Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improvement of biochemical and biological properties of eroded red soil by artificial revegetation

  • SOILS, SEC 3 * REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRATED LANDS * RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Large areas of red soil in southern China are degraded due to improper management in land use change from forest to agricultural crops in 1970s, which has resulted in serious soil erosion. Since 1980s, artificial revegetation has been practiced to restore the productivity and maintain ecological functionality of red soils. Whereas numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of revegetation on soil physical and chemical properties, little information is available on soil microbial responses. The objective of this work was thus to investigate the influence of plant species and growing period on soil biochemical and biological properties.

Materials and methods

In March 2005, the field trial was set up using two historical revegetation experiments with different plant species established in 1985 (20-year) and in 1993 (12-year). The trial had six vegetation treatments with three replications. The plant species on the trial site included crenate gugertree, Chinese fir, grapefruit, and annual ryegrass. Soil samples (0–0.2 m) were taken from the trial site and analyzed for the soil total organic C (TOC), microbial biomass C (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), water-soluble organic C (WSOC), and mineralizable C (MC). The specific ability of soil microbiota to consume a range of C substrates was measured using Biolog ECO microplate.

Results and discussion

Soil TOC, MBC, MBN, WSOC, and MC were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) enhanced by artificial revegetation treatments. All soil parameters analyzed were improved with the revegetation time when comparing 20-year Chinese fir with 12-year Chinese fir. Soil parameters in 20-year crenate gugertree stand were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater than the 20-year Chinese fir. Concentrations of most C forms and MBN in soils of the 12-year ryegrass treatment were generally higher than those of the 12-year Chinese fir and grapefruit treatments. The activities of microbial communities as average well color development measured with Biolog ECO microtiter plate were in the order of 20-year crenate gugertree and 20-year Chinese fir > 12-year Chinese fir and 12-year ryegrass > 12-year grapefruit and the control. The patterns of C utilization obtained from principal component analysis showed that microbial communities from plots with various revegetation duration (20-year site vs 12-year site) separated along the first component (PC1) and with different species along the second component (PC2). Soil biochemical and biological properties were closely related to the types and amount of C source, which were influenced by plant species and revegetation time.

Conclusions

Artificial revegetation can effectively enhance the productivity of degraded red soil caused by erosion in subtropical areas of China. The revegetation time was positively related to improvement of soil biological and biochemical properties. Plant species selection can also significantly influence the outcome of artificial revegetation. Among the species used in our study, crenate gugertree and ryegrass can enhance soil biological properties better than the other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Avidano L, Gamalero E, Cossa GP, Carraro E (2005) Characterization of soil health in an Italian polluted site by using microorganisms as bioindicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ Appl Soil Ecol 30:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bååth E, Diaz-Ravina M, Frostegård Å, Campbell CD (1998) Effect of metal-rich sludge amendments on the soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronwyn DH, Raymond LC, Wendy M, Clive AK, Clive EP (1997) Using the Gini coefficient with Biolog substrate utilization data to provide an alternative quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities. J Microbiol Methods 30:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton J, Chen CR, Xu ZH, Ghadiri H (2007) Soluble organic nitrogen pools in adjacent native and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2723–2734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CD, Grayston SJ, Hirst DJ (1997) Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source test to discriminate soil microbial communities. J Microbiol Methods 30:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SJ, Campbell CD, Artz RRE (2007) Assessing CLPPs using MicroReSp (TM)—a comparison with Biolog and multi-SIR. J Soils Sediments 7(6):406–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Soil Survey Office (1987) China Soils. China Science Press, Beijing, p 746 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Homs FM, Zuberer DA (1995) Soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, mineralizable carbon and nitrogen in sorghum. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:460–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu QL, Luo YJ (1995) Vegetation recovery and its ecological effect on red earth in the low hill area. Zhejiang Nongye Daxue Xuebao 7(2):85–87 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallet C, Keller C (1999) Phenolic composition of soil solutions: comparative study of lysimeter and centrifuge waters. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1151–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL (1996) Analytical approaches to the characterization of samples of microbial communities using patterns of potential C source utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 28:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL (1997) Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 24:289–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL, Mills AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell CD, Edwards AC (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2001) Labile organic matter as an indicator of organic matter quality in arable and pastoral soil in New Zealand. Soil Biol Biochem 32:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He ZL (1997) Soil microbial biomass and its significance in assessment on soil nutrients cycling and environmental quality. Soils 29:61–69 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Innes L, Hobbs PJ, Bardgett RD (2004) The impact of individual plant species on rhizosphere microbial communities in soils of different fertility. Biol Fertil Soils 40:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World soil resources reports no. 103. FAO, Rome, p 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang PK, Jiang QY, Xu QF, Qian XB, Zhang QX (1994) Studies on organic compounds in rhizosphere soil of Chinese fir and Chinese Sassafras. J Zhejiang For Coll 11:234–240 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Booth RE, Whiteley AS, Bailly MJ, Read DJ, Grime JP, Leake JR (2003) Plant community composition affects the biomass, activity and diversity of microorganisms in limestone grassland soil. Eur J Soil Sci 54:671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DA, Cambandella CA (1996) Conservation strategies for improving soil quality and organic matter storage. In: Lal R (ed) Structure and organic matter storage in agriculture soils. Adv Soil Sci. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 395–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang BC, Mackenzie AF, Schnitzer M (1998) Management-induced change in labile soil organic matter under continuous corn in eastern Canadian soils. Biol Fertil Soils 26:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Luo RY (1990) Chemical characteristics of humus in forest soils of NanJing-ZhenJiang hills. J Nanjing Univ 14:1–6 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madhun YA, Young JL, Freed VH (1986) Binding of herbicides by water-soluble organic materials from soil. J Microbiol Methods 15:64–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKeajue JA (1978) Manual of soil sampling and method of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science Ottawa, Ontario, p 212

