BSS expected in Hamilton Harbour over a 6-month period.
Materials and methods
BSS from vessels was estimated using published equations and BSS from weather using the MIKE 3 model. Critical shear stress for the capping sand was estimated using established equations and an annular flume.
Results and discussion
Estimated BSS from marine vessels was found to exceed the critical shear stress in most cases. However, the extent of impact was difficult to determine and was mitigated to some extent by short vessel passage times, slightly differing routes and further sediment movement caused by weather. The average estimated BSS from weather for the study period was found to be below the critical shear stress for the capping sand, but the maximum BSS exceeded for a small area of the site.
Apart from the shipping routes, the majority of the capping area should remain well below the critical shear stress. However, consideration of a larger grain size of capping material for the shallow areas should be considered. This would be of value for future storm conditions which might exceed what was experienced during the 6-month study period.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Amos CL, Droppo IG (1996) Stability of remediated lakebed sediment, Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada. Open File report No. 2276. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Amos CL, Li MZ, Sutherland TF (1998) The contribution of ballistic momentum flux to the erosion of cohesive beds by flowing water. J Coastal Res 14:564–569
daSilva AMAF, Bolisetti T (2000) A method for the formulation of Reynolds number functions. Can J Civil Engineer 27:829–833
Droppo IG (2001) Rethinking what constitutes suspended sediment. Hydrol Process 15:1551–1564
Engler R, Saunders L, Wright T (1991) Environmental effects of aquatic disposal of dredged material. Environ Professional 13:317–325
Folk RL (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. J Geol 62:344–359
Grabowski RC, Droppo IG, Wharton G (2010) Estimation of critical shear stress from cohesive strength meter derived erosion thresholds. Limnol Oceanogr-Meth 8:678–685
Graham M, Hartman E, Joyner R, Santiago R (2012) PAH-contaminated sediment remediation: an overview of a proposed large scale clean-up in a freshwater harbour. In: Mulligan (ed). Contaminated Sediments: Restoration of Aquatic Environment on May 23–25, 2012 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada; STP 1554. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. pp 1–23. DOI:10.1520/STP104354
Hayes DF, Chintamaneni R, Bommareddy P, Cherukuri B (2012) Vessel-induced sediment resuspension. J Dredging Engineer 12:1–23
He C, Rao YR, Marvin CH (2012) Numerical modeling study of hydraulic impact of a large sediment capping facility. J Hydraulic Engineer 138:642–652
Irvine KN, Droppo IG, Murphy TP, Lawson A (1997) Sediment resuspension and dissolved oxygen levels associated with ship traffic: implications for habitat remediation. Water Qual Res J Can 32:421–437
Lau YL, Droppo IG (2000) Influence of antecedent conditions on critical shear stress of bed sediments. Water Res 34:663–667
Liou Y-C, Herbich JB (1976) Sediment movement induced by ships in restricted waterways. TAMU-SG-76-209, COE Report No. 188 Texas A&M University, USA
Maurer DL, Keck RT, Tinsman JC, Leathern WA, Wethe CA, Hunt-Zinger M, Lord C, Church TM (1978) Vertical migration of benthos I simulated dredged material overburden. Volume 1: marine benthos. Technical Report D-78-35(NTIS No.AD-A058725) U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA
Maurer DL, Keck RT, Tinsman JC, Leathern WA (1981a) Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: part I—mollusca. Mar Environ Res 4:299–319
Maurer DL, Keck RT, Tinsman JC, Leathern WA (1981b) Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: part II—crustacea. Mar Environ Res 5:301–317
Maurer DL, Keck RT, Tinsman JC, Leathern WA (1982) Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: part III—polychaeta. Mar Environ Res 6:49–68
Nichols JA, Rowe GT, Clifford CH, Young RA (1978) In situ experiments on the burial of marine invertebrates. J Sediment Petrol 48:419–425
Oliver JS, Slattery PN, Hulberg LW, Nybakken W (1977) Patterns of succession in benthic infaunal communities following dredging and dredged material disposal in Monterey Bay. Contract Report D-77-27(NTIS No. AD-A049632). U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA
Palermo M, Maynord S, Miller J, Reible D (1998) Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediment (ARCS) Program—guidance for in-situ subaqueous capping of contaminated sediments. Appendix A. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 905 B96-004, USA
Palermo M, Schroeder PR, Estes JR, Francingues NR (2008) Technical guidelines for environmental dredging of contaminated sites. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Centre—ERDC/EL TR-08-29, USA
Reible D, Hayes D, Lue-Hing C, Patterson J, Bhownik N, Johnson M, Teal J (2003) Comparison of the long-term risk of removal and in situ management of contaminated sediments in the Fox River. Soil Sediment Contam 12:325–344
Rukavina NA, Versteeg JK (1995) The physical properties of the surficial sediments of Hamilton Harbour. National Water Research Institute Contribution No. 95-150, NWRI, Burlington, Canada
Zeman AJ (1994) Subaqueous capping of very soft contaminated sediments. Can Geotech J 31:570–577
Zeman AJ, Graham JE (1991) Design considerations for subaqueous capping in Hamilton Harbour—impact velocity of sand and sand penetration into very soft cohesive sediments. National Water Research Institute Contribution No. 91-26, NWRI, Burlington, Canada
Responsible editor: Gijs D. Breedveld
About this article
Cite this article
Graham, M., Hartman, E., He, C. et al. Examining thin layer cap behaviour in a freshwater industrial harbour. J Soils Sediments 13, 1515–1526 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0749-4
- Bottom shear stress
- Critical shear stress
- Randle reef
- Thin layer capping