Skip to main content
Log in

Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., as a green manure for ameliorating soil exposed to acid rain in Southern China

  • SOILS, SECTION 3 • REM AND MANAGE OF CONTAM / DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aims, and scope

Increasing soil acidification is a growing concern in southern China. The traditional green manures applied in the fields mostly comprise legumes that tend to accelerate soil acidification. Moreover, acid deposition can act as a source of nitrogen. Hence, we looked for new plant species that would enhance nutrient concentrations when used as green manure and would reduce soil acidity or at least not worsen it.

Materials and methods

We studied the use of Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. for ameliorating acid soil in a pot experiment with simulated acid rain (SAR) treatments (pH 5.8 to 3.0) in an open area in Guangzhou City. The pots were divided into two groups named A and B groups. On day 0, pots of A group were filled with soil and planted with Erigeron annuus seedlings. Pots of B group were only filled with soil as the control. On day 40, seedlings of E. annuus were harvested and buried in the corresponding pots. On day 54, two seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. were sown in each pot in both groups. The growth and bean yield of P. vulgaris seedlings were then used to evaluate the effects of E. annuus on acid soil. Plant and/or soil samples were collected on days 0, 40, 54, and 150; corresponding parameters were measured.

Results

Results showed that E. annuus could maintain a good growth even on very acid soil. On day 40, the pH decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) in the B group pots without E. annuus compared with the A group. On day 54, after E. annuus was buried as a manure, the soil pH of all A group treatments except the pH 4.0 treatment showed a significant increase compared to day 40 (P < 0.01). At the same time, the application of E. annuus as a manure produced a significant increase of soil K and P (P < 0.001), Ca (P < 0.05), and Mg (P < 0.001) concentrations of all A group SAR treatments compared to their B group counterparts (except control pots for Ca). The soil exchangeable K and available P concentration doubled, and Ca and Mg increased by around 25% in the presence of the E. annuus manure application.

Discussion

The higher soil pH in the A group than B group on the day 40 was due to a great absorption of NO3 by the roots of E. annuus. The soil pH increase after E. annuus was applied to the soil of A group was attributed to the release of high amount of K, the mineralization of organic N, and the oxidation of organic acid anions. Nutrient increase in the A group after E. annuus application was mostly the result of the nutrient release during the residue decomposition. The amelioration of the soil was effective as demonstrated by the enhanced growth and bean yield of P. vulgaris seedlings on the manured soil compared to the seedlings grown on a control that was not manured.

Conclusions

E. annuus could maintain a good growth in the acid lateritic field soil. Cultivating this plant and applying it to the soil with a rate of 1.6 ton ha−1 doubled the soil K and P concentrations and increased soil exchangeable Ca and Mg concentrations by around 25%. This species would be a good green manure candidate for growing in the acid soils of southern China. Application of E. annuus also has beneficial effects on crop growth through reduced Al toxicity and cation leaching.

Recommendations and perspectives

Since E. annuus would improve soil pH and nutrient concentrations with minimum care, it is recommended for treating acid soils with poor yield whenever a low-cost solution is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • APHA Standard Methods (1998a) Method 4500-SO4 D, 20th edn

