Abstract
Background, aims, and scope
Increasing soil acidification is a growing concern in southern China. The traditional green manures applied in the fields mostly comprise legumes that tend to accelerate soil acidification. Moreover, acid deposition can act as a source of nitrogen. Hence, we looked for new plant species that would enhance nutrient concentrations when used as green manure and would reduce soil acidity or at least not worsen it.
Materials and methods
We studied the use of Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. for ameliorating acid soil in a pot experiment with simulated acid rain (SAR) treatments (pH 5.8 to 3.0) in an open area in Guangzhou City. The pots were divided into two groups named A and B groups. On day 0, pots of A group were filled with soil and planted with Erigeron annuus seedlings. Pots of B group were only filled with soil as the control. On day 40, seedlings of E. annuus were harvested and buried in the corresponding pots. On day 54, two seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. were sown in each pot in both groups. The growth and bean yield of P. vulgaris seedlings were then used to evaluate the effects of E. annuus on acid soil. Plant and/or soil samples were collected on days 0, 40, 54, and 150; corresponding parameters were measured.
Results
Results showed that E. annuus could maintain a good growth even on very acid soil. On day 40, the pH decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) in the B group pots without E. annuus compared with the A group. On day 54, after E. annuus was buried as a manure, the soil pH of all A group treatments except the pH 4.0 treatment showed a significant increase compared to day 40 (P < 0.01). At the same time, the application of E. annuus as a manure produced a significant increase of soil K and P (P < 0.001), Ca (P < 0.05), and Mg (P < 0.001) concentrations of all A group SAR treatments compared to their B group counterparts (except control pots for Ca). The soil exchangeable K and available P concentration doubled, and Ca and Mg increased by around 25% in the presence of the E. annuus manure application.
Discussion
The higher soil pH in the A group than B group on the day 40 was due to a great absorption of NO3 − by the roots of E. annuus. The soil pH increase after E. annuus was applied to the soil of A group was attributed to the release of high amount of K, the mineralization of organic N, and the oxidation of organic acid anions. Nutrient increase in the A group after E. annuus application was mostly the result of the nutrient release during the residue decomposition. The amelioration of the soil was effective as demonstrated by the enhanced growth and bean yield of P. vulgaris seedlings on the manured soil compared to the seedlings grown on a control that was not manured.
Conclusions
E. annuus could maintain a good growth in the acid lateritic field soil. Cultivating this plant and applying it to the soil with a rate of 1.6 ton ha−1 doubled the soil K and P concentrations and increased soil exchangeable Ca and Mg concentrations by around 25%. This species would be a good green manure candidate for growing in the acid soils of southern China. Application of E. annuus also has beneficial effects on crop growth through reduced Al toxicity and cation leaching.
Recommendations and perspectives
Since E. annuus would improve soil pH and nutrient concentrations with minimum care, it is recommended for treating acid soils with poor yield whenever a low-cost solution is required.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
APHA Standard Methods (1998a) Method 4500-SO4 D, 20th edn
APHA Standard Methods (1998b), Method 4500-P D, 20th edn
Bessho TI, Bell CL (1992) Soil solid and solution phase change and mung bean response during amelioration of aluminum toxicity with organic matter. Plant Soil 140(2):183–196
Busch G, Lammel G, Beese FO, Feichter J, Dentener FJ, Roelofs GJ (2001) Forest ecosystems and the changing patterns of nitrogen input and acid deposition today and in the future based on a scenario. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2:95–102
Dai Z, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao DW (1998) Changes in pH, CEC and exchangeable acidity of some forest soils in southern China during the last 32–35 years. Water Air Soil Pollut 108:377–390
de Andrade RP, Figueiredo BR, de Mello JWV, Santos JCZ, Zandonadi LU (2008) Control of geochemical mobility of arsenic by liming in materials subjected to acid mine drainage. J Soil Sediments 8(2):123–129
de Vries W, Posch M, Oja T, van Oene H, Kros H, Warfvinge P, Arp PA (1995) Modelling critical loads for the Solling spruce site. Ecol Model 83:283–293
Dolling PJ (1995) Effect of lupins and location on soil acidification rates. Aust J Exp Agric 35(6):753–763
Fabian P, Kohlpaintner M, Rollenbeck R (2005) Biomass burning in the Amazon—fertilizer for the mountaineous rain forest in Ecuador. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12(5):290–296