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira R, Marques SM, Antunes SC, Marques C, Abrantes N, Pestana JLT, Gonçalves F (2008) Comparison of Portuguese soils from different geographical regions using physicochemical, biological and biochemical parameters. J Soils Sediments 8(2):106–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter CS, Klooster SA (1997) Global model estimates of carbon and nitrogen storage in litter and soil pools: response to change in vegetation quality and biomass allocation. Tellus B 49:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quideau SA, Chadwick OA, Benesi A, Graham RC, Anderson MA (2001) A direct link between forest vegetation type and soil organic matter composition. Geoderma 104:41–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shira HD, Victor PC, Kate MS (2005) Microbial community composition on native and drastically disturbed serpentine soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1427–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1992) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1997) Soil microbial biomass activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 97–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Zhang TL, Zhao QG (1999) Fertility restoration of red soils in low-hilly region of middle subtropical China. Pedosphere 9:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang QY, Feng MG (2003) Practical statistics and DPS data processing system. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, p 407 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian GM, Wang FE, Chen YX, He YF, Fu QL, Kumar S, Lin Q (2003) Effect of different vegetation systems on soil erosion and soil nutrients in red soil region of southeastern China. Pedosphere 13:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DC (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer F, Fliebach A, Laczko E, Schulze-Aurich J, Zeyer J (2001) Assessing soil biological characteristics. A comparison of buck soil community DNA-, PLFA-, and Biolog™-analyses. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1029–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YS, Chen GS, Yu XT (2001) Soil fertility in agroforestry system of Chinese fir and villous amomum in subtropical China. Pedosphere 11:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao HY, Zl He, Wilson MJ, Campbell CD (2000) Microbial biomass and community structure in a sequence of soil with increasing fertility and changing land use. Microb Ecol 40:223–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabinski CA (1997) Effect of recreational impacts on soil microbial communities. Environ Manage 21:233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak JC, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Wildman HG (1994) Functional diversity of microbial communities. A quantitative approach. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1101–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MK, Xu JM (2002) Restoration characteristics of fertility quality of degraded red soils in subtropics of China. J Soil Water Conserv 16:112–115 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao QG, Xu MJ (2004) A sustainable agriculture evaluation model for red soil hill region of southeast China. Pedosphere 14:313–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the grant awarded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30671203) for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peikun Jiang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Winfried Schröder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Jiang, P. & Wang, H. Improvement of biochemical and biological properties of eroded red soil by artificial revegetation. J Soils Sediments 10, 255–262 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0100-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0100-2

Keywords