  • APHA Standard Methods (1998b), Method 4500-P D, 20th edn

  • Bessho TI, Bell CL (1992) Soil solid and solution phase change and mung bean response during amelioration of aluminum toxicity with organic matter. Plant Soil 140(2):183–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busch G, Lammel G, Beese FO, Feichter J, Dentener FJ, Roelofs GJ (2001) Forest ecosystems and the changing patterns of nitrogen input and acid deposition today and in the future based on a scenario. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao DW (1998) Changes in pH, CEC and exchangeable acidity of some forest soils in southern China during the last 32–35 years. Water Air Soil Pollut 108:377–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade RP, Figueiredo BR, de Mello JWV, Santos JCZ, Zandonadi LU (2008) Control of geochemical mobility of arsenic by liming in materials subjected to acid mine drainage. J Soil Sediments 8(2):123–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries W, Posch M, Oja T, van Oene H, Kros H, Warfvinge P, Arp PA (1995) Modelling critical loads for the Solling spruce site. Ecol Model 83:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolling PJ (1995) Effect of lupins and location on soil acidification rates. Aust J Exp Agric 35(6):753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian P, Kohlpaintner M, Rollenbeck R (2005) Biomass burning in the Amazon—fertilizer for the mountaineous rain forest in Ecuador. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12(5):290–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao C, Sun B, Zhang T (2006) Sustainable nutrient management in Chinese agriculture: challenges and perspective. Pedosphere 16(2):253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (1990) Active ion uptake and maintenance of cation–anion balance: a critical examination of their role in regulating rhizosphere pH. Plant Soil 126(2):247–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:47–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang CX, Jaillard B (2003) Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248(1/2):43–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koptsik G, Mukhina I (1995) Effects of acid deposition on acidity and exchangeable cations in podzols of the Kola Peninsula. Water Air Soil Pollut 85(3):1209–1214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larssen T, Schnoor JL, Seip HM, Zhao DW (2000) Evaluation of different approaches for modeling effects of acid rain on soils in China. Sci Total Environ 246(2/3):175–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao B, Larssen T, Seip HM (1998) Response of five Chinese forest soils to acidic inputs: batch experiment. Geoderma 86(3/4):295–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zhou G, Zhang D (2007) Effects of acidic solutions on element dynamics in monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest at Dinghushan, China. Part 1: dynamics of K, Na, Ca, Mg and P. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(2):123–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lofts S, Woof C, Tipping E, Clarke N, Mulder J (2001) Modelling pH buffering and aluminium solubility in European forest soils. Eur J Soil Sci 52(2):189–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lungu OI, Temba J, Chirwa B, Lungu C (1993) Effects of lime and farmyard manure on soil acidity and maize growth on an acid alfisol from Zambia. Trop Agric 70(4):309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Naramabuye FX, Haynes RJ (2006) Effect of organic amendments on soil Ph and solubility and use of laboratory indices to predict their liming effect. Technical articles. Soil Sci 171(10):754–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas D, Nason A (1957) Determination nitrate and nitrite. Methods Enzymol 3:981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble AD, Zenneck I, Randall PJ (1996) Leaf litter ash alkalinity and neutralisation of soil acidity. Plant Soil 179(2):293–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T, Crannell BS (1996) Green and animal manure-derived dissolved organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption. J Environ Qual 25(5):1137–1143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan GX (1992) Acidification of soils in Mount Lushan over the last 35 years. Pedosphere 2(2):179–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patiram R (1996) Effect of limestone and farmyard manure on crop yields and soil acidity on an acid Inceptisol in Sikkim, India. Trop Agric 73(3):238–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce FJ, Warncke DD (2000) Soil and crop response to variable-rate liming for two Michigan fields. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(2):774–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre WH, Banwart WL (1973) Excess-base and excess-base/nitrogen ratio of various crop species and parts of plants. Agron J 65:91–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pocknee S, Sumner ME (1997) Cation and nitrogen contents of organic matter determine its soil liming potential. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(1):86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA (1976) Properties and management of soils in the tropics. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman LM, Boswell FC, Ohki K, Parker MB, Wilson DO (1983) Effects of HCl acid and lime amendments on soil pH and extractable Ca and Mg in a sandy soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 14(6):481–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Sparling CP, McLay CD, Raphael C (1999) Effect of short-term residue decomposition on soil acidity. Aust J Soil Res 37(3):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson GH (2003) Acidic deposition, nutrient leaching and forest growth. Biogeochemistry 65(1):51–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich B (1983) Effects of acid deposition. In: Beilke S, Elshout AJ (eds) Acid deposition. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitorello VA, Capaldi FR, Stefanuto VA (2005) Recent advances in aluminum toxicity and resistance in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17(1):129–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voundi N, Tack F, Verloo G (1999) Dynamics of nutrients in tropical acid soils amended with paper pulp sludge. Waste Manage Res 17(3):198–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue N, Seip HM, Liao B, Vogt RD (2003) Studies of acid deposition and its effects in two small catchments in Hunan, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(3):399–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Schubert S, Mengel K (1996) Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic acids. Soil Biol Biochem 28(4/5):617–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial and in-kind support was received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700112, 40730102, and 30725006), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (7006918), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyi Zhou.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Peng, S., Faivre-vuillin, B. et al. Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., as a green manure for ameliorating soil exposed to acid rain in Southern China. J Soils Sediments 8, 452–460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-008-0041-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-008-0041-1

Keywords

Navigation