Gao C, Sun B, Zhang T (2006) Sustainable nutrient management in Chinese agriculture: challenges and perspective. Pedosphere 16(2):253–263
Haynes RJ (1990) Active ion uptake and maintenance of cation–anion balance: a critical examination of their role in regulating rhizosphere pH. Plant Soil 126(2):247–264
Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:47–63
Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang CX, Jaillard B (2003) Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248(1/2):43–59
Koptsik G, Mukhina I (1995) Effects of acid deposition on acidity and exchangeable cations in podzols of the Kola Peninsula. Water Air Soil Pollut 85(3):1209–1214
Larssen T, Schnoor JL, Seip HM, Zhao DW (2000) Evaluation of different approaches for modeling effects of acid rain on soils in China. Sci Total Environ 246(2/3):175–193
Liao B, Larssen T, Seip HM (1998) Response of five Chinese forest soils to acidic inputs: batch experiment. Geoderma 86(3/4):295–316
Liu J, Zhou G, Zhang D (2007) Effects of acidic solutions on element dynamics in monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest at Dinghushan, China. Part 1: dynamics of K, Na, Ca, Mg and P. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(2):123–129
Lofts S, Woof C, Tipping E, Clarke N, Mulder J (2001) Modelling pH buffering and aluminium solubility in European forest soils. Eur J Soil Sci 52(2):189–204
Lungu OI, Temba J, Chirwa B, Lungu C (1993) Effects of lime and farmyard manure on soil acidity and maize growth on an acid alfisol from Zambia. Trop Agric 70(4):309–314
Naramabuye FX, Haynes RJ (2006) Effect of organic amendments on soil Ph and solubility and use of laboratory indices to predict their liming effect. Technical articles. Soil Sci 171(10):754–763
Nicholas D, Nason A (1957) Determination nitrate and nitrite. Methods Enzymol 3:981
Noble AD, Zenneck I, Randall PJ (1996) Leaf litter ash alkalinity and neutralisation of soil acidity. Plant Soil 179(2):293–302
Ohno T, Crannell BS (1996) Green and animal manure-derived dissolved organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption. J Environ Qual 25(5):1137–1143
Pan GX (1992) Acidification of soils in Mount Lushan over the last 35 years. Pedosphere 2(2):179–182
Patiram R (1996) Effect of limestone and farmyard manure on crop yields and soil acidity on an acid Inceptisol in Sikkim, India. Trop Agric 73(3):238–241
Pierce FJ, Warncke DD (2000) Soil and crop response to variable-rate liming for two Michigan fields. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(2):774–780
Pierre WH, Banwart WL (1973) Excess-base and excess-base/nitrogen ratio of various crop species and parts of plants. Agron J 65:91–96
Pocknee S, Sumner ME (1997) Cation and nitrogen contents of organic matter determine its soil liming potential. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(1):86–92
Sanchez PA (1976) Properties and management of soils in the tropics. Wiley, New York, USA
Shuman LM, Boswell FC, Ohki K, Parker MB, Wilson DO (1983) Effects of HCl acid and lime amendments on soil pH and extractable Ca and Mg in a sandy soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 14(6):481–495
Tang C, Sparling CP, McLay CD, Raphael C (1999) Effect of short-term residue decomposition on soil acidity. Aust J Soil Res 37(3):561–573
Tomlinson GH (2003) Acidic deposition, nutrient leaching and forest growth. Biogeochemistry 65(1):51–81
Ulrich B (1983) Effects of acid deposition. In: Beilke S, Elshout AJ (eds) Acid deposition. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 31–41
Vitorello VA, Capaldi FR, Stefanuto VA (2005) Recent advances in aluminum toxicity and resistance in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17(1):129–143
Voundi N, Tack F, Verloo G (1999) Dynamics of nutrients in tropical acid soils amended with paper pulp sludge. Waste Manage Res 17(3):198–124
Xue N, Seip HM, Liao B, Vogt RD (2003) Studies of acid deposition and its effects in two small catchments in Hunan, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(3):399–410
Yan F, Schubert S, Mengel K (1996) Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic acids. Soil Biol Biochem 28(4/5):617–623
Acknowledgments
The financial and in-kind support was received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700112, 40730102, and 30725006), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (7006918), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Hailong Wang
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Peng, S., Faivre-vuillin, B. et al. Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., as a green manure for ameliorating soil exposed to acid rain in Southern China. J Soils Sediments 8, 452–460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-008-0041-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-008-0041-1